Cargando…

Does Magical Thinking Bind or Separate Us? A Re-analysis of Data from Germany, India, South Korea, and Turkey

Martha Muchow, in collaboration with Heinz Werner, developed a questionnaire to collect data on magical thinking and practices in children and adolescents in Germany in the early 1900s. Three other studies (Watzlawik & Valsiner, 2012; Massoumi, 2019; Szarata, 2019) have used an English translati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Namdiero-Walsh, Audrey, Massoumi, Roja, Szarata, Valerie, Watzlawik, Meike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483281/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42087-022-00309-3
_version_ 1784791638594289664
author Namdiero-Walsh, Audrey
Massoumi, Roja
Szarata, Valerie
Watzlawik, Meike
author_facet Namdiero-Walsh, Audrey
Massoumi, Roja
Szarata, Valerie
Watzlawik, Meike
author_sort Namdiero-Walsh, Audrey
collection PubMed
description Martha Muchow, in collaboration with Heinz Werner, developed a questionnaire to collect data on magical thinking and practices in children and adolescents in Germany in the early 1900s. Three other studies (Watzlawik & Valsiner, 2012; Massoumi, 2019; Szarata, 2019) have used an English translation of this questionnaire to collect and analyse data on magical thinking and behaviour in the USA, Germany, India, Turkey, and South Korea. Using a cultural psychology and critical cross- “cultural” approach, this study combined and re-analysed both Massoumi in Karl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz, 2019 and Szarata in Freie Universitaet Berlin, 2019 pre-coded data (N = 488) on the magical practices from four countries: Germany, India, Turkey, and South Korea. A descriptive analysis and cross-tables (chi-square) for group comparisons were performed. The study aims to compare the similarities and differences of groups in different settings on how magical practice is applied (passively or actively), the internal and external motives and influencing factors behind magical thinking and practices, and the reactions to the outcomes of magical practice. The findings show that the participants’ country of origin played a role in who used magic; how and reasons for its application; its continued use and frequency of use in adulthood; reactions to their outcomes; and the motivating factors for magic application. Participants’ sex and the religious status only played a role in who used magic, reactions to their outcomes, and motives for their use. The current study adds support to the relevance of reanalysing data from historical periods in understanding how cultural phenomena move in time and space, and discusses directions for future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9483281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94832812022-09-19 Does Magical Thinking Bind or Separate Us? A Re-analysis of Data from Germany, India, South Korea, and Turkey Namdiero-Walsh, Audrey Massoumi, Roja Szarata, Valerie Watzlawik, Meike Hu Arenas Arena of Spirituality Martha Muchow, in collaboration with Heinz Werner, developed a questionnaire to collect data on magical thinking and practices in children and adolescents in Germany in the early 1900s. Three other studies (Watzlawik & Valsiner, 2012; Massoumi, 2019; Szarata, 2019) have used an English translation of this questionnaire to collect and analyse data on magical thinking and behaviour in the USA, Germany, India, Turkey, and South Korea. Using a cultural psychology and critical cross- “cultural” approach, this study combined and re-analysed both Massoumi in Karl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz, 2019 and Szarata in Freie Universitaet Berlin, 2019 pre-coded data (N = 488) on the magical practices from four countries: Germany, India, Turkey, and South Korea. A descriptive analysis and cross-tables (chi-square) for group comparisons were performed. The study aims to compare the similarities and differences of groups in different settings on how magical practice is applied (passively or actively), the internal and external motives and influencing factors behind magical thinking and practices, and the reactions to the outcomes of magical practice. The findings show that the participants’ country of origin played a role in who used magic; how and reasons for its application; its continued use and frequency of use in adulthood; reactions to their outcomes; and the motivating factors for magic application. Participants’ sex and the religious status only played a role in who used magic, reactions to their outcomes, and motives for their use. The current study adds support to the relevance of reanalysing data from historical periods in understanding how cultural phenomena move in time and space, and discusses directions for future research. Springer International Publishing 2022-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9483281/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42087-022-00309-3 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Arena of Spirituality
Namdiero-Walsh, Audrey
Massoumi, Roja
Szarata, Valerie
Watzlawik, Meike
Does Magical Thinking Bind or Separate Us? A Re-analysis of Data from Germany, India, South Korea, and Turkey
title Does Magical Thinking Bind or Separate Us? A Re-analysis of Data from Germany, India, South Korea, and Turkey
title_full Does Magical Thinking Bind or Separate Us? A Re-analysis of Data from Germany, India, South Korea, and Turkey
title_fullStr Does Magical Thinking Bind or Separate Us? A Re-analysis of Data from Germany, India, South Korea, and Turkey
title_full_unstemmed Does Magical Thinking Bind or Separate Us? A Re-analysis of Data from Germany, India, South Korea, and Turkey
title_short Does Magical Thinking Bind or Separate Us? A Re-analysis of Data from Germany, India, South Korea, and Turkey
title_sort does magical thinking bind or separate us? a re-analysis of data from germany, india, south korea, and turkey
topic Arena of Spirituality
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483281/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42087-022-00309-3
work_keys_str_mv AT namdierowalshaudrey doesmagicalthinkingbindorseparateusareanalysisofdatafromgermanyindiasouthkoreaandturkey
AT massoumiroja doesmagicalthinkingbindorseparateusareanalysisofdatafromgermanyindiasouthkoreaandturkey
AT szaratavalerie doesmagicalthinkingbindorseparateusareanalysisofdatafromgermanyindiasouthkoreaandturkey
AT watzlawikmeike doesmagicalthinkingbindorseparateusareanalysisofdatafromgermanyindiasouthkoreaandturkey