Cargando…

Development and validation of the dizziness symptoms questionnaire in Thai-outpatients

INTRODUCTION: “Dizziness” is a common complaint in clinical practice that can occur with anyone. However, since the symptom is caused by a wide range of disorders, a general clinician usually faces some difficulty to detect the cause. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to formulate and validate a simple in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suvanich, Ravin, Chatchawan, Uraiwan, Jariengprasert, Chanchai, Yimtae, Kwanchanok, Hunsawong, Torkamol, Emasithi, Alongkot
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34092523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.05.007
_version_ 1784791791131688960
author Suvanich, Ravin
Chatchawan, Uraiwan
Jariengprasert, Chanchai
Yimtae, Kwanchanok
Hunsawong, Torkamol
Emasithi, Alongkot
author_facet Suvanich, Ravin
Chatchawan, Uraiwan
Jariengprasert, Chanchai
Yimtae, Kwanchanok
Hunsawong, Torkamol
Emasithi, Alongkot
author_sort Suvanich, Ravin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: “Dizziness” is a common complaint in clinical practice that can occur with anyone. However, since the symptom is caused by a wide range of disorders, a general clinician usually faces some difficulty to detect the cause. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to formulate and validate a simple instrument that can be used to screen and predict the most likely cause of dizziness in Thai outpatients. METHODS: This study was divided into two phases. Phase I included 41 patients diagnosed with common causes of dizziness to determine the algorithm and construct the “structural algorithm questionnaire version 1”. In addition, to test and retest its content validity and reliability until the instrument had an acceptable level of both. Phase II of the study pertained to evaluating its accuracy in clinical trials, 150 patients with dizziness had a face-to-face interview while they were waiting for their medical appointment. RESULTS: The degree of agreement between the algorithm results and clinical diagnoses was within an acceptable level (κ = 0.69). Therefore, this algorithm was used to construct the structural algorithm questionnaire version 1. The content validity of the structural algorithm questionnaire version 1 evaluated by seven experts. The content validity index values of the questionnaire ranged from 0.71 to 1.0. The Cohen’s kappa coefficient (κ) of intra-rater reliability of the structural algorithm questionnaire version 1 was 0.71. In clinical trials, 150 patients with dizziness had a face-to-face interview while they were waiting for their appointment. The overall agreement between their questionnaire responses and final diagnoses by specialists showed a moderate degree of clinical accuracy (κ = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: The structural algorithm questionnaire version 1 had a well-developed design and acceptable quality pertaining to both validity and reliability. It might be used to differentiate the cause of dizziness between vestibular and non-vestibular disorders, especially of outpatients with dizziness symptoms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9483993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94839932022-09-20 Development and validation of the dizziness symptoms questionnaire in Thai-outpatients Suvanich, Ravin Chatchawan, Uraiwan Jariengprasert, Chanchai Yimtae, Kwanchanok Hunsawong, Torkamol Emasithi, Alongkot Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article INTRODUCTION: “Dizziness” is a common complaint in clinical practice that can occur with anyone. However, since the symptom is caused by a wide range of disorders, a general clinician usually faces some difficulty to detect the cause. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to formulate and validate a simple instrument that can be used to screen and predict the most likely cause of dizziness in Thai outpatients. METHODS: This study was divided into two phases. Phase I included 41 patients diagnosed with common causes of dizziness to determine the algorithm and construct the “structural algorithm questionnaire version 1”. In addition, to test and retest its content validity and reliability until the instrument had an acceptable level of both. Phase II of the study pertained to evaluating its accuracy in clinical trials, 150 patients with dizziness had a face-to-face interview while they were waiting for their medical appointment. RESULTS: The degree of agreement between the algorithm results and clinical diagnoses was within an acceptable level (κ = 0.69). Therefore, this algorithm was used to construct the structural algorithm questionnaire version 1. The content validity of the structural algorithm questionnaire version 1 evaluated by seven experts. The content validity index values of the questionnaire ranged from 0.71 to 1.0. The Cohen’s kappa coefficient (κ) of intra-rater reliability of the structural algorithm questionnaire version 1 was 0.71. In clinical trials, 150 patients with dizziness had a face-to-face interview while they were waiting for their appointment. The overall agreement between their questionnaire responses and final diagnoses by specialists showed a moderate degree of clinical accuracy (κ = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: The structural algorithm questionnaire version 1 had a well-developed design and acceptable quality pertaining to both validity and reliability. It might be used to differentiate the cause of dizziness between vestibular and non-vestibular disorders, especially of outpatients with dizziness symptoms. Elsevier 2021-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9483993/ /pubmed/34092523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.05.007 Text en © 2021 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Suvanich, Ravin
Chatchawan, Uraiwan
Jariengprasert, Chanchai
Yimtae, Kwanchanok
Hunsawong, Torkamol
Emasithi, Alongkot
Development and validation of the dizziness symptoms questionnaire in Thai-outpatients
title Development and validation of the dizziness symptoms questionnaire in Thai-outpatients
title_full Development and validation of the dizziness symptoms questionnaire in Thai-outpatients
title_fullStr Development and validation of the dizziness symptoms questionnaire in Thai-outpatients
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of the dizziness symptoms questionnaire in Thai-outpatients
title_short Development and validation of the dizziness symptoms questionnaire in Thai-outpatients
title_sort development and validation of the dizziness symptoms questionnaire in thai-outpatients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34092523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.05.007
work_keys_str_mv AT suvanichravin developmentandvalidationofthedizzinesssymptomsquestionnaireinthaioutpatients
AT chatchawanuraiwan developmentandvalidationofthedizzinesssymptomsquestionnaireinthaioutpatients
AT jariengprasertchanchai developmentandvalidationofthedizzinesssymptomsquestionnaireinthaioutpatients
AT yimtaekwanchanok developmentandvalidationofthedizzinesssymptomsquestionnaireinthaioutpatients
AT hunsawongtorkamol developmentandvalidationofthedizzinesssymptomsquestionnaireinthaioutpatients
AT emasithialongkot developmentandvalidationofthedizzinesssymptomsquestionnaireinthaioutpatients