Cargando…

Measurement properties of the HOOS-PS in revision total hip arthroplasty: a validation study on validity, interpretability, and responsiveness in 136 revision hip arthroplasty patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine whether the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical function Short-form (HOOS-PS) is able to appropriately evaluate physical function in revision hip arthroplasty patients, this study assesses psychometric properties of the Dutch HOOS-PS in this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: KORBEE, Sanne, VAN KEMPEN, Robin, VAN WENSEN, Remco, VAN DER STEEN, Marieke, LIU, Wai-Yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medical Journals Sweden, on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9484076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36121126
http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2022.4572
_version_ 1784791806450335744
author KORBEE, Sanne
VAN KEMPEN, Robin
VAN WENSEN, Remco
VAN DER STEEN, Marieke
LIU, Wai-Yan
author_facet KORBEE, Sanne
VAN KEMPEN, Robin
VAN WENSEN, Remco
VAN DER STEEN, Marieke
LIU, Wai-Yan
author_sort KORBEE, Sanne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine whether the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical function Short-form (HOOS-PS) is able to appropriately evaluate physical function in revision hip arthroplasty patients, this study assesses psychometric properties of the Dutch HOOS-PS in this patient population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed psychometric properties of the HOOS-PS following the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) criteria. Content validity, including comprehensibility, comprehensiveness, and relevance of the items, was assessed using cognitive debriefing interviews in hip revision patients (n = 8) and orthopedic surgeons specialized in revision surgery (n = 7). Construct validity, responsiveness, and interpretability (floor/ceiling effects) were assessed in revision hip arthroplasty patients (baseline n = 136, follow-up n = 67). We formulated hypotheses a priori to assess construct validity and responsiveness using the EuroQol 5-Dimensions Health Questionnaire, Numeric Rating scale for pain, and Oxford Hip Score as comparators. All questionnaires were measured at baseline and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: We found insufficient content validity of the HOOS-PS, as relevance and comprehensibility of the items scored < 85% on the COSMIN criteria for revision hip arthroplasty patients. Construct validity was sufficient as all hypotheses were confirmed (≥ 75% COSMIN criteria). Interpretability was sufficient (< 15% COSMIN criteria) and responsiveness was insufficient (< 75% COSMIN criteria). INTERPRETATION: The Dutch HOOS-PS is not able to sufficiently evaluate physical function in revision hip arthroplasty patients. Minor changes in the items are needed for the HOOS-PS to become sufficiently content valid, because the HOOS-PS lacks relevant items and comprehensiveness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9484076
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Medical Journals Sweden, on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94840762022-09-26 Measurement properties of the HOOS-PS in revision total hip arthroplasty: a validation study on validity, interpretability, and responsiveness in 136 revision hip arthroplasty patients KORBEE, Sanne VAN KEMPEN, Robin VAN WENSEN, Remco VAN DER STEEN, Marieke LIU, Wai-Yan Acta Orthop Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine whether the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical function Short-form (HOOS-PS) is able to appropriately evaluate physical function in revision hip arthroplasty patients, this study assesses psychometric properties of the Dutch HOOS-PS in this patient population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed psychometric properties of the HOOS-PS following the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) criteria. Content validity, including comprehensibility, comprehensiveness, and relevance of the items, was assessed using cognitive debriefing interviews in hip revision patients (n = 8) and orthopedic surgeons specialized in revision surgery (n = 7). Construct validity, responsiveness, and interpretability (floor/ceiling effects) were assessed in revision hip arthroplasty patients (baseline n = 136, follow-up n = 67). We formulated hypotheses a priori to assess construct validity and responsiveness using the EuroQol 5-Dimensions Health Questionnaire, Numeric Rating scale for pain, and Oxford Hip Score as comparators. All questionnaires were measured at baseline and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: We found insufficient content validity of the HOOS-PS, as relevance and comprehensibility of the items scored < 85% on the COSMIN criteria for revision hip arthroplasty patients. Construct validity was sufficient as all hypotheses were confirmed (≥ 75% COSMIN criteria). Interpretability was sufficient (< 15% COSMIN criteria) and responsiveness was insufficient (< 75% COSMIN criteria). INTERPRETATION: The Dutch HOOS-PS is not able to sufficiently evaluate physical function in revision hip arthroplasty patients. Minor changes in the items are needed for the HOOS-PS to become sufficiently content valid, because the HOOS-PS lacks relevant items and comprehensiveness. Medical Journals Sweden, on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation 2022-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9484076/ /pubmed/36121126 http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2022.4572 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
spellingShingle Article
KORBEE, Sanne
VAN KEMPEN, Robin
VAN WENSEN, Remco
VAN DER STEEN, Marieke
LIU, Wai-Yan
Measurement properties of the HOOS-PS in revision total hip arthroplasty: a validation study on validity, interpretability, and responsiveness in 136 revision hip arthroplasty patients
title Measurement properties of the HOOS-PS in revision total hip arthroplasty: a validation study on validity, interpretability, and responsiveness in 136 revision hip arthroplasty patients
title_full Measurement properties of the HOOS-PS in revision total hip arthroplasty: a validation study on validity, interpretability, and responsiveness in 136 revision hip arthroplasty patients
title_fullStr Measurement properties of the HOOS-PS in revision total hip arthroplasty: a validation study on validity, interpretability, and responsiveness in 136 revision hip arthroplasty patients
title_full_unstemmed Measurement properties of the HOOS-PS in revision total hip arthroplasty: a validation study on validity, interpretability, and responsiveness in 136 revision hip arthroplasty patients
title_short Measurement properties of the HOOS-PS in revision total hip arthroplasty: a validation study on validity, interpretability, and responsiveness in 136 revision hip arthroplasty patients
title_sort measurement properties of the hoos-ps in revision total hip arthroplasty: a validation study on validity, interpretability, and responsiveness in 136 revision hip arthroplasty patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9484076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36121126
http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2022.4572
work_keys_str_mv AT korbeesanne measurementpropertiesofthehoospsinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyavalidationstudyonvalidityinterpretabilityandresponsivenessin136revisionhiparthroplastypatients
AT vankempenrobin measurementpropertiesofthehoospsinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyavalidationstudyonvalidityinterpretabilityandresponsivenessin136revisionhiparthroplastypatients
AT vanwensenremco measurementpropertiesofthehoospsinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyavalidationstudyonvalidityinterpretabilityandresponsivenessin136revisionhiparthroplastypatients
AT vandersteenmarieke measurementpropertiesofthehoospsinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyavalidationstudyonvalidityinterpretabilityandresponsivenessin136revisionhiparthroplastypatients
AT liuwaiyan measurementpropertiesofthehoospsinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyavalidationstudyonvalidityinterpretabilityandresponsivenessin136revisionhiparthroplastypatients