Cargando…

Evaluation of the antibacterial activity of Lactobacilli probiotics supernatants against Enterococcus faecalis (in-vitro study)

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing demand to find a potent antibacterial agent against endodontic pathogens with the least toxic effect. The study aimed to evaluate the antibacterial activity of Lactobacilli probiotics on Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) in comparison to calcium hydroxide paste....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shaaban, Shymaa, Hamad, Gamal M., Genena, Salma, Meheissen, Marwa A., Moussa, Sybel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9484162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36117178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02434-5
_version_ 1784791826417319936
author Shaaban, Shymaa
Hamad, Gamal M.
Genena, Salma
Meheissen, Marwa A.
Moussa, Sybel
author_facet Shaaban, Shymaa
Hamad, Gamal M.
Genena, Salma
Meheissen, Marwa A.
Moussa, Sybel
author_sort Shaaban, Shymaa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is an increasing demand to find a potent antibacterial agent against endodontic pathogens with the least toxic effect. The study aimed to evaluate the antibacterial activity of Lactobacilli probiotics on Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) in comparison to calcium hydroxide paste. METHODS: The study involved two stages; (stage one): determination of the antibacterial properties of three strains of Lactobacilli probiotics supernatants (PS); Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and a cocktail mix of the three supernatants against E. faecalis using agar well diffusion method in both solution and gel phase. The formed zones of inhibition (ZOI) were measured in millimeters (mm) and compared to each other. PS solution and gel of the largest ZOI were further compared with calcium hydroxide paste (35% Ultra Cal XS Ca(OH)(2)) This was followed by (stage two): assessment of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the PS that showed the largest ZOI against E. faecalis by agar well diffusion assay for both PS solution and gel. RESULTS: All supernatants showed growth inhibition against E. faecalis, and the cocktail mix showed the largest ZOI. However, no significant difference was found between the supernatants in both the solution and gel phases (p > 0.05). Ca(OH)(2) showed a significantly lower effect than both the cocktail mix solution and gel (p < 0.05). The MIC of the cocktail mix solution and gel against E. faecalis was 50 mg/ml. (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: PS has an antibacterial effect on E. faecalis and was more effective than Ca(OH)(2.) Lactobacilli probiotics could be a promising antibacterial agent used as an irrigant or an intracanal medication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9484162
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94841622022-09-20 Evaluation of the antibacterial activity of Lactobacilli probiotics supernatants against Enterococcus faecalis (in-vitro study) Shaaban, Shymaa Hamad, Gamal M. Genena, Salma Meheissen, Marwa A. Moussa, Sybel BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: There is an increasing demand to find a potent antibacterial agent against endodontic pathogens with the least toxic effect. The study aimed to evaluate the antibacterial activity of Lactobacilli probiotics on Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) in comparison to calcium hydroxide paste. METHODS: The study involved two stages; (stage one): determination of the antibacterial properties of three strains of Lactobacilli probiotics supernatants (PS); Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and a cocktail mix of the three supernatants against E. faecalis using agar well diffusion method in both solution and gel phase. The formed zones of inhibition (ZOI) were measured in millimeters (mm) and compared to each other. PS solution and gel of the largest ZOI were further compared with calcium hydroxide paste (35% Ultra Cal XS Ca(OH)(2)) This was followed by (stage two): assessment of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the PS that showed the largest ZOI against E. faecalis by agar well diffusion assay for both PS solution and gel. RESULTS: All supernatants showed growth inhibition against E. faecalis, and the cocktail mix showed the largest ZOI. However, no significant difference was found between the supernatants in both the solution and gel phases (p > 0.05). Ca(OH)(2) showed a significantly lower effect than both the cocktail mix solution and gel (p < 0.05). The MIC of the cocktail mix solution and gel against E. faecalis was 50 mg/ml. (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: PS has an antibacterial effect on E. faecalis and was more effective than Ca(OH)(2.) Lactobacilli probiotics could be a promising antibacterial agent used as an irrigant or an intracanal medication. BioMed Central 2022-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9484162/ /pubmed/36117178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02434-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Shaaban, Shymaa
Hamad, Gamal M.
Genena, Salma
Meheissen, Marwa A.
Moussa, Sybel
Evaluation of the antibacterial activity of Lactobacilli probiotics supernatants against Enterococcus faecalis (in-vitro study)
title Evaluation of the antibacterial activity of Lactobacilli probiotics supernatants against Enterococcus faecalis (in-vitro study)
title_full Evaluation of the antibacterial activity of Lactobacilli probiotics supernatants against Enterococcus faecalis (in-vitro study)
title_fullStr Evaluation of the antibacterial activity of Lactobacilli probiotics supernatants against Enterococcus faecalis (in-vitro study)
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the antibacterial activity of Lactobacilli probiotics supernatants against Enterococcus faecalis (in-vitro study)
title_short Evaluation of the antibacterial activity of Lactobacilli probiotics supernatants against Enterococcus faecalis (in-vitro study)
title_sort evaluation of the antibacterial activity of lactobacilli probiotics supernatants against enterococcus faecalis (in-vitro study)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9484162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36117178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02434-5
work_keys_str_mv AT shaabanshymaa evaluationoftheantibacterialactivityoflactobacilliprobioticssupernatantsagainstenterococcusfaecalisinvitrostudy
AT hamadgamalm evaluationoftheantibacterialactivityoflactobacilliprobioticssupernatantsagainstenterococcusfaecalisinvitrostudy
AT genenasalma evaluationoftheantibacterialactivityoflactobacilliprobioticssupernatantsagainstenterococcusfaecalisinvitrostudy
AT meheissenmarwaa evaluationoftheantibacterialactivityoflactobacilliprobioticssupernatantsagainstenterococcusfaecalisinvitrostudy
AT moussasybel evaluationoftheantibacterialactivityoflactobacilliprobioticssupernatantsagainstenterococcusfaecalisinvitrostudy