Cargando…
The Role of Publons in the Context of Open Peer Review
Publons was a peer reviewer rewards platform that aimed to recognize the contribution that academics made during peer review to a journal. For about 10 years of its existence, Publons became the most popular service among peer reviewers. Having gained traction and popularity, Publons was purchased i...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9484842/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12109-022-09914-0 |
_version_ | 1784791959790944256 |
---|---|
author | Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A. Nazarovets, Serhii |
author_facet | Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A. Nazarovets, Serhii |
author_sort | Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Publons was a peer reviewer rewards platform that aimed to recognize the contribution that academics made during peer review to a journal. For about 10 years of its existence, Publons became the most popular service among peer reviewers. Having gained traction and popularity, Publons was purchased in 2017 by Clarivate Analytics (now Clarivate), and many academics, journals and publishers invested time and effort to participate in Publons. Using Publons, various peer review-related experiments or pilot programs were initiated by some academic publishers regarding the introduction of open peer review into their journals’ editorial processes. In this paper, we examine pertinent literature related to Publons, and reflect on its benefits and flaws during its short-lived history. In mid-August 2022, Clarivate fused Publons into the Web of Science platform. Publons, as a brand peer review service, has now ceased to exist but some of the functionality remains in Web of Science while other aspects that used to be open and free at Publons are now paid-for services. We reflect on the effect of such experiments, which initially had bold and ambitious academic objectives to fortify peer review, on academics’ trust, especially when such projects become commercialized. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9484842 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94848422022-09-21 The Role of Publons in the Context of Open Peer Review Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A. Nazarovets, Serhii Pub Res Q Article Publons was a peer reviewer rewards platform that aimed to recognize the contribution that academics made during peer review to a journal. For about 10 years of its existence, Publons became the most popular service among peer reviewers. Having gained traction and popularity, Publons was purchased in 2017 by Clarivate Analytics (now Clarivate), and many academics, journals and publishers invested time and effort to participate in Publons. Using Publons, various peer review-related experiments or pilot programs were initiated by some academic publishers regarding the introduction of open peer review into their journals’ editorial processes. In this paper, we examine pertinent literature related to Publons, and reflect on its benefits and flaws during its short-lived history. In mid-August 2022, Clarivate fused Publons into the Web of Science platform. Publons, as a brand peer review service, has now ceased to exist but some of the functionality remains in Web of Science while other aspects that used to be open and free at Publons are now paid-for services. We reflect on the effect of such experiments, which initially had bold and ambitious academic objectives to fortify peer review, on academics’ trust, especially when such projects become commercialized. Springer US 2022-09-19 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9484842/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12109-022-09914-0 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A. Nazarovets, Serhii The Role of Publons in the Context of Open Peer Review |
title | The Role of Publons in the Context of Open Peer Review |
title_full | The Role of Publons in the Context of Open Peer Review |
title_fullStr | The Role of Publons in the Context of Open Peer Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Role of Publons in the Context of Open Peer Review |
title_short | The Role of Publons in the Context of Open Peer Review |
title_sort | role of publons in the context of open peer review |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9484842/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12109-022-09914-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT teixeiradasilvajaimea theroleofpublonsinthecontextofopenpeerreview AT nazarovetsserhii theroleofpublonsinthecontextofopenpeerreview AT teixeiradasilvajaimea roleofpublonsinthecontextofopenpeerreview AT nazarovetsserhii roleofpublonsinthecontextofopenpeerreview |