Cargando…

Outpatient Compared With Inpatient Preinduction Cervical Ripening Using a Synthetic Osmotic Dilator: A Randomized Clinical Trial

To assess whether outpatient cervical ripening with a synthetic osmotic dilator shortens the length of hospital stay in term pregnancies undergoing labor induction. METHODS: Pregnant participants scheduled for labor induction at term with unfavorable cervix (less than 3-cm dilated and less than 60%...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saad, Antonio F., Gavara, Rachana, Senguttuvan, Rosemary Noel, Goncharov, Arena D., Berry, Marissa, Eid, Joe, Goldman, Brett, Nutter, Ana, Moutos, Christopher P., Wang, Amanda M., Saade, George R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9484761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36083097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004942
_version_ 1784791942049038336
author Saad, Antonio F.
Gavara, Rachana
Senguttuvan, Rosemary Noel
Goncharov, Arena D.
Berry, Marissa
Eid, Joe
Goldman, Brett
Nutter, Ana
Moutos, Christopher P.
Wang, Amanda M.
Saade, George R.
author_facet Saad, Antonio F.
Gavara, Rachana
Senguttuvan, Rosemary Noel
Goncharov, Arena D.
Berry, Marissa
Eid, Joe
Goldman, Brett
Nutter, Ana
Moutos, Christopher P.
Wang, Amanda M.
Saade, George R.
author_sort Saad, Antonio F.
collection PubMed
description To assess whether outpatient cervical ripening with a synthetic osmotic dilator shortens the length of hospital stay in term pregnancies undergoing labor induction. METHODS: Pregnant participants scheduled for labor induction at term with unfavorable cervix (less than 3-cm dilated and less than 60% effaced) and not requiring inpatient maternal or fetal monitoring were consented, and synthetic osmotic dilator rods were inserted on the day of scheduled induction. After reassuring fetal heart tracing, patients randomized to the outpatient group were asked to return 12 hours after insertion or sooner if needed. Those randomized to the inpatient group remained in the hospital. After the first round of ripening, additional ripening, oxytocin, and labor management were left up to the clinical health care professionals. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with hospital stays longer than 48 hours. We estimated that a sample size of 338 would provide 85% power to detect a 30% difference between groups. RESULTS: From November 2018 to November 2021, 339 participants were randomized (171 inpatient, 167 outpatient, one withdrawal). Four patients in the outpatient group were admitted before12 hours for suspected labor and rupture of membranes, and 19 in the inpatient group had the device removed before 12 hours. The proportion of participants with hospital stays longer than 48 hours was lower in the outpatient group compared with the inpatient group (89 [53%] vs 152 [89%], relative risk [RR] 0.60, 95% CI 0.52–0.70). Patients in the outpatient group had a shorter total length of stay and time from admission to active labor. They were more likely to have a vaginal delivery within 24 hours of admission and were less likely to receive analgesics during ripening. Route of delivery and other maternal and neonatal outcomes were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: Outpatient cervical ripening with a cervical osmotic dilator decreased hospital stay compared with inpatient ripening, without significant adverse outcomes. FUNDING SOURCE: Medicem Technology s.r.o., Czech Republic. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03665688.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9484761
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94847612022-09-21 Outpatient Compared With Inpatient Preinduction Cervical Ripening Using a Synthetic Osmotic Dilator: A Randomized Clinical Trial Saad, Antonio F. Gavara, Rachana Senguttuvan, Rosemary Noel Goncharov, Arena D. Berry, Marissa Eid, Joe Goldman, Brett Nutter, Ana Moutos, Christopher P. Wang, Amanda M. Saade, George R. Obstet Gynecol Contents To assess whether outpatient cervical ripening with a synthetic osmotic dilator shortens the length of hospital stay in term pregnancies undergoing labor induction. METHODS: Pregnant participants scheduled for labor induction at term with unfavorable cervix (less than 3-cm dilated and less than 60% effaced) and not requiring inpatient maternal or fetal monitoring were consented, and synthetic osmotic dilator rods were inserted on the day of scheduled induction. After reassuring fetal heart tracing, patients randomized to the outpatient group were asked to return 12 hours after insertion or sooner if needed. Those randomized to the inpatient group remained in the hospital. After the first round of ripening, additional ripening, oxytocin, and labor management were left up to the clinical health care professionals. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with hospital stays longer than 48 hours. We estimated that a sample size of 338 would provide 85% power to detect a 30% difference between groups. RESULTS: From November 2018 to November 2021, 339 participants were randomized (171 inpatient, 167 outpatient, one withdrawal). Four patients in the outpatient group were admitted before12 hours for suspected labor and rupture of membranes, and 19 in the inpatient group had the device removed before 12 hours. The proportion of participants with hospital stays longer than 48 hours was lower in the outpatient group compared with the inpatient group (89 [53%] vs 152 [89%], relative risk [RR] 0.60, 95% CI 0.52–0.70). Patients in the outpatient group had a shorter total length of stay and time from admission to active labor. They were more likely to have a vaginal delivery within 24 hours of admission and were less likely to receive analgesics during ripening. Route of delivery and other maternal and neonatal outcomes were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: Outpatient cervical ripening with a cervical osmotic dilator decreased hospital stay compared with inpatient ripening, without significant adverse outcomes. FUNDING SOURCE: Medicem Technology s.r.o., Czech Republic. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03665688. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-10 2022-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9484761/ /pubmed/36083097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004942 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Contents
Saad, Antonio F.
Gavara, Rachana
Senguttuvan, Rosemary Noel
Goncharov, Arena D.
Berry, Marissa
Eid, Joe
Goldman, Brett
Nutter, Ana
Moutos, Christopher P.
Wang, Amanda M.
Saade, George R.
Outpatient Compared With Inpatient Preinduction Cervical Ripening Using a Synthetic Osmotic Dilator: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title Outpatient Compared With Inpatient Preinduction Cervical Ripening Using a Synthetic Osmotic Dilator: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Outpatient Compared With Inpatient Preinduction Cervical Ripening Using a Synthetic Osmotic Dilator: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Outpatient Compared With Inpatient Preinduction Cervical Ripening Using a Synthetic Osmotic Dilator: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Outpatient Compared With Inpatient Preinduction Cervical Ripening Using a Synthetic Osmotic Dilator: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Outpatient Compared With Inpatient Preinduction Cervical Ripening Using a Synthetic Osmotic Dilator: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort outpatient compared with inpatient preinduction cervical ripening using a synthetic osmotic dilator: a randomized clinical trial
topic Contents
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9484761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36083097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004942
work_keys_str_mv AT saadantoniof outpatientcomparedwithinpatientpreinductioncervicalripeningusingasyntheticosmoticdilatorarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT gavararachana outpatientcomparedwithinpatientpreinductioncervicalripeningusingasyntheticosmoticdilatorarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT senguttuvanrosemarynoel outpatientcomparedwithinpatientpreinductioncervicalripeningusingasyntheticosmoticdilatorarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT goncharovarenad outpatientcomparedwithinpatientpreinductioncervicalripeningusingasyntheticosmoticdilatorarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT berrymarissa outpatientcomparedwithinpatientpreinductioncervicalripeningusingasyntheticosmoticdilatorarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT eidjoe outpatientcomparedwithinpatientpreinductioncervicalripeningusingasyntheticosmoticdilatorarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT goldmanbrett outpatientcomparedwithinpatientpreinductioncervicalripeningusingasyntheticosmoticdilatorarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT nutterana outpatientcomparedwithinpatientpreinductioncervicalripeningusingasyntheticosmoticdilatorarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT moutoschristopherp outpatientcomparedwithinpatientpreinductioncervicalripeningusingasyntheticosmoticdilatorarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT wangamandam outpatientcomparedwithinpatientpreinductioncervicalripeningusingasyntheticosmoticdilatorarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT saadegeorger outpatientcomparedwithinpatientpreinductioncervicalripeningusingasyntheticosmoticdilatorarandomizedclinicaltrial