Cargando…
Comparative efficacy and safety of caffeine citrate and aminophylline in treating apnea of prematurity: A systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Methylxanthine, including caffeine citrate and aminophylline, is the most common pharmacologic treatment for apnea of prematurity. However, due to the lack of high-quality evidence, there are no clear recommendations or guidelines on how to choose between caffeine and aminophylline. OBJE...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9484669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36121807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274882 |
_version_ | 1784791922934546432 |
---|---|
author | Miao, Yiqun Zhou, Yun Zhao, Shuliang Liu, Wenwen Wang, Aihua Zhang, Yuanyuan Li, Yanan Jiang, Huimin |
author_facet | Miao, Yiqun Zhou, Yun Zhao, Shuliang Liu, Wenwen Wang, Aihua Zhang, Yuanyuan Li, Yanan Jiang, Huimin |
author_sort | Miao, Yiqun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Methylxanthine, including caffeine citrate and aminophylline, is the most common pharmacologic treatment for apnea of prematurity. However, due to the lack of high-quality evidence, there are no clear recommendations or guidelines on how to choose between caffeine and aminophylline. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of caffeine and aminophylline for apnea of prematurity, and provide reliable evidence for clinical medication in the treatment for apnea of prematurity. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Embase, EBSCO, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched from May 1975 to June 2022. RESULTS: Ten studies including a total of 923 preterm infants were evaluated. Our results showed that there was no significant difference in the effective rate of 1-3days between caffeine and aminophylline (OR 1.05, 95%CI: 0.40–2.74, P = 0.914). However, for side effects such as tachycardia (OR 0.22, 95%CI: 0.13–0.37, P<0.001) and feeding intolerance (OR 0.40, 95%CI: 0.23–0.70, P = 0.001), the incidence rate was lower in the caffeine group compared with the aminophylline group. No significant difference was found in hyperglycemia (OR 0.45, 95%CI: 0.19–1.05, P = 0.064). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis reveals that caffeine citrate and aminophylline have similar therapeutic effectiveness on respiratory function, but caffeine has fewer side effects and should be considered first for treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9484669 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94846692022-09-20 Comparative efficacy and safety of caffeine citrate and aminophylline in treating apnea of prematurity: A systematic review and meta-analysis Miao, Yiqun Zhou, Yun Zhao, Shuliang Liu, Wenwen Wang, Aihua Zhang, Yuanyuan Li, Yanan Jiang, Huimin PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Methylxanthine, including caffeine citrate and aminophylline, is the most common pharmacologic treatment for apnea of prematurity. However, due to the lack of high-quality evidence, there are no clear recommendations or guidelines on how to choose between caffeine and aminophylline. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of caffeine and aminophylline for apnea of prematurity, and provide reliable evidence for clinical medication in the treatment for apnea of prematurity. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Embase, EBSCO, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched from May 1975 to June 2022. RESULTS: Ten studies including a total of 923 preterm infants were evaluated. Our results showed that there was no significant difference in the effective rate of 1-3days between caffeine and aminophylline (OR 1.05, 95%CI: 0.40–2.74, P = 0.914). However, for side effects such as tachycardia (OR 0.22, 95%CI: 0.13–0.37, P<0.001) and feeding intolerance (OR 0.40, 95%CI: 0.23–0.70, P = 0.001), the incidence rate was lower in the caffeine group compared with the aminophylline group. No significant difference was found in hyperglycemia (OR 0.45, 95%CI: 0.19–1.05, P = 0.064). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis reveals that caffeine citrate and aminophylline have similar therapeutic effectiveness on respiratory function, but caffeine has fewer side effects and should be considered first for treatment. Public Library of Science 2022-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9484669/ /pubmed/36121807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274882 Text en © 2022 Miao et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Miao, Yiqun Zhou, Yun Zhao, Shuliang Liu, Wenwen Wang, Aihua Zhang, Yuanyuan Li, Yanan Jiang, Huimin Comparative efficacy and safety of caffeine citrate and aminophylline in treating apnea of prematurity: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Comparative efficacy and safety of caffeine citrate and aminophylline in treating apnea of prematurity: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparative efficacy and safety of caffeine citrate and aminophylline in treating apnea of prematurity: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparative efficacy and safety of caffeine citrate and aminophylline in treating apnea of prematurity: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative efficacy and safety of caffeine citrate and aminophylline in treating apnea of prematurity: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparative efficacy and safety of caffeine citrate and aminophylline in treating apnea of prematurity: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparative efficacy and safety of caffeine citrate and aminophylline in treating apnea of prematurity: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9484669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36121807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274882 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT miaoyiqun comparativeefficacyandsafetyofcaffeinecitrateandaminophyllineintreatingapneaofprematurityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhouyun comparativeefficacyandsafetyofcaffeinecitrateandaminophyllineintreatingapneaofprematurityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhaoshuliang comparativeefficacyandsafetyofcaffeinecitrateandaminophyllineintreatingapneaofprematurityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuwenwen comparativeefficacyandsafetyofcaffeinecitrateandaminophyllineintreatingapneaofprematurityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangaihua comparativeefficacyandsafetyofcaffeinecitrateandaminophyllineintreatingapneaofprematurityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangyuanyuan comparativeefficacyandsafetyofcaffeinecitrateandaminophyllineintreatingapneaofprematurityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liyanan comparativeefficacyandsafetyofcaffeinecitrateandaminophyllineintreatingapneaofprematurityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jianghuimin comparativeefficacyandsafetyofcaffeinecitrateandaminophyllineintreatingapneaofprematurityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |