Cargando…

3D Killer Turn Angle in Transtibial Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Determined by the Graft Turning Angle both in the Sagittal and Coronal Planes

OBJECTIVE: During the transtibial posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction, surgeons commonly pay more attention to the graft turning angle in the sagittal plane (GASP), but the graft turning angle in the coronal plane (GACP) is always neglected. This study hypothesized that the three‐dimens...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jia, Gengxin, Tang, Yuchen, Liu, Zhongcheng, Peng, Bo, Da, Lijun, Yang, Jun, Liu, Xiaolong, Ma, Ming, Han, Hua, Wu, Meng, Geng, Bin, Xia, Yayi, Teng, Yuanjun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35920590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13411
_version_ 1784791586532491264
author Jia, Gengxin
Tang, Yuchen
Liu, Zhongcheng
Peng, Bo
Da, Lijun
Yang, Jun
Liu, Xiaolong
Ma, Ming
Han, Hua
Wu, Meng
Geng, Bin
Xia, Yayi
Teng, Yuanjun
author_facet Jia, Gengxin
Tang, Yuchen
Liu, Zhongcheng
Peng, Bo
Da, Lijun
Yang, Jun
Liu, Xiaolong
Ma, Ming
Han, Hua
Wu, Meng
Geng, Bin
Xia, Yayi
Teng, Yuanjun
author_sort Jia, Gengxin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: During the transtibial posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction, surgeons commonly pay more attention to the graft turning angle in the sagittal plane (GASP), but the graft turning angle in the coronal plane (GACP) is always neglected. This study hypothesized that the three‐dimensional (3D) killer turn angle was determined by both the GASP and GACP, and aimed to quantitively analyze the effects of the GASP and GACP on the 3D killer turn angle. METHODS: This was an in‐vitro computer simulation study of transtibial PCL reconstruction using 3D knee models. Patients with knee injuries who were CT scanned were selected from the CT database (April 2019 to January 2021) at a local hospital for reviewing. A total of 60 3D knees were simulated based on the knees' CT data. The femoral and tibial PCL attachment were located on the 3D knee model using the Rhinoceros software. The tibial tunnels were simulated based on different GASP and GACP. The effects of the GASP and GACP on the 3D killer turn angle were quantitatively analyzed. One‐way analysis of variance was used to compare the outcomes in different groups. The regression analysis was performed to identify variables of the GASP and GACP which significantly affected 3D killer turn angle. RESULTS: The 3D killer turn angle showed a significant proportional relationship not only with the GASP (r (2) > 0.868, P < 0.001), but also with the GACP (r (2) > 0.467, P < 0.001). Every 10° change of the GACP caused 2.8° to 4.4° change of the 3D killer turn angle, whereas every 10° change of the GASP caused 6.4° to 9.2° change of the 3D killer turn angle. CONCLUSIONS: The 3D killer turn angle was significantly affected by both the GASP and GACP. During the transtibial PCL reconstruction, the proximal anterolateral tibial tunnel approach could increase the 3D killer turn angle more obviously compared with the most distal anteromedial tibial tunnel approach. To minimize the killer turn effect, both the GASP and GACP were required to be considered to increase.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9483043
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94830432022-09-29 3D Killer Turn Angle in Transtibial Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Determined by the Graft Turning Angle both in the Sagittal and Coronal Planes Jia, Gengxin Tang, Yuchen Liu, Zhongcheng Peng, Bo Da, Lijun Yang, Jun Liu, Xiaolong Ma, Ming Han, Hua Wu, Meng Geng, Bin Xia, Yayi Teng, Yuanjun Orthop Surg Research Articles OBJECTIVE: During the transtibial posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction, surgeons commonly pay more attention to the graft turning angle in the sagittal plane (GASP), but the graft turning angle in the coronal plane (GACP) is always neglected. This study hypothesized that the three‐dimensional (3D) killer turn angle was determined by both the GASP and GACP, and aimed to quantitively analyze the effects of the GASP and GACP on the 3D killer turn angle. METHODS: This was an in‐vitro computer simulation study of transtibial PCL reconstruction using 3D knee models. Patients with knee injuries who were CT scanned were selected from the CT database (April 2019 to January 2021) at a local hospital for reviewing. A total of 60 3D knees were simulated based on the knees' CT data. The femoral and tibial PCL attachment were located on the 3D knee model using the Rhinoceros software. The tibial tunnels were simulated based on different GASP and GACP. The effects of the GASP and GACP on the 3D killer turn angle were quantitatively analyzed. One‐way analysis of variance was used to compare the outcomes in different groups. The regression analysis was performed to identify variables of the GASP and GACP which significantly affected 3D killer turn angle. RESULTS: The 3D killer turn angle showed a significant proportional relationship not only with the GASP (r (2) > 0.868, P < 0.001), but also with the GACP (r (2) > 0.467, P < 0.001). Every 10° change of the GACP caused 2.8° to 4.4° change of the 3D killer turn angle, whereas every 10° change of the GASP caused 6.4° to 9.2° change of the 3D killer turn angle. CONCLUSIONS: The 3D killer turn angle was significantly affected by both the GASP and GACP. During the transtibial PCL reconstruction, the proximal anterolateral tibial tunnel approach could increase the 3D killer turn angle more obviously compared with the most distal anteromedial tibial tunnel approach. To minimize the killer turn effect, both the GASP and GACP were required to be considered to increase. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9483043/ /pubmed/35920590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13411 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Jia, Gengxin
Tang, Yuchen
Liu, Zhongcheng
Peng, Bo
Da, Lijun
Yang, Jun
Liu, Xiaolong
Ma, Ming
Han, Hua
Wu, Meng
Geng, Bin
Xia, Yayi
Teng, Yuanjun
3D Killer Turn Angle in Transtibial Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Determined by the Graft Turning Angle both in the Sagittal and Coronal Planes
title 3D Killer Turn Angle in Transtibial Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Determined by the Graft Turning Angle both in the Sagittal and Coronal Planes
title_full 3D Killer Turn Angle in Transtibial Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Determined by the Graft Turning Angle both in the Sagittal and Coronal Planes
title_fullStr 3D Killer Turn Angle in Transtibial Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Determined by the Graft Turning Angle both in the Sagittal and Coronal Planes
title_full_unstemmed 3D Killer Turn Angle in Transtibial Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Determined by the Graft Turning Angle both in the Sagittal and Coronal Planes
title_short 3D Killer Turn Angle in Transtibial Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Determined by the Graft Turning Angle both in the Sagittal and Coronal Planes
title_sort 3d killer turn angle in transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is determined by the graft turning angle both in the sagittal and coronal planes
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35920590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13411
work_keys_str_mv AT jiagengxin 3dkillerturnangleintranstibialposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionisdeterminedbythegraftturninganglebothinthesagittalandcoronalplanes
AT tangyuchen 3dkillerturnangleintranstibialposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionisdeterminedbythegraftturninganglebothinthesagittalandcoronalplanes
AT liuzhongcheng 3dkillerturnangleintranstibialposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionisdeterminedbythegraftturninganglebothinthesagittalandcoronalplanes
AT pengbo 3dkillerturnangleintranstibialposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionisdeterminedbythegraftturninganglebothinthesagittalandcoronalplanes
AT dalijun 3dkillerturnangleintranstibialposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionisdeterminedbythegraftturninganglebothinthesagittalandcoronalplanes
AT yangjun 3dkillerturnangleintranstibialposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionisdeterminedbythegraftturninganglebothinthesagittalandcoronalplanes
AT liuxiaolong 3dkillerturnangleintranstibialposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionisdeterminedbythegraftturninganglebothinthesagittalandcoronalplanes
AT maming 3dkillerturnangleintranstibialposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionisdeterminedbythegraftturninganglebothinthesagittalandcoronalplanes
AT hanhua 3dkillerturnangleintranstibialposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionisdeterminedbythegraftturninganglebothinthesagittalandcoronalplanes
AT wumeng 3dkillerturnangleintranstibialposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionisdeterminedbythegraftturninganglebothinthesagittalandcoronalplanes
AT gengbin 3dkillerturnangleintranstibialposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionisdeterminedbythegraftturninganglebothinthesagittalandcoronalplanes
AT xiayayi 3dkillerturnangleintranstibialposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionisdeterminedbythegraftturninganglebothinthesagittalandcoronalplanes
AT tengyuanjun 3dkillerturnangleintranstibialposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionisdeterminedbythegraftturninganglebothinthesagittalandcoronalplanes