Cargando…

A Mid‐term Follow‐up Study on the Reimplantation of Autoclaved Femoral and Tibial Components as Spacers for Treating Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE: Infection after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a rare but devastating complication. Different types of spaces have been used in two‐stage revision. The study aimed to evaluate the effect of autoclaved femoral and tibial components as spacers for treating periprosthetic infections after...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Peng, Zhu, Zhiqi, Tang, Xiangyang, Shi, Zhanjun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35894146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13402
_version_ 1784791588753375232
author Li, Peng
Zhu, Zhiqi
Tang, Xiangyang
Shi, Zhanjun
author_facet Li, Peng
Zhu, Zhiqi
Tang, Xiangyang
Shi, Zhanjun
author_sort Li, Peng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Infection after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a rare but devastating complication. Different types of spaces have been used in two‐stage revision. The study aimed to evaluate the effect of autoclaved femoral and tibial components as spacers for treating periprosthetic infections after TKA. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed for 13 patients (five males, eight females) with a mean age of 69 ± 6 (range, 57–80) years and suffering from periprosthetic infection after TKA. They were treated with unconventional two‐stage revision from May 2008 to June 2017. In the first‐stage surgery, the autoclaved femoral and tibial components were reimplanted with a new liner as a spacer after a thorough debridement. After 4–6 months, the second‐stage surgery was performed according to the patients' requirements. The knee society score (KSS) and knee range of motion (ROM) were assessed before and after surgery. The reinfection rate was calculated. RESULTS: The mean duration of follow‐up was 5.7 ± 2.1 (range, 3.1–8.8) years. Culture‐positive infections comprised 69% of the cohort. All patients were able to walk 24 h after the first stage surgery, and the knee ROM could reach 90° in 1 week. Two patients (15.4%) experienced an infection recurrence. One patient was reinfected 1 year after the first stage surgery. Another patient developed reinfection 3 years after surgery but did not choose re‐revision and died of pneumonia. Only one patient underwent the second stage revision. The remaining 10 patients refused to receive a new prosthesis. At the time of the final follow‐up, six patients had slight pain in the knee while walking, and one patient required crutches to walk. There were no signs of prosthesis dislocation, rupture, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or delayed wound healing. No radiolucent lines or osteolysis were found. The mean KSS improved from 51 ± 10 (range, 35–63) points preoperatively to 79 ± 5 (range, 60–85) points at the final follow‐up. The average ROM before and after the first stage surgery were 62° ± 29° (range, 10°–100°) and 104° ± 9° (range, 90°–120°) (t = 4.659, P < 0.01) respectively. The infection control rate was 84.6%. CONCLUSION: Reimplantation of the autoclaved original femoral and tibial components as an articulating spacer during the first stage surgery is a valuable addition for treating an infected TKA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9483052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94830522022-09-29 A Mid‐term Follow‐up Study on the Reimplantation of Autoclaved Femoral and Tibial Components as Spacers for Treating Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty Li, Peng Zhu, Zhiqi Tang, Xiangyang Shi, Zhanjun Orthop Surg Clinical Articles OBJECTIVE: Infection after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a rare but devastating complication. Different types of spaces have been used in two‐stage revision. The study aimed to evaluate the effect of autoclaved femoral and tibial components as spacers for treating periprosthetic infections after TKA. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed for 13 patients (five males, eight females) with a mean age of 69 ± 6 (range, 57–80) years and suffering from periprosthetic infection after TKA. They were treated with unconventional two‐stage revision from May 2008 to June 2017. In the first‐stage surgery, the autoclaved femoral and tibial components were reimplanted with a new liner as a spacer after a thorough debridement. After 4–6 months, the second‐stage surgery was performed according to the patients' requirements. The knee society score (KSS) and knee range of motion (ROM) were assessed before and after surgery. The reinfection rate was calculated. RESULTS: The mean duration of follow‐up was 5.7 ± 2.1 (range, 3.1–8.8) years. Culture‐positive infections comprised 69% of the cohort. All patients were able to walk 24 h after the first stage surgery, and the knee ROM could reach 90° in 1 week. Two patients (15.4%) experienced an infection recurrence. One patient was reinfected 1 year after the first stage surgery. Another patient developed reinfection 3 years after surgery but did not choose re‐revision and died of pneumonia. Only one patient underwent the second stage revision. The remaining 10 patients refused to receive a new prosthesis. At the time of the final follow‐up, six patients had slight pain in the knee while walking, and one patient required crutches to walk. There were no signs of prosthesis dislocation, rupture, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or delayed wound healing. No radiolucent lines or osteolysis were found. The mean KSS improved from 51 ± 10 (range, 35–63) points preoperatively to 79 ± 5 (range, 60–85) points at the final follow‐up. The average ROM before and after the first stage surgery were 62° ± 29° (range, 10°–100°) and 104° ± 9° (range, 90°–120°) (t = 4.659, P < 0.01) respectively. The infection control rate was 84.6%. CONCLUSION: Reimplantation of the autoclaved original femoral and tibial components as an articulating spacer during the first stage surgery is a valuable addition for treating an infected TKA. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9483052/ /pubmed/35894146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13402 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Clinical Articles
Li, Peng
Zhu, Zhiqi
Tang, Xiangyang
Shi, Zhanjun
A Mid‐term Follow‐up Study on the Reimplantation of Autoclaved Femoral and Tibial Components as Spacers for Treating Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty
title A Mid‐term Follow‐up Study on the Reimplantation of Autoclaved Femoral and Tibial Components as Spacers for Treating Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_full A Mid‐term Follow‐up Study on the Reimplantation of Autoclaved Femoral and Tibial Components as Spacers for Treating Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_fullStr A Mid‐term Follow‐up Study on the Reimplantation of Autoclaved Femoral and Tibial Components as Spacers for Treating Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed A Mid‐term Follow‐up Study on the Reimplantation of Autoclaved Femoral and Tibial Components as Spacers for Treating Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_short A Mid‐term Follow‐up Study on the Reimplantation of Autoclaved Femoral and Tibial Components as Spacers for Treating Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_sort mid‐term follow‐up study on the reimplantation of autoclaved femoral and tibial components as spacers for treating infected total knee arthroplasty
topic Clinical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35894146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13402
work_keys_str_mv AT lipeng amidtermfollowupstudyonthereimplantationofautoclavedfemoralandtibialcomponentsasspacersfortreatinginfectedtotalkneearthroplasty
AT zhuzhiqi amidtermfollowupstudyonthereimplantationofautoclavedfemoralandtibialcomponentsasspacersfortreatinginfectedtotalkneearthroplasty
AT tangxiangyang amidtermfollowupstudyonthereimplantationofautoclavedfemoralandtibialcomponentsasspacersfortreatinginfectedtotalkneearthroplasty
AT shizhanjun amidtermfollowupstudyonthereimplantationofautoclavedfemoralandtibialcomponentsasspacersfortreatinginfectedtotalkneearthroplasty
AT lipeng midtermfollowupstudyonthereimplantationofautoclavedfemoralandtibialcomponentsasspacersfortreatinginfectedtotalkneearthroplasty
AT zhuzhiqi midtermfollowupstudyonthereimplantationofautoclavedfemoralandtibialcomponentsasspacersfortreatinginfectedtotalkneearthroplasty
AT tangxiangyang midtermfollowupstudyonthereimplantationofautoclavedfemoralandtibialcomponentsasspacersfortreatinginfectedtotalkneearthroplasty
AT shizhanjun midtermfollowupstudyonthereimplantationofautoclavedfemoralandtibialcomponentsasspacersfortreatinginfectedtotalkneearthroplasty