Cargando…
The follicular-phase depot GnRH agonist protocol results in a higher live birth rate without discernible differences in luteal function and child health versus the daily mid-luteal GnRH agonist protocol: a single-centre, retrospective, propensity score matched cohort study
BACKGROUND: The gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) has been used in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles for a long time. This paper evaluates the efficacy and safety of two commonly used protocols (follicular-phase depot GnRH-a protocol and daily mi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36123706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-01014-0 |
_version_ | 1784791688376483840 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Ying Zhao, Wenxian Han, Yifan Chen, Xin Xu, Shaoyuan Hu, Yueyue Diao, Honglu Zhang, Changjun |
author_facet | Zhang, Ying Zhao, Wenxian Han, Yifan Chen, Xin Xu, Shaoyuan Hu, Yueyue Diao, Honglu Zhang, Changjun |
author_sort | Zhang, Ying |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) has been used in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles for a long time. This paper evaluates the efficacy and safety of two commonly used protocols (follicular-phase depot GnRH-a protocol and daily mid-luteal long GnRH-a protocol) in normal responders undergoing IVF/ICSI using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. METHODS: A total of 6,816 infertile women treated within the period from January 2016 to September 2020 were stratified into cohorts. A total of 2,851 patients received the long-acting group (depot GnRH-a protocol), and 1,193 used the short-acting group (long GnRH-a protocol) after the data-selection process. PSM was utilized for sampling by up to 1:1 nearest neighbour matching to adjust the numerical difference and balance the confounders between groups. The primary outcome was the live birth rate (LBR). Multivariable logistic analysis was used to evaluate the difference between these two protocols in relation to the LBR. RESULT(S): In this study, 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to create a perfect match of 964 patients in each group. After matching, the blastocyst formation rates, oestradiol (E(2)) value on Day hCG + 9, progesterone (P) value on Day hCG + 9, implantation rates, clinical pregnancy rates, and LBR were more favourable in the depot GnRH-a protocol than in the long GnRH-a protocol (P < 0.05). However, the moderate or severe OHSS rates were higher in the depot group than in the long group (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in endometrial thickness, luteal support medication, early pregnancy loss rates, mid- and late-term pregnancy loss rates, or foetal malformation rates between the two protocols. CONCLUSION(S): Compared with the daily short-acting GnRH agonist protocol, the follicular-phase depot GnRH-a protocol might improve LBRs in normogonadotropic women without discernible differences in luteal function and child health. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12958-022-01014-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9483542 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94835422022-09-19 The follicular-phase depot GnRH agonist protocol results in a higher live birth rate without discernible differences in luteal function and child health versus the daily mid-luteal GnRH agonist protocol: a single-centre, retrospective, propensity score matched cohort study Zhang, Ying Zhao, Wenxian Han, Yifan Chen, Xin Xu, Shaoyuan Hu, Yueyue Diao, Honglu Zhang, Changjun Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: The gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) has been used in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles for a long time. This paper evaluates the efficacy and safety of two commonly used protocols (follicular-phase depot GnRH-a protocol and daily mid-luteal long GnRH-a protocol) in normal responders undergoing IVF/ICSI using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. METHODS: A total of 6,816 infertile women treated within the period from January 2016 to September 2020 were stratified into cohorts. A total of 2,851 patients received the long-acting group (depot GnRH-a protocol), and 1,193 used the short-acting group (long GnRH-a protocol) after the data-selection process. PSM was utilized for sampling by up to 1:1 nearest neighbour matching to adjust the numerical difference and balance the confounders between groups. The primary outcome was the live birth rate (LBR). Multivariable logistic analysis was used to evaluate the difference between these two protocols in relation to the LBR. RESULT(S): In this study, 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to create a perfect match of 964 patients in each group. After matching, the blastocyst formation rates, oestradiol (E(2)) value on Day hCG + 9, progesterone (P) value on Day hCG + 9, implantation rates, clinical pregnancy rates, and LBR were more favourable in the depot GnRH-a protocol than in the long GnRH-a protocol (P < 0.05). However, the moderate or severe OHSS rates were higher in the depot group than in the long group (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in endometrial thickness, luteal support medication, early pregnancy loss rates, mid- and late-term pregnancy loss rates, or foetal malformation rates between the two protocols. CONCLUSION(S): Compared with the daily short-acting GnRH agonist protocol, the follicular-phase depot GnRH-a protocol might improve LBRs in normogonadotropic women without discernible differences in luteal function and child health. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12958-022-01014-0. BioMed Central 2022-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9483542/ /pubmed/36123706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-01014-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Zhang, Ying Zhao, Wenxian Han, Yifan Chen, Xin Xu, Shaoyuan Hu, Yueyue Diao, Honglu Zhang, Changjun The follicular-phase depot GnRH agonist protocol results in a higher live birth rate without discernible differences in luteal function and child health versus the daily mid-luteal GnRH agonist protocol: a single-centre, retrospective, propensity score matched cohort study |
title | The follicular-phase depot GnRH agonist protocol results in a higher live birth rate without discernible differences in luteal function and child health versus the daily mid-luteal GnRH agonist protocol: a single-centre, retrospective, propensity score matched cohort study |
title_full | The follicular-phase depot GnRH agonist protocol results in a higher live birth rate without discernible differences in luteal function and child health versus the daily mid-luteal GnRH agonist protocol: a single-centre, retrospective, propensity score matched cohort study |
title_fullStr | The follicular-phase depot GnRH agonist protocol results in a higher live birth rate without discernible differences in luteal function and child health versus the daily mid-luteal GnRH agonist protocol: a single-centre, retrospective, propensity score matched cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | The follicular-phase depot GnRH agonist protocol results in a higher live birth rate without discernible differences in luteal function and child health versus the daily mid-luteal GnRH agonist protocol: a single-centre, retrospective, propensity score matched cohort study |
title_short | The follicular-phase depot GnRH agonist protocol results in a higher live birth rate without discernible differences in luteal function and child health versus the daily mid-luteal GnRH agonist protocol: a single-centre, retrospective, propensity score matched cohort study |
title_sort | follicular-phase depot gnrh agonist protocol results in a higher live birth rate without discernible differences in luteal function and child health versus the daily mid-luteal gnrh agonist protocol: a single-centre, retrospective, propensity score matched cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36123706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-01014-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangying thefollicularphasedepotgnrhagonistprotocolresultsinahigherlivebirthratewithoutdiscernibledifferencesinlutealfunctionandchildhealthversusthedailymidlutealgnrhagonistprotocolasinglecentreretrospectivepropensityscorematchedcohortstudy AT zhaowenxian thefollicularphasedepotgnrhagonistprotocolresultsinahigherlivebirthratewithoutdiscernibledifferencesinlutealfunctionandchildhealthversusthedailymidlutealgnrhagonistprotocolasinglecentreretrospectivepropensityscorematchedcohortstudy AT hanyifan thefollicularphasedepotgnrhagonistprotocolresultsinahigherlivebirthratewithoutdiscernibledifferencesinlutealfunctionandchildhealthversusthedailymidlutealgnrhagonistprotocolasinglecentreretrospectivepropensityscorematchedcohortstudy AT chenxin thefollicularphasedepotgnrhagonistprotocolresultsinahigherlivebirthratewithoutdiscernibledifferencesinlutealfunctionandchildhealthversusthedailymidlutealgnrhagonistprotocolasinglecentreretrospectivepropensityscorematchedcohortstudy AT xushaoyuan thefollicularphasedepotgnrhagonistprotocolresultsinahigherlivebirthratewithoutdiscernibledifferencesinlutealfunctionandchildhealthversusthedailymidlutealgnrhagonistprotocolasinglecentreretrospectivepropensityscorematchedcohortstudy AT huyueyue thefollicularphasedepotgnrhagonistprotocolresultsinahigherlivebirthratewithoutdiscernibledifferencesinlutealfunctionandchildhealthversusthedailymidlutealgnrhagonistprotocolasinglecentreretrospectivepropensityscorematchedcohortstudy AT diaohonglu thefollicularphasedepotgnrhagonistprotocolresultsinahigherlivebirthratewithoutdiscernibledifferencesinlutealfunctionandchildhealthversusthedailymidlutealgnrhagonistprotocolasinglecentreretrospectivepropensityscorematchedcohortstudy AT zhangchangjun thefollicularphasedepotgnrhagonistprotocolresultsinahigherlivebirthratewithoutdiscernibledifferencesinlutealfunctionandchildhealthversusthedailymidlutealgnrhagonistprotocolasinglecentreretrospectivepropensityscorematchedcohortstudy AT zhangying follicularphasedepotgnrhagonistprotocolresultsinahigherlivebirthratewithoutdiscernibledifferencesinlutealfunctionandchildhealthversusthedailymidlutealgnrhagonistprotocolasinglecentreretrospectivepropensityscorematchedcohortstudy AT zhaowenxian follicularphasedepotgnrhagonistprotocolresultsinahigherlivebirthratewithoutdiscernibledifferencesinlutealfunctionandchildhealthversusthedailymidlutealgnrhagonistprotocolasinglecentreretrospectivepropensityscorematchedcohortstudy AT hanyifan follicularphasedepotgnrhagonistprotocolresultsinahigherlivebirthratewithoutdiscernibledifferencesinlutealfunctionandchildhealthversusthedailymidlutealgnrhagonistprotocolasinglecentreretrospectivepropensityscorematchedcohortstudy AT chenxin follicularphasedepotgnrhagonistprotocolresultsinahigherlivebirthratewithoutdiscernibledifferencesinlutealfunctionandchildhealthversusthedailymidlutealgnrhagonistprotocolasinglecentreretrospectivepropensityscorematchedcohortstudy AT xushaoyuan follicularphasedepotgnrhagonistprotocolresultsinahigherlivebirthratewithoutdiscernibledifferencesinlutealfunctionandchildhealthversusthedailymidlutealgnrhagonistprotocolasinglecentreretrospectivepropensityscorematchedcohortstudy AT huyueyue follicularphasedepotgnrhagonistprotocolresultsinahigherlivebirthratewithoutdiscernibledifferencesinlutealfunctionandchildhealthversusthedailymidlutealgnrhagonistprotocolasinglecentreretrospectivepropensityscorematchedcohortstudy AT diaohonglu follicularphasedepotgnrhagonistprotocolresultsinahigherlivebirthratewithoutdiscernibledifferencesinlutealfunctionandchildhealthversusthedailymidlutealgnrhagonistprotocolasinglecentreretrospectivepropensityscorematchedcohortstudy AT zhangchangjun follicularphasedepotgnrhagonistprotocolresultsinahigherlivebirthratewithoutdiscernibledifferencesinlutealfunctionandchildhealthversusthedailymidlutealgnrhagonistprotocolasinglecentreretrospectivepropensityscorematchedcohortstudy |