Cargando…

An iPS‐derived in vitro model of human atrial conduction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in the United States, affecting approximately 1 in 10 adults, and its prevalence is expected to rise as the population ages. Treatment options for AF are limited; moreover, the development of new treatments is hindered by limited (1) knowledge r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biendarra‐Tiegs, Sherri M., Yechikov, Sergey, Shergill, Bhupinder, Brumback, Brittany, Takahashi, Kentaro, Shirure, Venktesh S., Gonzalez, Ruth Estelle, Houshmand, Laura, Zhong, Denise, Weng, Kuo‐Chan, Silva, Jon, Smith, Timothy W., Rentschler, Stacey L., George, Steven C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36117385
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15407
_version_ 1784791703293526016
author Biendarra‐Tiegs, Sherri M.
Yechikov, Sergey
Shergill, Bhupinder
Brumback, Brittany
Takahashi, Kentaro
Shirure, Venktesh S.
Gonzalez, Ruth Estelle
Houshmand, Laura
Zhong, Denise
Weng, Kuo‐Chan
Silva, Jon
Smith, Timothy W.
Rentschler, Stacey L.
George, Steven C.
author_facet Biendarra‐Tiegs, Sherri M.
Yechikov, Sergey
Shergill, Bhupinder
Brumback, Brittany
Takahashi, Kentaro
Shirure, Venktesh S.
Gonzalez, Ruth Estelle
Houshmand, Laura
Zhong, Denise
Weng, Kuo‐Chan
Silva, Jon
Smith, Timothy W.
Rentschler, Stacey L.
George, Steven C.
author_sort Biendarra‐Tiegs, Sherri M.
collection PubMed
description Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in the United States, affecting approximately 1 in 10 adults, and its prevalence is expected to rise as the population ages. Treatment options for AF are limited; moreover, the development of new treatments is hindered by limited (1) knowledge regarding human atrial electrophysiological endpoints (e.g., conduction velocity [CV]) and (2) accurate experimental models. Here, we measured the CV and refractory period, and subsequently calculated the conduction wavelength, in vivo (four subjects with AF and four controls), and ex vivo (atrial slices from human hearts). Then, we created an in vitro model of human atrial conduction using induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells. This model consisted of iPS‐derived human atrial cardiomyocytes plated onto a micropatterned linear 1D spiral design of Matrigel. The CV (34–41 cm/s) of the in vitro model was nearly five times faster than 2D controls (7–9 cm/s) and similar to in vivo (40–64 cm/s) and ex vivo (28–51 cm/s) measurements. Our iPS‐derived in vitro model recapitulates key features of in vivo atrial conduction and may be a useful methodology to enhance our understanding of AF and model patient‐specific disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9483613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94836132022-09-29 An iPS‐derived in vitro model of human atrial conduction Biendarra‐Tiegs, Sherri M. Yechikov, Sergey Shergill, Bhupinder Brumback, Brittany Takahashi, Kentaro Shirure, Venktesh S. Gonzalez, Ruth Estelle Houshmand, Laura Zhong, Denise Weng, Kuo‐Chan Silva, Jon Smith, Timothy W. Rentschler, Stacey L. George, Steven C. Physiol Rep Original Articles Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in the United States, affecting approximately 1 in 10 adults, and its prevalence is expected to rise as the population ages. Treatment options for AF are limited; moreover, the development of new treatments is hindered by limited (1) knowledge regarding human atrial electrophysiological endpoints (e.g., conduction velocity [CV]) and (2) accurate experimental models. Here, we measured the CV and refractory period, and subsequently calculated the conduction wavelength, in vivo (four subjects with AF and four controls), and ex vivo (atrial slices from human hearts). Then, we created an in vitro model of human atrial conduction using induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells. This model consisted of iPS‐derived human atrial cardiomyocytes plated onto a micropatterned linear 1D spiral design of Matrigel. The CV (34–41 cm/s) of the in vitro model was nearly five times faster than 2D controls (7–9 cm/s) and similar to in vivo (40–64 cm/s) and ex vivo (28–51 cm/s) measurements. Our iPS‐derived in vitro model recapitulates key features of in vivo atrial conduction and may be a useful methodology to enhance our understanding of AF and model patient‐specific disease. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9483613/ /pubmed/36117385 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15407 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Biendarra‐Tiegs, Sherri M.
Yechikov, Sergey
Shergill, Bhupinder
Brumback, Brittany
Takahashi, Kentaro
Shirure, Venktesh S.
Gonzalez, Ruth Estelle
Houshmand, Laura
Zhong, Denise
Weng, Kuo‐Chan
Silva, Jon
Smith, Timothy W.
Rentschler, Stacey L.
George, Steven C.
An iPS‐derived in vitro model of human atrial conduction
title An iPS‐derived in vitro model of human atrial conduction
title_full An iPS‐derived in vitro model of human atrial conduction
title_fullStr An iPS‐derived in vitro model of human atrial conduction
title_full_unstemmed An iPS‐derived in vitro model of human atrial conduction
title_short An iPS‐derived in vitro model of human atrial conduction
title_sort ips‐derived in vitro model of human atrial conduction
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36117385
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15407
work_keys_str_mv AT biendarratiegssherrim anipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction
AT yechikovsergey anipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction
AT shergillbhupinder anipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction
AT brumbackbrittany anipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction
AT takahashikentaro anipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction
AT shirurevenkteshs anipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction
AT gonzalezruthestelle anipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction
AT houshmandlaura anipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction
AT zhongdenise anipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction
AT wengkuochan anipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction
AT silvajon anipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction
AT smithtimothyw anipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction
AT rentschlerstaceyl anipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction
AT georgestevenc anipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction
AT biendarratiegssherrim ipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction
AT yechikovsergey ipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction
AT shergillbhupinder ipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction
AT brumbackbrittany ipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction
AT takahashikentaro ipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction
AT shirurevenkteshs ipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction
AT gonzalezruthestelle ipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction
AT houshmandlaura ipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction
AT zhongdenise ipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction
AT wengkuochan ipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction
AT silvajon ipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction
AT smithtimothyw ipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction
AT rentschlerstaceyl ipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction
AT georgestevenc ipsderivedinvitromodelofhumanatrialconduction