Cargando…

PM(2.5) Forecast in Korea using the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Model

The National Institute of Environmental Research, under the Ministry of Environment of Korea, provides two-day forecasts, through AirKorea, of the concentration of particulate matter with diameters of ≤ 2.5 μm (PM(2.5)) in terms of four grades (low, moderate, high, and very high) over 19 districts n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ho, Chang-Hoi, Park, Ingyu, Kim, Jinwon, Lee, Jae-Bum
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Meteorological Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36157837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13143-022-00293-2
_version_ 1784791770596376576
author Ho, Chang-Hoi
Park, Ingyu
Kim, Jinwon
Lee, Jae-Bum
author_facet Ho, Chang-Hoi
Park, Ingyu
Kim, Jinwon
Lee, Jae-Bum
author_sort Ho, Chang-Hoi
collection PubMed
description The National Institute of Environmental Research, under the Ministry of Environment of Korea, provides two-day forecasts, through AirKorea, of the concentration of particulate matter with diameters of ≤ 2.5 μm (PM(2.5)) in terms of four grades (low, moderate, high, and very high) over 19 districts nationwide. Particulate grades are subjectively designated by human forecasters based on forecast results from the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) and artificial intelligence (AI) models in conjunction with weather patterns. This study evaluates forecasts from the long short-term memory (LSTM) algorithm relative to those from CMAQ-solely and AirKorea using observations from 2019. The skills of the one-day PM(2.5) forecasts over the 19 districts were 39–70% for CMAQ, 72–79% for LSTM, and 73–80% for AirKorea; the AI forecasts showed comparable skills to the human forecasters at AirKorea. The one-day forecast skill levels of high and very high PM(2.5) pollution grades are 31–98%, 31–74%, and 39–81% for the CMAQ-solely, the LSTM, and the AirKorea forecasts, respectively. Despite good skills for forecasting the high and very high events, CMAQ-solely forecasts also generate substantially higher false alarm rates (up to 86%) than the LSTM and AirKorea forecasts (up to 58%). Hence, applying only the LSTM model to the CMAQ forecasts can yield reasonable forecast skill levels comparable to the operational AirKorea forecasts that elaborately combine the CMAQ model, AI models, and human forecasters. The present results suggest that applications of appropriate AI models can greatly enhance PM(2.5) forecast skills for Korea in a more objective way. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13143-022-00293-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9483905
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Meteorological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94839052022-09-19 PM(2.5) Forecast in Korea using the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Model Ho, Chang-Hoi Park, Ingyu Kim, Jinwon Lee, Jae-Bum Asia Pac J Atmos Sci Original Article The National Institute of Environmental Research, under the Ministry of Environment of Korea, provides two-day forecasts, through AirKorea, of the concentration of particulate matter with diameters of ≤ 2.5 μm (PM(2.5)) in terms of four grades (low, moderate, high, and very high) over 19 districts nationwide. Particulate grades are subjectively designated by human forecasters based on forecast results from the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) and artificial intelligence (AI) models in conjunction with weather patterns. This study evaluates forecasts from the long short-term memory (LSTM) algorithm relative to those from CMAQ-solely and AirKorea using observations from 2019. The skills of the one-day PM(2.5) forecasts over the 19 districts were 39–70% for CMAQ, 72–79% for LSTM, and 73–80% for AirKorea; the AI forecasts showed comparable skills to the human forecasters at AirKorea. The one-day forecast skill levels of high and very high PM(2.5) pollution grades are 31–98%, 31–74%, and 39–81% for the CMAQ-solely, the LSTM, and the AirKorea forecasts, respectively. Despite good skills for forecasting the high and very high events, CMAQ-solely forecasts also generate substantially higher false alarm rates (up to 86%) than the LSTM and AirKorea forecasts (up to 58%). Hence, applying only the LSTM model to the CMAQ forecasts can yield reasonable forecast skill levels comparable to the operational AirKorea forecasts that elaborately combine the CMAQ model, AI models, and human forecasters. The present results suggest that applications of appropriate AI models can greatly enhance PM(2.5) forecast skills for Korea in a more objective way. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13143-022-00293-2. Korean Meteorological Society 2022-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9483905/ /pubmed/36157837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13143-022-00293-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Ho, Chang-Hoi
Park, Ingyu
Kim, Jinwon
Lee, Jae-Bum
PM(2.5) Forecast in Korea using the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Model
title PM(2.5) Forecast in Korea using the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Model
title_full PM(2.5) Forecast in Korea using the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Model
title_fullStr PM(2.5) Forecast in Korea using the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Model
title_full_unstemmed PM(2.5) Forecast in Korea using the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Model
title_short PM(2.5) Forecast in Korea using the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Model
title_sort pm(2.5) forecast in korea using the long short-term memory (lstm) model
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36157837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13143-022-00293-2
work_keys_str_mv AT hochanghoi pm25forecastinkoreausingthelongshorttermmemorylstmmodel
AT parkingyu pm25forecastinkoreausingthelongshorttermmemorylstmmodel
AT kimjinwon pm25forecastinkoreausingthelongshorttermmemorylstmmodel
AT leejaebum pm25forecastinkoreausingthelongshorttermmemorylstmmodel