Cargando…

Mid‐ and Long‐Term Comparison Analysis of Two Approaches for the Treatment of Level III or Higher Lenke–Silva Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: Radical or Limited Surgery?

OBJECTIVE: As the population in general is living longer, less invasive adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) surgery that balances risks and benefits requires long‐term clinical outcomes to determine its strengths and weaknesses. We design a retrospective study to compare the postoperative mid‐ and lo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Zhibo, Zhang, Zhaoquan, Yang, Xiaochen, Zhao, Zhi, Li, Tao, Bi, Ni, Wang, Yingsong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35876210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13418
_version_ 1784791587009593344
author Song, Zhibo
Zhang, Zhaoquan
Yang, Xiaochen
Zhao, Zhi
Li, Tao
Bi, Ni
Wang, Yingsong
author_facet Song, Zhibo
Zhang, Zhaoquan
Yang, Xiaochen
Zhao, Zhi
Li, Tao
Bi, Ni
Wang, Yingsong
author_sort Song, Zhibo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: As the population in general is living longer, less invasive adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) surgery that balances risks and benefits requires long‐term clinical outcomes to determine its strengths and weaknesses. We design a retrospective study to compare the postoperative mid‐ and long‐term outcomes in terms of efficacy, surgical complications, and reoperation rate of patients with ADS treated with two different surgical approaches (long‐segment complete reconstruction or short‐segment limited intervention). METHODS: In this retrospective study, 78 patients with ADS (Lenke–Silva levels III or higher), who accepted surgical treatment at our hospital between June 2012 and June 2019 were included. These patients were assigned to the long‐segment radical group (complete decompression with deformity correction involves ≥3 segments) and the short‐segment limited group (symptomatic segment decompression involves <3 segments). In addition, general information such as age, gender, fixed segment number, efficacy, radiographic parameters, and reoperation rate of patients in the two groups were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to gender, follow‐up time, long‐term surgical complications and reoperation rate (P > 0.05). The mean age of patients in the long‐segment strategy group was 57.1 ± 7.9 years, with a mean number of fixed segments of 7.9 ± 2.4. The mean age of patients in the short‐segment strategy group was 60.8 ± 8.4 years, with a mean number of fixed segments of 1.4 ± 0.5. At the final follow‐up visit, the long‐segment radical group showed better results than the short‐segment limited group with regard to coronal Cobb angle, lumbar lordosis angle and sagittal balance (P < 0.05). The long‐segment strategy group had a higher implant‐related complication rate (P = 0.010); the adjacent segment‐related complication in the two groups showed no significant difference (P = 0.068). CONCLUSION: Considering the risk, rehabilitation pathway and costs of long‐segment radical surgery, short‐segment limited intervention is a better strategy for patients who cannot tolerate the long‐segment surgery, improving symptoms and maintaining efficacy in the mid‐ and long‐term, and not increasing the reoperation rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9483045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94830452022-09-29 Mid‐ and Long‐Term Comparison Analysis of Two Approaches for the Treatment of Level III or Higher Lenke–Silva Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: Radical or Limited Surgery? Song, Zhibo Zhang, Zhaoquan Yang, Xiaochen Zhao, Zhi Li, Tao Bi, Ni Wang, Yingsong Orthop Surg Clinical Articles OBJECTIVE: As the population in general is living longer, less invasive adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) surgery that balances risks and benefits requires long‐term clinical outcomes to determine its strengths and weaknesses. We design a retrospective study to compare the postoperative mid‐ and long‐term outcomes in terms of efficacy, surgical complications, and reoperation rate of patients with ADS treated with two different surgical approaches (long‐segment complete reconstruction or short‐segment limited intervention). METHODS: In this retrospective study, 78 patients with ADS (Lenke–Silva levels III or higher), who accepted surgical treatment at our hospital between June 2012 and June 2019 were included. These patients were assigned to the long‐segment radical group (complete decompression with deformity correction involves ≥3 segments) and the short‐segment limited group (symptomatic segment decompression involves <3 segments). In addition, general information such as age, gender, fixed segment number, efficacy, radiographic parameters, and reoperation rate of patients in the two groups were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to gender, follow‐up time, long‐term surgical complications and reoperation rate (P > 0.05). The mean age of patients in the long‐segment strategy group was 57.1 ± 7.9 years, with a mean number of fixed segments of 7.9 ± 2.4. The mean age of patients in the short‐segment strategy group was 60.8 ± 8.4 years, with a mean number of fixed segments of 1.4 ± 0.5. At the final follow‐up visit, the long‐segment radical group showed better results than the short‐segment limited group with regard to coronal Cobb angle, lumbar lordosis angle and sagittal balance (P < 0.05). The long‐segment strategy group had a higher implant‐related complication rate (P = 0.010); the adjacent segment‐related complication in the two groups showed no significant difference (P = 0.068). CONCLUSION: Considering the risk, rehabilitation pathway and costs of long‐segment radical surgery, short‐segment limited intervention is a better strategy for patients who cannot tolerate the long‐segment surgery, improving symptoms and maintaining efficacy in the mid‐ and long‐term, and not increasing the reoperation rate. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9483045/ /pubmed/35876210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13418 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Clinical Articles
Song, Zhibo
Zhang, Zhaoquan
Yang, Xiaochen
Zhao, Zhi
Li, Tao
Bi, Ni
Wang, Yingsong
Mid‐ and Long‐Term Comparison Analysis of Two Approaches for the Treatment of Level III or Higher Lenke–Silva Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: Radical or Limited Surgery?
title Mid‐ and Long‐Term Comparison Analysis of Two Approaches for the Treatment of Level III or Higher Lenke–Silva Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: Radical or Limited Surgery?
title_full Mid‐ and Long‐Term Comparison Analysis of Two Approaches for the Treatment of Level III or Higher Lenke–Silva Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: Radical or Limited Surgery?
title_fullStr Mid‐ and Long‐Term Comparison Analysis of Two Approaches for the Treatment of Level III or Higher Lenke–Silva Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: Radical or Limited Surgery?
title_full_unstemmed Mid‐ and Long‐Term Comparison Analysis of Two Approaches for the Treatment of Level III or Higher Lenke–Silva Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: Radical or Limited Surgery?
title_short Mid‐ and Long‐Term Comparison Analysis of Two Approaches for the Treatment of Level III or Higher Lenke–Silva Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: Radical or Limited Surgery?
title_sort mid‐ and long‐term comparison analysis of two approaches for the treatment of level iii or higher lenke–silva adult degenerative scoliosis: radical or limited surgery?
topic Clinical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35876210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13418
work_keys_str_mv AT songzhibo midandlongtermcomparisonanalysisoftwoapproachesforthetreatmentofleveliiiorhigherlenkesilvaadultdegenerativescoliosisradicalorlimitedsurgery
AT zhangzhaoquan midandlongtermcomparisonanalysisoftwoapproachesforthetreatmentofleveliiiorhigherlenkesilvaadultdegenerativescoliosisradicalorlimitedsurgery
AT yangxiaochen midandlongtermcomparisonanalysisoftwoapproachesforthetreatmentofleveliiiorhigherlenkesilvaadultdegenerativescoliosisradicalorlimitedsurgery
AT zhaozhi midandlongtermcomparisonanalysisoftwoapproachesforthetreatmentofleveliiiorhigherlenkesilvaadultdegenerativescoliosisradicalorlimitedsurgery
AT litao midandlongtermcomparisonanalysisoftwoapproachesforthetreatmentofleveliiiorhigherlenkesilvaadultdegenerativescoliosisradicalorlimitedsurgery
AT bini midandlongtermcomparisonanalysisoftwoapproachesforthetreatmentofleveliiiorhigherlenkesilvaadultdegenerativescoliosisradicalorlimitedsurgery
AT wangyingsong midandlongtermcomparisonanalysisoftwoapproachesforthetreatmentofleveliiiorhigherlenkesilvaadultdegenerativescoliosisradicalorlimitedsurgery