Cargando…

Measuring what matters: identifying assessments that reflect learning on the core surgical clerkship

PURPOSE: There are various assessments used during the core surgical clerkship (CSC), each of which may be influenced by factors external to the CSC or have inherent biases from an equity lens. In particular, the National Board of Medical Examiners’ Clinical Subject Exams (“Shelf”) is used heavily a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mikulski, Matthew F., Beckerman, Ziv, Jacques, Zachary L., Terzo, Madison, Brown, Kimberly M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38013711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s44186-022-00047-8
_version_ 1784791760773316608
author Mikulski, Matthew F.
Beckerman, Ziv
Jacques, Zachary L.
Terzo, Madison
Brown, Kimberly M.
author_facet Mikulski, Matthew F.
Beckerman, Ziv
Jacques, Zachary L.
Terzo, Madison
Brown, Kimberly M.
author_sort Mikulski, Matthew F.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: There are various assessments used during the core surgical clerkship (CSC), each of which may be influenced by factors external to the CSC or have inherent biases from an equity lens. In particular, the National Board of Medical Examiners’ Clinical Subject Exams (“Shelf”) is used heavily and may not reflect clerkship curriculum or clinical learning. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of medical student characteristics and assessments during the CSC from July 2017-June 2021. Assessment methods included: subjective Clinical Performance Assessments (CPA), Shelf, Objective Structured Clinical Examinations, and a short-answer in-house examination (IHE) culminating in a Final Grade (FG) of Honors/Pass/Fail. A Shelf score threshold for Honors was added in academic years 2020–2021. Descriptive, univariate, and multivariable logistic and linear regression statistics were utilized. RESULTS: We reviewed records of 192 students. Of these, 107 (55.7%) were female, median age was 24 [IQR: 23–26] years, and most were White/Caucasian (N = 106, 55.2%). Univariate analysis showed the number of Exceeds Expectations obtained on CPA to be influenced by surgical subspecialty taken (p = 0.013) and academic year (p < 0.001). Shelf was influenced by students’ race (p = 0.009), timing of CSC before or after Internal Medicine (67.9 ± 7.3 vs 72.9 ± 7.1, p < 0.001), and Term taken (increasing from 66.0 ± 8.7 to 73.4 ± 7.5, p < 0.001). IHE scores did not have any external associations. After adjustment with multivariable logistic and linear regressions, CPA and IHE did not have external associations, but higher scores were obtained on Shelf exam in Terms 3, 5, and 6 (by 4.62 [95% CI 0.86–8.37], 4.92 [95% CI 0.53–9.31], and 7.56 [95% CI 2.81–12.31] points, respectively. Odds of FG honors were lower when Shelf threshold was implemented (OR 0.17 [95% CI 0.06–0.50]), and increased as students got older (OR 1.14 [95% CI 1.01–1.30]) or on specific subspecialties, such as vascular surgery (OR 7.06 [95% CI 1.21–41.26]). CONCLUSIONS: The Shelf is substantially influenced by temporal associations across Terms and timing in relation to other clerkships, such as Internal Medicine. An IHE reflective of a clerkship’s specified curriculum may be a more equitable summative assessment of the learning that occurs from the CSC curriculum, with fewer biases or influences external to the CSC. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44186-022-00047-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9483865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94838652022-09-19 Measuring what matters: identifying assessments that reflect learning on the core surgical clerkship Mikulski, Matthew F. Beckerman, Ziv Jacques, Zachary L. Terzo, Madison Brown, Kimberly M. Global Surg Educ Original Article PURPOSE: There are various assessments used during the core surgical clerkship (CSC), each of which may be influenced by factors external to the CSC or have inherent biases from an equity lens. In particular, the National Board of Medical Examiners’ Clinical Subject Exams (“Shelf”) is used heavily and may not reflect clerkship curriculum or clinical learning. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of medical student characteristics and assessments during the CSC from July 2017-June 2021. Assessment methods included: subjective Clinical Performance Assessments (CPA), Shelf, Objective Structured Clinical Examinations, and a short-answer in-house examination (IHE) culminating in a Final Grade (FG) of Honors/Pass/Fail. A Shelf score threshold for Honors was added in academic years 2020–2021. Descriptive, univariate, and multivariable logistic and linear regression statistics were utilized. RESULTS: We reviewed records of 192 students. Of these, 107 (55.7%) were female, median age was 24 [IQR: 23–26] years, and most were White/Caucasian (N = 106, 55.2%). Univariate analysis showed the number of Exceeds Expectations obtained on CPA to be influenced by surgical subspecialty taken (p = 0.013) and academic year (p < 0.001). Shelf was influenced by students’ race (p = 0.009), timing of CSC before or after Internal Medicine (67.9 ± 7.3 vs 72.9 ± 7.1, p < 0.001), and Term taken (increasing from 66.0 ± 8.7 to 73.4 ± 7.5, p < 0.001). IHE scores did not have any external associations. After adjustment with multivariable logistic and linear regressions, CPA and IHE did not have external associations, but higher scores were obtained on Shelf exam in Terms 3, 5, and 6 (by 4.62 [95% CI 0.86–8.37], 4.92 [95% CI 0.53–9.31], and 7.56 [95% CI 2.81–12.31] points, respectively. Odds of FG honors were lower when Shelf threshold was implemented (OR 0.17 [95% CI 0.06–0.50]), and increased as students got older (OR 1.14 [95% CI 1.01–1.30]) or on specific subspecialties, such as vascular surgery (OR 7.06 [95% CI 1.21–41.26]). CONCLUSIONS: The Shelf is substantially influenced by temporal associations across Terms and timing in relation to other clerkships, such as Internal Medicine. An IHE reflective of a clerkship’s specified curriculum may be a more equitable summative assessment of the learning that occurs from the CSC curriculum, with fewer biases or influences external to the CSC. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44186-022-00047-8. Springer US 2022-09-19 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9483865/ /pubmed/38013711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s44186-022-00047-8 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Association for Surgical Education 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mikulski, Matthew F.
Beckerman, Ziv
Jacques, Zachary L.
Terzo, Madison
Brown, Kimberly M.
Measuring what matters: identifying assessments that reflect learning on the core surgical clerkship
title Measuring what matters: identifying assessments that reflect learning on the core surgical clerkship
title_full Measuring what matters: identifying assessments that reflect learning on the core surgical clerkship
title_fullStr Measuring what matters: identifying assessments that reflect learning on the core surgical clerkship
title_full_unstemmed Measuring what matters: identifying assessments that reflect learning on the core surgical clerkship
title_short Measuring what matters: identifying assessments that reflect learning on the core surgical clerkship
title_sort measuring what matters: identifying assessments that reflect learning on the core surgical clerkship
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38013711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s44186-022-00047-8
work_keys_str_mv AT mikulskimatthewf measuringwhatmattersidentifyingassessmentsthatreflectlearningonthecoresurgicalclerkship
AT beckermanziv measuringwhatmattersidentifyingassessmentsthatreflectlearningonthecoresurgicalclerkship
AT jacqueszacharyl measuringwhatmattersidentifyingassessmentsthatreflectlearningonthecoresurgicalclerkship
AT terzomadison measuringwhatmattersidentifyingassessmentsthatreflectlearningonthecoresurgicalclerkship
AT brownkimberlym measuringwhatmattersidentifyingassessmentsthatreflectlearningonthecoresurgicalclerkship