Cargando…
An iPS‐derived in vitro model of human atrial conduction
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in the United States, affecting approximately 1 in 10 adults, and its prevalence is expected to rise as the population ages. Treatment options for AF are limited; moreover, the development of new treatments is hindered by limited (1) knowledge r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36117385 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15407 |
_version_ | 1784791703293526016 |
---|---|
author | Biendarra‐Tiegs, Sherri M. Yechikov, Sergey Shergill, Bhupinder Brumback, Brittany Takahashi, Kentaro Shirure, Venktesh S. Gonzalez, Ruth Estelle Houshmand, Laura Zhong, Denise Weng, Kuo‐Chan Silva, Jon Smith, Timothy W. Rentschler, Stacey L. George, Steven C. |
author_facet | Biendarra‐Tiegs, Sherri M. Yechikov, Sergey Shergill, Bhupinder Brumback, Brittany Takahashi, Kentaro Shirure, Venktesh S. Gonzalez, Ruth Estelle Houshmand, Laura Zhong, Denise Weng, Kuo‐Chan Silva, Jon Smith, Timothy W. Rentschler, Stacey L. George, Steven C. |
author_sort | Biendarra‐Tiegs, Sherri M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in the United States, affecting approximately 1 in 10 adults, and its prevalence is expected to rise as the population ages. Treatment options for AF are limited; moreover, the development of new treatments is hindered by limited (1) knowledge regarding human atrial electrophysiological endpoints (e.g., conduction velocity [CV]) and (2) accurate experimental models. Here, we measured the CV and refractory period, and subsequently calculated the conduction wavelength, in vivo (four subjects with AF and four controls), and ex vivo (atrial slices from human hearts). Then, we created an in vitro model of human atrial conduction using induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells. This model consisted of iPS‐derived human atrial cardiomyocytes plated onto a micropatterned linear 1D spiral design of Matrigel. The CV (34–41 cm/s) of the in vitro model was nearly five times faster than 2D controls (7–9 cm/s) and similar to in vivo (40–64 cm/s) and ex vivo (28–51 cm/s) measurements. Our iPS‐derived in vitro model recapitulates key features of in vivo atrial conduction and may be a useful methodology to enhance our understanding of AF and model patient‐specific disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9483613 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94836132022-09-29 An iPS‐derived in vitro model of human atrial conduction Biendarra‐Tiegs, Sherri M. Yechikov, Sergey Shergill, Bhupinder Brumback, Brittany Takahashi, Kentaro Shirure, Venktesh S. Gonzalez, Ruth Estelle Houshmand, Laura Zhong, Denise Weng, Kuo‐Chan Silva, Jon Smith, Timothy W. Rentschler, Stacey L. George, Steven C. Physiol Rep Original Articles Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in the United States, affecting approximately 1 in 10 adults, and its prevalence is expected to rise as the population ages. Treatment options for AF are limited; moreover, the development of new treatments is hindered by limited (1) knowledge regarding human atrial electrophysiological endpoints (e.g., conduction velocity [CV]) and (2) accurate experimental models. Here, we measured the CV and refractory period, and subsequently calculated the conduction wavelength, in vivo (four subjects with AF and four controls), and ex vivo (atrial slices from human hearts). Then, we created an in vitro model of human atrial conduction using induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells. This model consisted of iPS‐derived human atrial cardiomyocytes plated onto a micropatterned linear 1D spiral design of Matrigel. The CV (34–41 cm/s) of the in vitro model was nearly five times faster than 2D controls (7–9 cm/s) and similar to in vivo (40–64 cm/s) and ex vivo (28–51 cm/s) measurements. Our iPS‐derived in vitro model recapitulates key features of in vivo atrial conduction and may be a useful methodology to enhance our understanding of AF and model patient‐specific disease. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9483613/ /pubmed/36117385 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15407 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Biendarra‐Tiegs, Sherri M. Yechikov, Sergey Shergill, Bhupinder Brumback, Brittany Takahashi, Kentaro Shirure, Venktesh S. Gonzalez, Ruth Estelle Houshmand, Laura Zhong, Denise Weng, Kuo‐Chan Silva, Jon Smith, Timothy W. Rentschler, Stacey L. George, Steven C. An iPS‐derived in vitro model of human atrial conduction |
title | An iPS‐derived in vitro model of human atrial conduction |
title_full | An iPS‐derived in vitro model of human atrial conduction |
title_fullStr | An iPS‐derived in vitro model of human atrial conduction |
title_full_unstemmed | An iPS‐derived in vitro model of human atrial conduction |
title_short | An iPS‐derived in vitro model of human atrial conduction |
title_sort | ips‐derived in vitro model of human atrial conduction |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36117385 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15407 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT biendarratiegssherrim anipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction AT yechikovsergey anipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction AT shergillbhupinder anipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction AT brumbackbrittany anipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction AT takahashikentaro anipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction AT shirurevenkteshs anipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction AT gonzalezruthestelle anipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction AT houshmandlaura anipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction AT zhongdenise anipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction AT wengkuochan anipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction AT silvajon anipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction AT smithtimothyw anipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction AT rentschlerstaceyl anipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction AT georgestevenc anipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction AT biendarratiegssherrim ipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction AT yechikovsergey ipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction AT shergillbhupinder ipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction AT brumbackbrittany ipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction AT takahashikentaro ipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction AT shirurevenkteshs ipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction AT gonzalezruthestelle ipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction AT houshmandlaura ipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction AT zhongdenise ipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction AT wengkuochan ipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction AT silvajon ipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction AT smithtimothyw ipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction AT rentschlerstaceyl ipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction AT georgestevenc ipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction |