Cargando…

The Role of Publons in the Context of Open Peer Review

Publons was a peer reviewer rewards platform that aimed to recognize the contribution that academics made during peer review to a journal. For about 10 years of its existence, Publons became the most popular service among peer reviewers. Having gained traction and popularity, Publons was purchased i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A., Nazarovets, Serhii
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9484842/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12109-022-09914-0
_version_ 1784791959790944256
author Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A.
Nazarovets, Serhii
author_facet Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A.
Nazarovets, Serhii
author_sort Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A.
collection PubMed
description Publons was a peer reviewer rewards platform that aimed to recognize the contribution that academics made during peer review to a journal. For about 10 years of its existence, Publons became the most popular service among peer reviewers. Having gained traction and popularity, Publons was purchased in 2017 by Clarivate Analytics (now Clarivate), and many academics, journals and publishers invested time and effort to participate in Publons. Using Publons, various peer review-related experiments or pilot programs were initiated by some academic publishers regarding the introduction of open peer review into their journals’ editorial processes. In this paper, we examine pertinent literature related to Publons, and reflect on its benefits and flaws during its short-lived history. In mid-August 2022, Clarivate fused Publons into the Web of Science platform. Publons, as a brand peer review service, has now ceased to exist but some of the functionality remains in Web of Science while other aspects that used to be open and free at Publons are now paid-for services. We reflect on the effect of such experiments, which initially had bold and ambitious academic objectives to fortify peer review, on academics’ trust, especially when such projects become commercialized.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9484842
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94848422022-09-21 The Role of Publons in the Context of Open Peer Review Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A. Nazarovets, Serhii Pub Res Q Article Publons was a peer reviewer rewards platform that aimed to recognize the contribution that academics made during peer review to a journal. For about 10 years of its existence, Publons became the most popular service among peer reviewers. Having gained traction and popularity, Publons was purchased in 2017 by Clarivate Analytics (now Clarivate), and many academics, journals and publishers invested time and effort to participate in Publons. Using Publons, various peer review-related experiments or pilot programs were initiated by some academic publishers regarding the introduction of open peer review into their journals’ editorial processes. In this paper, we examine pertinent literature related to Publons, and reflect on its benefits and flaws during its short-lived history. In mid-August 2022, Clarivate fused Publons into the Web of Science platform. Publons, as a brand peer review service, has now ceased to exist but some of the functionality remains in Web of Science while other aspects that used to be open and free at Publons are now paid-for services. We reflect on the effect of such experiments, which initially had bold and ambitious academic objectives to fortify peer review, on academics’ trust, especially when such projects become commercialized. Springer US 2022-09-19 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9484842/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12109-022-09914-0 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A.
Nazarovets, Serhii
The Role of Publons in the Context of Open Peer Review
title The Role of Publons in the Context of Open Peer Review
title_full The Role of Publons in the Context of Open Peer Review
title_fullStr The Role of Publons in the Context of Open Peer Review
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Publons in the Context of Open Peer Review
title_short The Role of Publons in the Context of Open Peer Review
title_sort role of publons in the context of open peer review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9484842/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12109-022-09914-0
work_keys_str_mv AT teixeiradasilvajaimea theroleofpublonsinthecontextofopenpeerreview
AT nazarovetsserhii theroleofpublonsinthecontextofopenpeerreview
AT teixeiradasilvajaimea roleofpublonsinthecontextofopenpeerreview
AT nazarovetsserhii roleofpublonsinthecontextofopenpeerreview