Cargando…
The Reliability and Reproducibility of a New Revised Edelson Classification
OBJECTIVE: Edelson classification is a 3D classification of proximal humeral fractures, but there is a scarcity of application of this classification in large samples, and the accuracy of classification was also not testified. The objective of this research was to verify whether a revised Edelson cl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35924693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13375 |
_version_ | 1784791587755130880 |
---|---|
author | Guo, Jialiang Dong, Weichong Zhou, Yali Shang, Meishuang Yang, Sifan Zhang, Xiaojuan Hou, Zhiyong Zhang, Yingze |
author_facet | Guo, Jialiang Dong, Weichong Zhou, Yali Shang, Meishuang Yang, Sifan Zhang, Xiaojuan Hou, Zhiyong Zhang, Yingze |
author_sort | Guo, Jialiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Edelson classification is a 3D classification of proximal humeral fractures, but there is a scarcity of application of this classification in large samples, and the accuracy of classification was also not testified. The objective of this research was to verify whether a revised Edelson classification produces satisfactory agreement for proximal humeral fracture classification in adult patients. METHODS: A total of 827 proximal humeral fractures (304 male and 520 female patients, 58.0 ± 16.2 years) were found retrospectively from January 2014 to December 2019, and classified according to the traditional and newly proposed Edelson classification. The three‐dimensional CT images were processed, rotated and visualized within software. Five shoulder surgeons classified each fracture. After data collection, radiographic classifications results were compared by inter‐ and intraobserver analysis with the method of weighted kappa coefficients. Fracture classification based on Edelson and revised Edelson classification was presented and compared. RESULTS: The mean k value for the interobserver reliability was 0.748 (range, 0.583 to 0.958) compared with Edelson classification (0.548, range, 0.48 to 0.635), indicating satisfactory agreement. The mean k value for intraobserver reliability was 0.906 (range, 0.823 to 0.943) compared with Edelson classification (0.762, range, 0.666 to 0.808), indicating excellent agreement when using the newly revised Edelson classification. The mechanism was categorized as the shoulder being in a position of forward flexion, abduction, and internal rotation in Edelson I‐IV and bicipital fractures. For the greater tuberosity fracture, the mechanism was classified into two mechanisms based on the presence of a combined dislocation. Bicipital groove fracture is a commonly observed fracture pattern, and included in the revised Edelson classification. CONCLUSIONS: The revised Edelson classification proposed was more in line with the injury mechanism of the fracture, was beneficial in identifying more fracture types such as bicipital groove fracture, and verified to be a good proximal humeral fracture classification with good reliability compared with the traditional Edelson classification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9483048 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94830482022-09-29 The Reliability and Reproducibility of a New Revised Edelson Classification Guo, Jialiang Dong, Weichong Zhou, Yali Shang, Meishuang Yang, Sifan Zhang, Xiaojuan Hou, Zhiyong Zhang, Yingze Orthop Surg Research Articles OBJECTIVE: Edelson classification is a 3D classification of proximal humeral fractures, but there is a scarcity of application of this classification in large samples, and the accuracy of classification was also not testified. The objective of this research was to verify whether a revised Edelson classification produces satisfactory agreement for proximal humeral fracture classification in adult patients. METHODS: A total of 827 proximal humeral fractures (304 male and 520 female patients, 58.0 ± 16.2 years) were found retrospectively from January 2014 to December 2019, and classified according to the traditional and newly proposed Edelson classification. The three‐dimensional CT images were processed, rotated and visualized within software. Five shoulder surgeons classified each fracture. After data collection, radiographic classifications results were compared by inter‐ and intraobserver analysis with the method of weighted kappa coefficients. Fracture classification based on Edelson and revised Edelson classification was presented and compared. RESULTS: The mean k value for the interobserver reliability was 0.748 (range, 0.583 to 0.958) compared with Edelson classification (0.548, range, 0.48 to 0.635), indicating satisfactory agreement. The mean k value for intraobserver reliability was 0.906 (range, 0.823 to 0.943) compared with Edelson classification (0.762, range, 0.666 to 0.808), indicating excellent agreement when using the newly revised Edelson classification. The mechanism was categorized as the shoulder being in a position of forward flexion, abduction, and internal rotation in Edelson I‐IV and bicipital fractures. For the greater tuberosity fracture, the mechanism was classified into two mechanisms based on the presence of a combined dislocation. Bicipital groove fracture is a commonly observed fracture pattern, and included in the revised Edelson classification. CONCLUSIONS: The revised Edelson classification proposed was more in line with the injury mechanism of the fracture, was beneficial in identifying more fracture types such as bicipital groove fracture, and verified to be a good proximal humeral fracture classification with good reliability compared with the traditional Edelson classification. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9483048/ /pubmed/35924693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13375 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Guo, Jialiang Dong, Weichong Zhou, Yali Shang, Meishuang Yang, Sifan Zhang, Xiaojuan Hou, Zhiyong Zhang, Yingze The Reliability and Reproducibility of a New Revised Edelson Classification |
title | The Reliability and Reproducibility of a New Revised Edelson Classification |
title_full | The Reliability and Reproducibility of a New Revised Edelson Classification |
title_fullStr | The Reliability and Reproducibility of a New Revised Edelson Classification |
title_full_unstemmed | The Reliability and Reproducibility of a New Revised Edelson Classification |
title_short | The Reliability and Reproducibility of a New Revised Edelson Classification |
title_sort | reliability and reproducibility of a new revised edelson classification |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35924693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13375 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guojialiang thereliabilityandreproducibilityofanewrevisededelsonclassification AT dongweichong thereliabilityandreproducibilityofanewrevisededelsonclassification AT zhouyali thereliabilityandreproducibilityofanewrevisededelsonclassification AT shangmeishuang thereliabilityandreproducibilityofanewrevisededelsonclassification AT yangsifan thereliabilityandreproducibilityofanewrevisededelsonclassification AT zhangxiaojuan thereliabilityandreproducibilityofanewrevisededelsonclassification AT houzhiyong thereliabilityandreproducibilityofanewrevisededelsonclassification AT zhangyingze thereliabilityandreproducibilityofanewrevisededelsonclassification AT guojialiang reliabilityandreproducibilityofanewrevisededelsonclassification AT dongweichong reliabilityandreproducibilityofanewrevisededelsonclassification AT zhouyali reliabilityandreproducibilityofanewrevisededelsonclassification AT shangmeishuang reliabilityandreproducibilityofanewrevisededelsonclassification AT yangsifan reliabilityandreproducibilityofanewrevisededelsonclassification AT zhangxiaojuan reliabilityandreproducibilityofanewrevisededelsonclassification AT houzhiyong reliabilityandreproducibilityofanewrevisededelsonclassification AT zhangyingze reliabilityandreproducibilityofanewrevisededelsonclassification |