Cargando…

Comparative efficacy and safety of caffeine citrate and aminophylline in treating apnea of prematurity: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Methylxanthine, including caffeine citrate and aminophylline, is the most common pharmacologic treatment for apnea of prematurity. However, due to the lack of high-quality evidence, there are no clear recommendations or guidelines on how to choose between caffeine and aminophylline. OBJE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miao, Yiqun, Zhou, Yun, Zhao, Shuliang, Liu, Wenwen, Wang, Aihua, Zhang, Yuanyuan, Li, Yanan, Jiang, Huimin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9484669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36121807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274882
_version_ 1784791922934546432
author Miao, Yiqun
Zhou, Yun
Zhao, Shuliang
Liu, Wenwen
Wang, Aihua
Zhang, Yuanyuan
Li, Yanan
Jiang, Huimin
author_facet Miao, Yiqun
Zhou, Yun
Zhao, Shuliang
Liu, Wenwen
Wang, Aihua
Zhang, Yuanyuan
Li, Yanan
Jiang, Huimin
author_sort Miao, Yiqun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Methylxanthine, including caffeine citrate and aminophylline, is the most common pharmacologic treatment for apnea of prematurity. However, due to the lack of high-quality evidence, there are no clear recommendations or guidelines on how to choose between caffeine and aminophylline. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of caffeine and aminophylline for apnea of prematurity, and provide reliable evidence for clinical medication in the treatment for apnea of prematurity. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Embase, EBSCO, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched from May 1975 to June 2022. RESULTS: Ten studies including a total of 923 preterm infants were evaluated. Our results showed that there was no significant difference in the effective rate of 1-3days between caffeine and aminophylline (OR 1.05, 95%CI: 0.40–2.74, P = 0.914). However, for side effects such as tachycardia (OR 0.22, 95%CI: 0.13–0.37, P<0.001) and feeding intolerance (OR 0.40, 95%CI: 0.23–0.70, P = 0.001), the incidence rate was lower in the caffeine group compared with the aminophylline group. No significant difference was found in hyperglycemia (OR 0.45, 95%CI: 0.19–1.05, P = 0.064). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis reveals that caffeine citrate and aminophylline have similar therapeutic effectiveness on respiratory function, but caffeine has fewer side effects and should be considered first for treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9484669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94846692022-09-20 Comparative efficacy and safety of caffeine citrate and aminophylline in treating apnea of prematurity: A systematic review and meta-analysis Miao, Yiqun Zhou, Yun Zhao, Shuliang Liu, Wenwen Wang, Aihua Zhang, Yuanyuan Li, Yanan Jiang, Huimin PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Methylxanthine, including caffeine citrate and aminophylline, is the most common pharmacologic treatment for apnea of prematurity. However, due to the lack of high-quality evidence, there are no clear recommendations or guidelines on how to choose between caffeine and aminophylline. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of caffeine and aminophylline for apnea of prematurity, and provide reliable evidence for clinical medication in the treatment for apnea of prematurity. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Embase, EBSCO, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched from May 1975 to June 2022. RESULTS: Ten studies including a total of 923 preterm infants were evaluated. Our results showed that there was no significant difference in the effective rate of 1-3days between caffeine and aminophylline (OR 1.05, 95%CI: 0.40–2.74, P = 0.914). However, for side effects such as tachycardia (OR 0.22, 95%CI: 0.13–0.37, P<0.001) and feeding intolerance (OR 0.40, 95%CI: 0.23–0.70, P = 0.001), the incidence rate was lower in the caffeine group compared with the aminophylline group. No significant difference was found in hyperglycemia (OR 0.45, 95%CI: 0.19–1.05, P = 0.064). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis reveals that caffeine citrate and aminophylline have similar therapeutic effectiveness on respiratory function, but caffeine has fewer side effects and should be considered first for treatment. Public Library of Science 2022-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9484669/ /pubmed/36121807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274882 Text en © 2022 Miao et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Miao, Yiqun
Zhou, Yun
Zhao, Shuliang
Liu, Wenwen
Wang, Aihua
Zhang, Yuanyuan
Li, Yanan
Jiang, Huimin
Comparative efficacy and safety of caffeine citrate and aminophylline in treating apnea of prematurity: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Comparative efficacy and safety of caffeine citrate and aminophylline in treating apnea of prematurity: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Comparative efficacy and safety of caffeine citrate and aminophylline in treating apnea of prematurity: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy and safety of caffeine citrate and aminophylline in treating apnea of prematurity: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy and safety of caffeine citrate and aminophylline in treating apnea of prematurity: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Comparative efficacy and safety of caffeine citrate and aminophylline in treating apnea of prematurity: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort comparative efficacy and safety of caffeine citrate and aminophylline in treating apnea of prematurity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9484669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36121807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274882
work_keys_str_mv AT miaoyiqun comparativeefficacyandsafetyofcaffeinecitrateandaminophyllineintreatingapneaofprematurityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhouyun comparativeefficacyandsafetyofcaffeinecitrateandaminophyllineintreatingapneaofprematurityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaoshuliang comparativeefficacyandsafetyofcaffeinecitrateandaminophyllineintreatingapneaofprematurityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuwenwen comparativeefficacyandsafetyofcaffeinecitrateandaminophyllineintreatingapneaofprematurityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangaihua comparativeefficacyandsafetyofcaffeinecitrateandaminophyllineintreatingapneaofprematurityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangyuanyuan comparativeefficacyandsafetyofcaffeinecitrateandaminophyllineintreatingapneaofprematurityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liyanan comparativeefficacyandsafetyofcaffeinecitrateandaminophyllineintreatingapneaofprematurityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jianghuimin comparativeefficacyandsafetyofcaffeinecitrateandaminophyllineintreatingapneaofprematurityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis