Cargando…

A direct comparison of voice pitch processing in acoustic and electric hearing

In single-sided deafness patients fitted with a cochlear implant (CI) in the affected ear and preserved normal hearing in the other ear, acoustic and electric hearing can be directly compared without the need for an external control group. Although poor pitch perception is a crucial limitation when...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steinmetzger, Kurt, Meinhardt, Bastian, Praetorius, Mark, Andermann, Martin, Rupp, André
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36113196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103188
_version_ 1784791708252241920
author Steinmetzger, Kurt
Meinhardt, Bastian
Praetorius, Mark
Andermann, Martin
Rupp, André
author_facet Steinmetzger, Kurt
Meinhardt, Bastian
Praetorius, Mark
Andermann, Martin
Rupp, André
author_sort Steinmetzger, Kurt
collection PubMed
description In single-sided deafness patients fitted with a cochlear implant (CI) in the affected ear and preserved normal hearing in the other ear, acoustic and electric hearing can be directly compared without the need for an external control group. Although poor pitch perception is a crucial limitation when listening through CIs, it remains unclear how exactly the cortical processing of pitch information differs between acoustic and electric hearing. Hence, we separately presented both ears of 20 of these patients with vowel sequences in which the pitch contours were either repetitive or variable, while simultaneously recording functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and EEG data. Overall, the results showed smaller and delayed auditory cortex activity in electric hearing, particularly for the P2 event-related potential component, which appears to reflect the processing of voice pitch information. Both the fNIRS data and EEG source reconstructions furthermore showed that vowel sequences with variable pitch contours evoked additional activity in posterior right auditory cortex in electric but not acoustic hearing. This surprising discrepancy demonstrates, firstly, that the acoustic detail transmitted by CIs is sufficient to distinguish between speech sounds that only vary regarding their pitch information. Secondly, the absence of a condition difference when stimulating the normal-hearing ears suggests a saturation of cortical activity levels following unilateral deafness. Taken together, these results provide strong evidence in favour of using CIs in this patient group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9483634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94836342022-09-20 A direct comparison of voice pitch processing in acoustic and electric hearing Steinmetzger, Kurt Meinhardt, Bastian Praetorius, Mark Andermann, Martin Rupp, André Neuroimage Clin Regular Article In single-sided deafness patients fitted with a cochlear implant (CI) in the affected ear and preserved normal hearing in the other ear, acoustic and electric hearing can be directly compared without the need for an external control group. Although poor pitch perception is a crucial limitation when listening through CIs, it remains unclear how exactly the cortical processing of pitch information differs between acoustic and electric hearing. Hence, we separately presented both ears of 20 of these patients with vowel sequences in which the pitch contours were either repetitive or variable, while simultaneously recording functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and EEG data. Overall, the results showed smaller and delayed auditory cortex activity in electric hearing, particularly for the P2 event-related potential component, which appears to reflect the processing of voice pitch information. Both the fNIRS data and EEG source reconstructions furthermore showed that vowel sequences with variable pitch contours evoked additional activity in posterior right auditory cortex in electric but not acoustic hearing. This surprising discrepancy demonstrates, firstly, that the acoustic detail transmitted by CIs is sufficient to distinguish between speech sounds that only vary regarding their pitch information. Secondly, the absence of a condition difference when stimulating the normal-hearing ears suggests a saturation of cortical activity levels following unilateral deafness. Taken together, these results provide strong evidence in favour of using CIs in this patient group. Elsevier 2022-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9483634/ /pubmed/36113196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103188 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Article
Steinmetzger, Kurt
Meinhardt, Bastian
Praetorius, Mark
Andermann, Martin
Rupp, André
A direct comparison of voice pitch processing in acoustic and electric hearing
title A direct comparison of voice pitch processing in acoustic and electric hearing
title_full A direct comparison of voice pitch processing in acoustic and electric hearing
title_fullStr A direct comparison of voice pitch processing in acoustic and electric hearing
title_full_unstemmed A direct comparison of voice pitch processing in acoustic and electric hearing
title_short A direct comparison of voice pitch processing in acoustic and electric hearing
title_sort direct comparison of voice pitch processing in acoustic and electric hearing
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36113196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103188
work_keys_str_mv AT steinmetzgerkurt adirectcomparisonofvoicepitchprocessinginacousticandelectrichearing
AT meinhardtbastian adirectcomparisonofvoicepitchprocessinginacousticandelectrichearing
AT praetoriusmark adirectcomparisonofvoicepitchprocessinginacousticandelectrichearing
AT andermannmartin adirectcomparisonofvoicepitchprocessinginacousticandelectrichearing
AT ruppandre adirectcomparisonofvoicepitchprocessinginacousticandelectrichearing
AT steinmetzgerkurt directcomparisonofvoicepitchprocessinginacousticandelectrichearing
AT meinhardtbastian directcomparisonofvoicepitchprocessinginacousticandelectrichearing
AT praetoriusmark directcomparisonofvoicepitchprocessinginacousticandelectrichearing
AT andermannmartin directcomparisonofvoicepitchprocessinginacousticandelectrichearing
AT ruppandre directcomparisonofvoicepitchprocessinginacousticandelectrichearing