Cargando…
Measurement properties of the HOOS-PS in revision total hip arthroplasty: a validation study on validity, interpretability, and responsiveness in 136 revision hip arthroplasty patients
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine whether the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical function Short-form (HOOS-PS) is able to appropriately evaluate physical function in revision hip arthroplasty patients, this study assesses psychometric properties of the Dutch HOOS-PS in this...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medical Journals Sweden, on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9484076/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36121126 http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2022.4572 |
_version_ | 1784791806450335744 |
---|---|
author | KORBEE, Sanne VAN KEMPEN, Robin VAN WENSEN, Remco VAN DER STEEN, Marieke LIU, Wai-Yan |
author_facet | KORBEE, Sanne VAN KEMPEN, Robin VAN WENSEN, Remco VAN DER STEEN, Marieke LIU, Wai-Yan |
author_sort | KORBEE, Sanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine whether the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical function Short-form (HOOS-PS) is able to appropriately evaluate physical function in revision hip arthroplasty patients, this study assesses psychometric properties of the Dutch HOOS-PS in this patient population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed psychometric properties of the HOOS-PS following the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) criteria. Content validity, including comprehensibility, comprehensiveness, and relevance of the items, was assessed using cognitive debriefing interviews in hip revision patients (n = 8) and orthopedic surgeons specialized in revision surgery (n = 7). Construct validity, responsiveness, and interpretability (floor/ceiling effects) were assessed in revision hip arthroplasty patients (baseline n = 136, follow-up n = 67). We formulated hypotheses a priori to assess construct validity and responsiveness using the EuroQol 5-Dimensions Health Questionnaire, Numeric Rating scale for pain, and Oxford Hip Score as comparators. All questionnaires were measured at baseline and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: We found insufficient content validity of the HOOS-PS, as relevance and comprehensibility of the items scored < 85% on the COSMIN criteria for revision hip arthroplasty patients. Construct validity was sufficient as all hypotheses were confirmed (≥ 75% COSMIN criteria). Interpretability was sufficient (< 15% COSMIN criteria) and responsiveness was insufficient (< 75% COSMIN criteria). INTERPRETATION: The Dutch HOOS-PS is not able to sufficiently evaluate physical function in revision hip arthroplasty patients. Minor changes in the items are needed for the HOOS-PS to become sufficiently content valid, because the HOOS-PS lacks relevant items and comprehensiveness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9484076 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Medical Journals Sweden, on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94840762022-09-26 Measurement properties of the HOOS-PS in revision total hip arthroplasty: a validation study on validity, interpretability, and responsiveness in 136 revision hip arthroplasty patients KORBEE, Sanne VAN KEMPEN, Robin VAN WENSEN, Remco VAN DER STEEN, Marieke LIU, Wai-Yan Acta Orthop Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine whether the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical function Short-form (HOOS-PS) is able to appropriately evaluate physical function in revision hip arthroplasty patients, this study assesses psychometric properties of the Dutch HOOS-PS in this patient population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed psychometric properties of the HOOS-PS following the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) criteria. Content validity, including comprehensibility, comprehensiveness, and relevance of the items, was assessed using cognitive debriefing interviews in hip revision patients (n = 8) and orthopedic surgeons specialized in revision surgery (n = 7). Construct validity, responsiveness, and interpretability (floor/ceiling effects) were assessed in revision hip arthroplasty patients (baseline n = 136, follow-up n = 67). We formulated hypotheses a priori to assess construct validity and responsiveness using the EuroQol 5-Dimensions Health Questionnaire, Numeric Rating scale for pain, and Oxford Hip Score as comparators. All questionnaires were measured at baseline and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: We found insufficient content validity of the HOOS-PS, as relevance and comprehensibility of the items scored < 85% on the COSMIN criteria for revision hip arthroplasty patients. Construct validity was sufficient as all hypotheses were confirmed (≥ 75% COSMIN criteria). Interpretability was sufficient (< 15% COSMIN criteria) and responsiveness was insufficient (< 75% COSMIN criteria). INTERPRETATION: The Dutch HOOS-PS is not able to sufficiently evaluate physical function in revision hip arthroplasty patients. Minor changes in the items are needed for the HOOS-PS to become sufficiently content valid, because the HOOS-PS lacks relevant items and comprehensiveness. Medical Journals Sweden, on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation 2022-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9484076/ /pubmed/36121126 http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2022.4572 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work. |
spellingShingle | Article KORBEE, Sanne VAN KEMPEN, Robin VAN WENSEN, Remco VAN DER STEEN, Marieke LIU, Wai-Yan Measurement properties of the HOOS-PS in revision total hip arthroplasty: a validation study on validity, interpretability, and responsiveness in 136 revision hip arthroplasty patients |
title | Measurement properties of the HOOS-PS in revision total hip arthroplasty: a validation study on validity, interpretability, and responsiveness in 136 revision hip arthroplasty patients |
title_full | Measurement properties of the HOOS-PS in revision total hip arthroplasty: a validation study on validity, interpretability, and responsiveness in 136 revision hip arthroplasty patients |
title_fullStr | Measurement properties of the HOOS-PS in revision total hip arthroplasty: a validation study on validity, interpretability, and responsiveness in 136 revision hip arthroplasty patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Measurement properties of the HOOS-PS in revision total hip arthroplasty: a validation study on validity, interpretability, and responsiveness in 136 revision hip arthroplasty patients |
title_short | Measurement properties of the HOOS-PS in revision total hip arthroplasty: a validation study on validity, interpretability, and responsiveness in 136 revision hip arthroplasty patients |
title_sort | measurement properties of the hoos-ps in revision total hip arthroplasty: a validation study on validity, interpretability, and responsiveness in 136 revision hip arthroplasty patients |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9484076/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36121126 http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2022.4572 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT korbeesanne measurementpropertiesofthehoospsinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyavalidationstudyonvalidityinterpretabilityandresponsivenessin136revisionhiparthroplastypatients AT vankempenrobin measurementpropertiesofthehoospsinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyavalidationstudyonvalidityinterpretabilityandresponsivenessin136revisionhiparthroplastypatients AT vanwensenremco measurementpropertiesofthehoospsinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyavalidationstudyonvalidityinterpretabilityandresponsivenessin136revisionhiparthroplastypatients AT vandersteenmarieke measurementpropertiesofthehoospsinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyavalidationstudyonvalidityinterpretabilityandresponsivenessin136revisionhiparthroplastypatients AT liuwaiyan measurementpropertiesofthehoospsinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyavalidationstudyonvalidityinterpretabilityandresponsivenessin136revisionhiparthroplastypatients |