Cargando…

The role of routine groin ultrasonography in the management of inguinal hernia

BACKGROUND: Groin ultrasonography (US) has been used as an adjunct to inguinal hernia diagnosis, but there is limited evidence as to whether its use affects surgical decision-making. The primary aim of this study was to examine whether groin US affects surgical management of inguinal hernia; the sec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marcil, Gabriel, Schendel, Jennifer, Tong, Ryan, Mitchell, Philip, Church, Neal, Reso, Artan, Ball, Chad, Gill, Richdeep, Debru, Estifanos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: CMA Impact Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9484611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36104044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.003421
_version_ 1784791909487607808
author Marcil, Gabriel
Schendel, Jennifer
Tong, Ryan
Mitchell, Philip
Church, Neal
Reso, Artan
Ball, Chad
Gill, Richdeep
Debru, Estifanos
author_facet Marcil, Gabriel
Schendel, Jennifer
Tong, Ryan
Mitchell, Philip
Church, Neal
Reso, Artan
Ball, Chad
Gill, Richdeep
Debru, Estifanos
author_sort Marcil, Gabriel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Groin ultrasonography (US) has been used as an adjunct to inguinal hernia diagnosis, but there is limited evidence as to whether its use affects surgical decision-making. The primary aim of this study was to examine whether groin US affects surgical management of inguinal hernia; the secondary goal was to estimate the frequency of groin US ordered before surgical consultation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of 400 consecutive patients aged older than 18 years referred to 1 of 4 general surgeons in Calgary, Alberta, for inguinal hernia between January 2014 and January 2015. Bilateral groin examinations were entered as separate entries into the database. Outcomes assessed included the frequency of groin US examinations performed within 1 year before the general surgery consultation, presence of inguinal hernia on clinical examination (CE), presence of inguinal hernia on groin US, and whether the hernia proceeded to herniorrhaphy. RESULTS: A total of 476 groins in the 400 patients (354 [88.5%] male; mean age 53.5 yr [standard deviation 15.2 yr]) were evaluated for a hernia during the study period. Groin US was performed before general surgery consultation in 336 cases (70.6%). Overall, 364 (76.5%) of the hernias were clinically palpable; of the 364, 220 (60.4%) had preconsultation US, even in the presence of a positive CE finding. Of the 112 groins that did not have a clinically palpable hernia, 103 (92.0%) underwent preconsultation US. Of the 476 groins, 315 (66.2%) underwent inguinal hernia repair: 310 (85.2%) of the 364 with clinically palpable hernias and 5 (4.8%) of the 103 with clinically negative findings but positive groin US findings. Surgical decision-making based on CE findings occurred in 390 cases (81.9%) overall, whereas surgery based on groin US findings alone occurred in 5 of 336 cases (1.5%). CONCLUSION: Routine groin US was frequently performed before general surgery consultation, whether a hernia was detectable on clinical examination or not. Positive groin US results alone infrequently affected whether the patient proceeded to surgery. Clinical examination findings played a larger role in surgical decision-making than groin US results. Eliminating the practice of routine groin US may provide considerable health care cost savings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9484611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher CMA Impact Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94846112022-09-23 The role of routine groin ultrasonography in the management of inguinal hernia Marcil, Gabriel Schendel, Jennifer Tong, Ryan Mitchell, Philip Church, Neal Reso, Artan Ball, Chad Gill, Richdeep Debru, Estifanos Can J Surg Research BACKGROUND: Groin ultrasonography (US) has been used as an adjunct to inguinal hernia diagnosis, but there is limited evidence as to whether its use affects surgical decision-making. The primary aim of this study was to examine whether groin US affects surgical management of inguinal hernia; the secondary goal was to estimate the frequency of groin US ordered before surgical consultation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of 400 consecutive patients aged older than 18 years referred to 1 of 4 general surgeons in Calgary, Alberta, for inguinal hernia between January 2014 and January 2015. Bilateral groin examinations were entered as separate entries into the database. Outcomes assessed included the frequency of groin US examinations performed within 1 year before the general surgery consultation, presence of inguinal hernia on clinical examination (CE), presence of inguinal hernia on groin US, and whether the hernia proceeded to herniorrhaphy. RESULTS: A total of 476 groins in the 400 patients (354 [88.5%] male; mean age 53.5 yr [standard deviation 15.2 yr]) were evaluated for a hernia during the study period. Groin US was performed before general surgery consultation in 336 cases (70.6%). Overall, 364 (76.5%) of the hernias were clinically palpable; of the 364, 220 (60.4%) had preconsultation US, even in the presence of a positive CE finding. Of the 112 groins that did not have a clinically palpable hernia, 103 (92.0%) underwent preconsultation US. Of the 476 groins, 315 (66.2%) underwent inguinal hernia repair: 310 (85.2%) of the 364 with clinically palpable hernias and 5 (4.8%) of the 103 with clinically negative findings but positive groin US findings. Surgical decision-making based on CE findings occurred in 390 cases (81.9%) overall, whereas surgery based on groin US findings alone occurred in 5 of 336 cases (1.5%). CONCLUSION: Routine groin US was frequently performed before general surgery consultation, whether a hernia was detectable on clinical examination or not. Positive groin US results alone infrequently affected whether the patient proceeded to surgery. Clinical examination findings played a larger role in surgical decision-making than groin US results. Eliminating the practice of routine groin US may provide considerable health care cost savings. CMA Impact Inc. 2022-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9484611/ /pubmed/36104044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.003421 Text en © 2022 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Marcil, Gabriel
Schendel, Jennifer
Tong, Ryan
Mitchell, Philip
Church, Neal
Reso, Artan
Ball, Chad
Gill, Richdeep
Debru, Estifanos
The role of routine groin ultrasonography in the management of inguinal hernia
title The role of routine groin ultrasonography in the management of inguinal hernia
title_full The role of routine groin ultrasonography in the management of inguinal hernia
title_fullStr The role of routine groin ultrasonography in the management of inguinal hernia
title_full_unstemmed The role of routine groin ultrasonography in the management of inguinal hernia
title_short The role of routine groin ultrasonography in the management of inguinal hernia
title_sort role of routine groin ultrasonography in the management of inguinal hernia
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9484611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36104044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.003421
work_keys_str_mv AT marcilgabriel theroleofroutinegroinultrasonographyinthemanagementofinguinalhernia
AT schendeljennifer theroleofroutinegroinultrasonographyinthemanagementofinguinalhernia
AT tongryan theroleofroutinegroinultrasonographyinthemanagementofinguinalhernia
AT mitchellphilip theroleofroutinegroinultrasonographyinthemanagementofinguinalhernia
AT churchneal theroleofroutinegroinultrasonographyinthemanagementofinguinalhernia
AT resoartan theroleofroutinegroinultrasonographyinthemanagementofinguinalhernia
AT ballchad theroleofroutinegroinultrasonographyinthemanagementofinguinalhernia
AT gillrichdeep theroleofroutinegroinultrasonographyinthemanagementofinguinalhernia
AT debruestifanos theroleofroutinegroinultrasonographyinthemanagementofinguinalhernia
AT marcilgabriel roleofroutinegroinultrasonographyinthemanagementofinguinalhernia
AT schendeljennifer roleofroutinegroinultrasonographyinthemanagementofinguinalhernia
AT tongryan roleofroutinegroinultrasonographyinthemanagementofinguinalhernia
AT mitchellphilip roleofroutinegroinultrasonographyinthemanagementofinguinalhernia
AT churchneal roleofroutinegroinultrasonographyinthemanagementofinguinalhernia
AT resoartan roleofroutinegroinultrasonographyinthemanagementofinguinalhernia
AT ballchad roleofroutinegroinultrasonographyinthemanagementofinguinalhernia
AT gillrichdeep roleofroutinegroinultrasonographyinthemanagementofinguinalhernia
AT debruestifanos roleofroutinegroinultrasonographyinthemanagementofinguinalhernia