Cargando…

Return-to-Work Following Occupational Rehabilitation for Long COVID: Descriptive Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence suggests that worldwide, between 30% and 50% of those who are infected with COVID-19 experience long COVID (LC) symptoms. These symptoms create challenges with return-to-work (RTW) in a high proportion of individuals with LC. To tailor rehabilitation programs to LC sequ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brehon, Katelyn, Niemeläinen, Riikka, Hall, Mark, Bostick, Geoff P, Brown, Cary A, Wieler, Marguerite, Gross, Douglas P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9484483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36094442
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/39883
_version_ 1784791885082001408
author Brehon, Katelyn
Niemeläinen, Riikka
Hall, Mark
Bostick, Geoff P
Brown, Cary A
Wieler, Marguerite
Gross, Douglas P
author_facet Brehon, Katelyn
Niemeläinen, Riikka
Hall, Mark
Bostick, Geoff P
Brown, Cary A
Wieler, Marguerite
Gross, Douglas P
author_sort Brehon, Katelyn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence suggests that worldwide, between 30% and 50% of those who are infected with COVID-19 experience long COVID (LC) symptoms. These symptoms create challenges with return-to-work (RTW) in a high proportion of individuals with LC. To tailor rehabilitation programs to LC sequelae and help improve RTW outcomes, more research on LC rehabilitation program outcomes is needed. OBJECTIVE: This study describes the characteristics and outcomes of workers who participated in an LC occupational rehabilitation program. METHODS: A cohort study was conducted. Descriptive variables included demographic and occupational factors as well as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs, ie, the Fatigue Severity Scale [FSS], the Post-COVID Functional Scale [PCFS], the 36-item Short Form Health Survey [SF-36], the Pain Disability Index [PDI], the pain Visual Analogue Scale [VAS], the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9], the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire [GAD-7], and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders Fifth Edition [DSM-5] posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD] checklist [PCL-5]). The main outcome variable was the RTW status at discharge. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Logistic regression examined predictors of RTW. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 81 workers. Most workers were female (n=52, 64%) and from health-related occupations (n=43, 53%). Only 43 (53%) individuals returned to work at program discharge, with 40 (93%) of these returning to modified duties. Although there were statistically significant improvements on the pain VAS (mean 11.1, SD 25.6, t(31)=2.5, P=.02), the PDI (mean 9.4, SD 12.5, t(32)=4.3, P<.001), the FSS (mean 3.9, SD 8.7, t(38)=2.8, P=.01), the SF-36 PCS (mean 4.8, SD 8.7, t(38)=–3.5, P=.001), the PHQ-9 (mean 3.7, SD 4.0, t(31)=5.2, P<.001), and the GAD-7 (mean 1.8, SD 4.4, t(22)=1.8, P=.03), there were no significant improvements in the PCFS, the overall mental component score (MCS) of the SF-36, or on the PCL-5. The availability of modified duties (odds ratio [OR] 3.38, 95% CI 1.26-9.10) and shorter time between infection and admission for rehabilitation (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.99-1.00) predicted RTW even when controlling for age and gender. CONCLUSIONS: Workers undergoing LC rehabilitation reported significant but modest improvements on a variety of PROMs, but only 43 (53%) returned to work. Outcomes would likely improve with increased availability of modified duties and timelier rehabilitation. Additional research is needed, including larger observational cohorts as well as randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effectiveness of LC rehabilitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9484483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94844832022-09-20 Return-to-Work Following Occupational Rehabilitation for Long COVID: Descriptive Cohort Study Brehon, Katelyn Niemeläinen, Riikka Hall, Mark Bostick, Geoff P Brown, Cary A Wieler, Marguerite Gross, Douglas P JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol Original Paper BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence suggests that worldwide, between 30% and 50% of those who are infected with COVID-19 experience long COVID (LC) symptoms. These symptoms create challenges with return-to-work (RTW) in a high proportion of individuals with LC. To tailor rehabilitation programs to LC sequelae and help improve RTW outcomes, more research on LC rehabilitation program outcomes is needed. OBJECTIVE: This study describes the characteristics and outcomes of workers who participated in an LC occupational rehabilitation program. METHODS: A cohort study was conducted. Descriptive variables included demographic and occupational factors as well as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs, ie, the Fatigue Severity Scale [FSS], the Post-COVID Functional Scale [PCFS], the 36-item Short Form Health Survey [SF-36], the Pain Disability Index [PDI], the pain Visual Analogue Scale [VAS], the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9], the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire [GAD-7], and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders Fifth Edition [DSM-5] posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD] checklist [PCL-5]). The main outcome variable was the RTW status at discharge. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Logistic regression examined predictors of RTW. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 81 workers. Most workers were female (n=52, 64%) and from health-related occupations (n=43, 53%). Only 43 (53%) individuals returned to work at program discharge, with 40 (93%) of these returning to modified duties. Although there were statistically significant improvements on the pain VAS (mean 11.1, SD 25.6, t(31)=2.5, P=.02), the PDI (mean 9.4, SD 12.5, t(32)=4.3, P<.001), the FSS (mean 3.9, SD 8.7, t(38)=2.8, P=.01), the SF-36 PCS (mean 4.8, SD 8.7, t(38)=–3.5, P=.001), the PHQ-9 (mean 3.7, SD 4.0, t(31)=5.2, P<.001), and the GAD-7 (mean 1.8, SD 4.4, t(22)=1.8, P=.03), there were no significant improvements in the PCFS, the overall mental component score (MCS) of the SF-36, or on the PCL-5. The availability of modified duties (odds ratio [OR] 3.38, 95% CI 1.26-9.10) and shorter time between infection and admission for rehabilitation (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.99-1.00) predicted RTW even when controlling for age and gender. CONCLUSIONS: Workers undergoing LC rehabilitation reported significant but modest improvements on a variety of PROMs, but only 43 (53%) returned to work. Outcomes would likely improve with increased availability of modified duties and timelier rehabilitation. Additional research is needed, including larger observational cohorts as well as randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effectiveness of LC rehabilitation. JMIR Publications 2022-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9484483/ /pubmed/36094442 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/39883 Text en ©Katelyn Brehon, Riikka Niemeläinen, Mark Hall, Geoff P Bostick, Cary A Brown, Marguerite Wieler, Douglas P Gross. Originally published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology (https://rehab.jmir.org), 14.09.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://rehab.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Brehon, Katelyn
Niemeläinen, Riikka
Hall, Mark
Bostick, Geoff P
Brown, Cary A
Wieler, Marguerite
Gross, Douglas P
Return-to-Work Following Occupational Rehabilitation for Long COVID: Descriptive Cohort Study
title Return-to-Work Following Occupational Rehabilitation for Long COVID: Descriptive Cohort Study
title_full Return-to-Work Following Occupational Rehabilitation for Long COVID: Descriptive Cohort Study
title_fullStr Return-to-Work Following Occupational Rehabilitation for Long COVID: Descriptive Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Return-to-Work Following Occupational Rehabilitation for Long COVID: Descriptive Cohort Study
title_short Return-to-Work Following Occupational Rehabilitation for Long COVID: Descriptive Cohort Study
title_sort return-to-work following occupational rehabilitation for long covid: descriptive cohort study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9484483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36094442
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/39883
work_keys_str_mv AT brehonkatelyn returntoworkfollowingoccupationalrehabilitationforlongcoviddescriptivecohortstudy
AT niemelainenriikka returntoworkfollowingoccupationalrehabilitationforlongcoviddescriptivecohortstudy
AT hallmark returntoworkfollowingoccupationalrehabilitationforlongcoviddescriptivecohortstudy
AT bostickgeoffp returntoworkfollowingoccupationalrehabilitationforlongcoviddescriptivecohortstudy
AT browncarya returntoworkfollowingoccupationalrehabilitationforlongcoviddescriptivecohortstudy
AT wielermarguerite returntoworkfollowingoccupationalrehabilitationforlongcoviddescriptivecohortstudy
AT grossdouglasp returntoworkfollowingoccupationalrehabilitationforlongcoviddescriptivecohortstudy