Cargando…

Impact of resection margin status and revision transoral laser microsurgery in early glottic cancer: analysis of organ preservation and local disease control on a cohort of 153 patients

INTRODUCTION: Transoral laser microsurgery represents the treatment of choice for early glottic cancer. Its use and effectiveness are mainly related to laryngeal exposure and deep extension of tumor. Histopathologic assessment of surgical margin presents a main issue about transoral laser microsurge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saraniti, Carmelo, Montana, Francesca, Chianetta, Enzo, Greco, Giuseppe, Verro, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33272837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.09.008
_version_ 1784791775746981888
author Saraniti, Carmelo
Montana, Francesca
Chianetta, Enzo
Greco, Giuseppe
Verro, Barbara
author_facet Saraniti, Carmelo
Montana, Francesca
Chianetta, Enzo
Greco, Giuseppe
Verro, Barbara
author_sort Saraniti, Carmelo
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Transoral laser microsurgery represents the treatment of choice for early glottic cancer. Its use and effectiveness are mainly related to laryngeal exposure and deep extension of tumor. Histopathologic assessment of surgical margin presents a main issue about transoral laser microsurgery and complete oncological excision. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to analyze the impact of revision surgery on organ preservation and local disease control in patients with early glottic cancer treated by transoral laser microsurgery. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study on a cohort of 153 patients with early glottic cancer (Tis, T1, T2) treated by transoral laser microsurgery. Resection margins were classified as follows: “free” if macroscopic margin-tumor distance was at least 2 mm, as “close” if it was less than 2 mm and “positive” if the margin was involved by carcinoma. Patients were divided into two groups: patients with free resection margins (Group A) and patients with positive, close or not-evaluable resection margins (Group B). Group A (36) underwent periodic followup. Group B (117) underwent a second look laser CO(2) 2 months after surgery. Fifteen patients of Group A with suspected persistence of carcinoma during followup underwent a second laser resection after a time interval of 4–8 months after first surgery. Overall survival, disease-free survival, disease-specific survival, ultimate local control with laser alone and organ preservation rates were estimated. RESULTS: Five-year overall survival rate and 5-year disease-specific survival were 100% in both groups. The five-year laryngeal preservation rate was 100% in Group A and 95.2% in Group B. Five-year disease-free survival was 92.15% and 5-year ultimate local control with laser alone in 92.15% of patients. CONCLUSION: This study has demonstrated that revision Transoral Laser Microsurgery is able to confirm the oncological radicality in most cases, even in the case of positive, close or non-evaluable margins. Considering our results, according to our experience, the second look with CO(2) laser is a therapeutic strategy to consider, even in the case of close or non-evaluable as well as positive margins.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9483927
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94839272022-09-20 Impact of resection margin status and revision transoral laser microsurgery in early glottic cancer: analysis of organ preservation and local disease control on a cohort of 153 patients Saraniti, Carmelo Montana, Francesca Chianetta, Enzo Greco, Giuseppe Verro, Barbara Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Transoral laser microsurgery represents the treatment of choice for early glottic cancer. Its use and effectiveness are mainly related to laryngeal exposure and deep extension of tumor. Histopathologic assessment of surgical margin presents a main issue about transoral laser microsurgery and complete oncological excision. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to analyze the impact of revision surgery on organ preservation and local disease control in patients with early glottic cancer treated by transoral laser microsurgery. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study on a cohort of 153 patients with early glottic cancer (Tis, T1, T2) treated by transoral laser microsurgery. Resection margins were classified as follows: “free” if macroscopic margin-tumor distance was at least 2 mm, as “close” if it was less than 2 mm and “positive” if the margin was involved by carcinoma. Patients were divided into two groups: patients with free resection margins (Group A) and patients with positive, close or not-evaluable resection margins (Group B). Group A (36) underwent periodic followup. Group B (117) underwent a second look laser CO(2) 2 months after surgery. Fifteen patients of Group A with suspected persistence of carcinoma during followup underwent a second laser resection after a time interval of 4–8 months after first surgery. Overall survival, disease-free survival, disease-specific survival, ultimate local control with laser alone and organ preservation rates were estimated. RESULTS: Five-year overall survival rate and 5-year disease-specific survival were 100% in both groups. The five-year laryngeal preservation rate was 100% in Group A and 95.2% in Group B. Five-year disease-free survival was 92.15% and 5-year ultimate local control with laser alone in 92.15% of patients. CONCLUSION: This study has demonstrated that revision Transoral Laser Microsurgery is able to confirm the oncological radicality in most cases, even in the case of positive, close or non-evaluable margins. Considering our results, according to our experience, the second look with CO(2) laser is a therapeutic strategy to consider, even in the case of close or non-evaluable as well as positive margins. Elsevier 2020-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9483927/ /pubmed/33272837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.09.008 Text en © 2020 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Saraniti, Carmelo
Montana, Francesca
Chianetta, Enzo
Greco, Giuseppe
Verro, Barbara
Impact of resection margin status and revision transoral laser microsurgery in early glottic cancer: analysis of organ preservation and local disease control on a cohort of 153 patients
title Impact of resection margin status and revision transoral laser microsurgery in early glottic cancer: analysis of organ preservation and local disease control on a cohort of 153 patients
title_full Impact of resection margin status and revision transoral laser microsurgery in early glottic cancer: analysis of organ preservation and local disease control on a cohort of 153 patients
title_fullStr Impact of resection margin status and revision transoral laser microsurgery in early glottic cancer: analysis of organ preservation and local disease control on a cohort of 153 patients
title_full_unstemmed Impact of resection margin status and revision transoral laser microsurgery in early glottic cancer: analysis of organ preservation and local disease control on a cohort of 153 patients
title_short Impact of resection margin status and revision transoral laser microsurgery in early glottic cancer: analysis of organ preservation and local disease control on a cohort of 153 patients
title_sort impact of resection margin status and revision transoral laser microsurgery in early glottic cancer: analysis of organ preservation and local disease control on a cohort of 153 patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33272837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.09.008
work_keys_str_mv AT saraniticarmelo impactofresectionmarginstatusandrevisiontransorallasermicrosurgeryinearlyglotticcanceranalysisoforganpreservationandlocaldiseasecontrolonacohortof153patients
AT montanafrancesca impactofresectionmarginstatusandrevisiontransorallasermicrosurgeryinearlyglotticcanceranalysisoforganpreservationandlocaldiseasecontrolonacohortof153patients
AT chianettaenzo impactofresectionmarginstatusandrevisiontransorallasermicrosurgeryinearlyglotticcanceranalysisoforganpreservationandlocaldiseasecontrolonacohortof153patients
AT grecogiuseppe impactofresectionmarginstatusandrevisiontransorallasermicrosurgeryinearlyglotticcanceranalysisoforganpreservationandlocaldiseasecontrolonacohortof153patients
AT verrobarbara impactofresectionmarginstatusandrevisiontransorallasermicrosurgeryinearlyglotticcanceranalysisoforganpreservationandlocaldiseasecontrolonacohortof153patients