Cargando…

Comparison of contrast-to-noise ratios of different detection methods in ultrasound optical tomography

Ultrasound optical tomography (UOT) is a hybrid imaging modality based on interaction between ultrasound and light, with a potential to extend optical imaging capabilities in biological tissues to depths of several centimeters. Several methods have been developed to detect the UOT signal. To better...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bengtsson, Alexander, Hill, David, Shortiss, Kevin, Rippe, Lars, Kröll, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Optica Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9484419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36187237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/BOE.457075
_version_ 1784791877341413376
author Bengtsson, Alexander
Hill, David
Shortiss, Kevin
Rippe, Lars
Kröll, Stefan
author_facet Bengtsson, Alexander
Hill, David
Shortiss, Kevin
Rippe, Lars
Kröll, Stefan
author_sort Bengtsson, Alexander
collection PubMed
description Ultrasound optical tomography (UOT) is a hybrid imaging modality based on interaction between ultrasound and light, with a potential to extend optical imaging capabilities in biological tissues to depths of several centimeters. Several methods have been developed to detect the UOT signal. To better understand their potential for deep tissue imaging, we present a theoretical contrast-to-noise comparison between the spectral hole burning, single-shot off-axis holography, speckle contrast, and photorefractive detection methods for UOT. Our results indicate that spectral hole burning filters have the potential to reach the largest imaging depths. We find that digital off-axis holography and photorefractive detection can have good contrast-to-noise ratio at significant depths. The speckle contrast method has a smaller penetration depth comparatively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9484419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Optica Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94844192022-09-29 Comparison of contrast-to-noise ratios of different detection methods in ultrasound optical tomography Bengtsson, Alexander Hill, David Shortiss, Kevin Rippe, Lars Kröll, Stefan Biomed Opt Express Article Ultrasound optical tomography (UOT) is a hybrid imaging modality based on interaction between ultrasound and light, with a potential to extend optical imaging capabilities in biological tissues to depths of several centimeters. Several methods have been developed to detect the UOT signal. To better understand their potential for deep tissue imaging, we present a theoretical contrast-to-noise comparison between the spectral hole burning, single-shot off-axis holography, speckle contrast, and photorefractive detection methods for UOT. Our results indicate that spectral hole burning filters have the potential to reach the largest imaging depths. We find that digital off-axis holography and photorefractive detection can have good contrast-to-noise ratio at significant depths. The speckle contrast method has a smaller penetration depth comparatively. Optica Publishing Group 2022-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9484419/ /pubmed/36187237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/BOE.457075 Text en Published by Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Bengtsson, Alexander
Hill, David
Shortiss, Kevin
Rippe, Lars
Kröll, Stefan
Comparison of contrast-to-noise ratios of different detection methods in ultrasound optical tomography
title Comparison of contrast-to-noise ratios of different detection methods in ultrasound optical tomography
title_full Comparison of contrast-to-noise ratios of different detection methods in ultrasound optical tomography
title_fullStr Comparison of contrast-to-noise ratios of different detection methods in ultrasound optical tomography
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of contrast-to-noise ratios of different detection methods in ultrasound optical tomography
title_short Comparison of contrast-to-noise ratios of different detection methods in ultrasound optical tomography
title_sort comparison of contrast-to-noise ratios of different detection methods in ultrasound optical tomography
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9484419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36187237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/BOE.457075
work_keys_str_mv AT bengtssonalexander comparisonofcontrasttonoiseratiosofdifferentdetectionmethodsinultrasoundopticaltomography
AT hilldavid comparisonofcontrasttonoiseratiosofdifferentdetectionmethodsinultrasoundopticaltomography
AT shortisskevin comparisonofcontrasttonoiseratiosofdifferentdetectionmethodsinultrasoundopticaltomography
AT rippelars comparisonofcontrasttonoiseratiosofdifferentdetectionmethodsinultrasoundopticaltomography
AT krollstefan comparisonofcontrasttonoiseratiosofdifferentdetectionmethodsinultrasoundopticaltomography