Cargando…

Neurology resident EEG training in Europe

OBJECTIVE: To detail current European EEG education practices and compare European and U.S. EEG teaching systems. METHODS: A 19-question online survey focused on EEG clinical practices and residency training was emailed to all 47 European Academy of Neurology Societies. RESULTS: Thirty-two (68 %) ou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nascimento, Fábio A., Gavvala, Jay R., Tankisi, Hatice, Beniczky, Sándor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36133398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2022.08.001
_version_ 1784791733645606912
author Nascimento, Fábio A.
Gavvala, Jay R.
Tankisi, Hatice
Beniczky, Sándor
author_facet Nascimento, Fábio A.
Gavvala, Jay R.
Tankisi, Hatice
Beniczky, Sándor
author_sort Nascimento, Fábio A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To detail current European EEG education practices and compare European and U.S. EEG teaching systems. METHODS: A 19-question online survey focused on EEG clinical practices and residency training was emailed to all 47 European Academy of Neurology Societies. RESULTS: Thirty-two (68 %) out of the 47 Societies completed the survey. In half of countries, general neurologists are either among the providers or the only providers who typically read EEGs. The number of weeks devoted to EEG learning required to graduate ranged from none to 26, and it was expected to be continuous in one country. In most countries (n = 17/32), trainees read >40 EEGs per EEG rotation, and the most commonly interpreted studies are routine and prolonged routine EEGs. Rotations involve clinic/outpatient (90 %), epilepsy monitoring unit/inpatient (60 %), or both (50 %). Roughly half of countries do not use objective measures to assess EEG competency. The most reported educational methods are teaching during EEG rotation and yearly didactics, and the most reported education barriers are insufficient didactics and insufficient EEG exposure. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest neurology educators in Europe, especially in those countries where EEGs are read by general neurologists, consider ensuring that residency EEG learning is mandatory and establishing objective measures in teaching and evaluating competency. SIGNIFICANCE: Similar to the U.S., neurology resident EEG training in Europe is highly variable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9483746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94837462022-09-20 Neurology resident EEG training in Europe Nascimento, Fábio A. Gavvala, Jay R. Tankisi, Hatice Beniczky, Sándor Clin Neurophysiol Pract Research Paper OBJECTIVE: To detail current European EEG education practices and compare European and U.S. EEG teaching systems. METHODS: A 19-question online survey focused on EEG clinical practices and residency training was emailed to all 47 European Academy of Neurology Societies. RESULTS: Thirty-two (68 %) out of the 47 Societies completed the survey. In half of countries, general neurologists are either among the providers or the only providers who typically read EEGs. The number of weeks devoted to EEG learning required to graduate ranged from none to 26, and it was expected to be continuous in one country. In most countries (n = 17/32), trainees read >40 EEGs per EEG rotation, and the most commonly interpreted studies are routine and prolonged routine EEGs. Rotations involve clinic/outpatient (90 %), epilepsy monitoring unit/inpatient (60 %), or both (50 %). Roughly half of countries do not use objective measures to assess EEG competency. The most reported educational methods are teaching during EEG rotation and yearly didactics, and the most reported education barriers are insufficient didactics and insufficient EEG exposure. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest neurology educators in Europe, especially in those countries where EEGs are read by general neurologists, consider ensuring that residency EEG learning is mandatory and establishing objective measures in teaching and evaluating competency. SIGNIFICANCE: Similar to the U.S., neurology resident EEG training in Europe is highly variable. Elsevier 2022-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9483746/ /pubmed/36133398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2022.08.001 Text en © 2022 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Nascimento, Fábio A.
Gavvala, Jay R.
Tankisi, Hatice
Beniczky, Sándor
Neurology resident EEG training in Europe
title Neurology resident EEG training in Europe
title_full Neurology resident EEG training in Europe
title_fullStr Neurology resident EEG training in Europe
title_full_unstemmed Neurology resident EEG training in Europe
title_short Neurology resident EEG training in Europe
title_sort neurology resident eeg training in europe
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36133398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2022.08.001
work_keys_str_mv AT nascimentofabioa neurologyresidenteegtrainingineurope
AT gavvalajayr neurologyresidenteegtrainingineurope
AT tankisihatice neurologyresidenteegtrainingineurope
AT beniczkysandor neurologyresidenteegtrainingineurope