Cargando…

Accuracy and Safety of Robot-Assisted versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Posterior C1 Lateral Mass and C2 Pedicle Screw Internal Fixation for Atlantoaxial Dislocation: A Preliminary Study

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy, efficiency, and safety of robotic assistance (RA) and conventional fluoroscopy guidance for the placement of C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screws in posterior atlantoaxial fusion. METHODS: The data of patients who underwent posterior C1–C2 screw fixation (Goel-Ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhan, Jiheng, Xu, Wenke, Lin, Jinhao, Luan, Jiyao, Hou, Yu, Wang, Yufeng, Li, Yongjin, Chen, Bolai, Lin, Dingkun, Chen, Shudong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9484877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36132077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8508113
_version_ 1784791968647217152
author Zhan, Jiheng
Xu, Wenke
Lin, Jinhao
Luan, Jiyao
Hou, Yu
Wang, Yufeng
Li, Yongjin
Chen, Bolai
Lin, Dingkun
Chen, Shudong
author_facet Zhan, Jiheng
Xu, Wenke
Lin, Jinhao
Luan, Jiyao
Hou, Yu
Wang, Yufeng
Li, Yongjin
Chen, Bolai
Lin, Dingkun
Chen, Shudong
author_sort Zhan, Jiheng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy, efficiency, and safety of robotic assistance (RA) and conventional fluoroscopy guidance for the placement of C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screws in posterior atlantoaxial fusion. METHODS: The data of patients who underwent posterior C1–C2 screw fixation (Goel-Harm's technique) in our hospital from August 2014 to March 2021 were retrospectively evaluated, including 14 cases under fluoroscopic guidance and 11 cases under RA. The hospital records, radiographic results, surgical data, and follow-up records were reviewed. Accuracy of screw placement was assessed using the Gertzbein and Robbins scale, and clinical outcomes were evaluated by Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, visual analogue scale (VAS), modified MacNab criteria, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of both groups were similar. The mean estimated blood loss in the fluoroscopic guidance and RA groups was 205.7 ± 80.3 mL and 120.9 ± 31.9 mL, respectively (p = 0.03). The mean surgical duration was 34 min longer with RA compared to that performed with free-hand (FH) method (p = 0.15). In addition, lower intraoperative radiation exposure was detected in the RA group (12.4 ± 1.4 mGy/screw) versus the FH (19.9 ± 2.1 mGy/screw) group (p = 0.01). The proportion of “clinically acceptable” screws (graded 0 and I) was higher in the RA group (93.2%) than that in the FH group (87.5%, p = 0.04). There was no significant difference in the increase of JOA score and decrease of VAS score between the two surgical procedures. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in overall clinical outcome between the two groups and no neurovascular complications associated with screw insertion. CONCLUSIONS: RA is a safe and potentially more accurate alternative to the conventional fluoroscopic-guided FH technique for posterior atlantoaxial internal fixation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9484877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94848772022-09-20 Accuracy and Safety of Robot-Assisted versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Posterior C1 Lateral Mass and C2 Pedicle Screw Internal Fixation for Atlantoaxial Dislocation: A Preliminary Study Zhan, Jiheng Xu, Wenke Lin, Jinhao Luan, Jiyao Hou, Yu Wang, Yufeng Li, Yongjin Chen, Bolai Lin, Dingkun Chen, Shudong Biomed Res Int Research Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy, efficiency, and safety of robotic assistance (RA) and conventional fluoroscopy guidance for the placement of C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screws in posterior atlantoaxial fusion. METHODS: The data of patients who underwent posterior C1–C2 screw fixation (Goel-Harm's technique) in our hospital from August 2014 to March 2021 were retrospectively evaluated, including 14 cases under fluoroscopic guidance and 11 cases under RA. The hospital records, radiographic results, surgical data, and follow-up records were reviewed. Accuracy of screw placement was assessed using the Gertzbein and Robbins scale, and clinical outcomes were evaluated by Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, visual analogue scale (VAS), modified MacNab criteria, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of both groups were similar. The mean estimated blood loss in the fluoroscopic guidance and RA groups was 205.7 ± 80.3 mL and 120.9 ± 31.9 mL, respectively (p = 0.03). The mean surgical duration was 34 min longer with RA compared to that performed with free-hand (FH) method (p = 0.15). In addition, lower intraoperative radiation exposure was detected in the RA group (12.4 ± 1.4 mGy/screw) versus the FH (19.9 ± 2.1 mGy/screw) group (p = 0.01). The proportion of “clinically acceptable” screws (graded 0 and I) was higher in the RA group (93.2%) than that in the FH group (87.5%, p = 0.04). There was no significant difference in the increase of JOA score and decrease of VAS score between the two surgical procedures. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in overall clinical outcome between the two groups and no neurovascular complications associated with screw insertion. CONCLUSIONS: RA is a safe and potentially more accurate alternative to the conventional fluoroscopic-guided FH technique for posterior atlantoaxial internal fixation. Hindawi 2022-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9484877/ /pubmed/36132077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8508113 Text en Copyright © 2022 Jiheng Zhan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhan, Jiheng
Xu, Wenke
Lin, Jinhao
Luan, Jiyao
Hou, Yu
Wang, Yufeng
Li, Yongjin
Chen, Bolai
Lin, Dingkun
Chen, Shudong
Accuracy and Safety of Robot-Assisted versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Posterior C1 Lateral Mass and C2 Pedicle Screw Internal Fixation for Atlantoaxial Dislocation: A Preliminary Study
title Accuracy and Safety of Robot-Assisted versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Posterior C1 Lateral Mass and C2 Pedicle Screw Internal Fixation for Atlantoaxial Dislocation: A Preliminary Study
title_full Accuracy and Safety of Robot-Assisted versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Posterior C1 Lateral Mass and C2 Pedicle Screw Internal Fixation for Atlantoaxial Dislocation: A Preliminary Study
title_fullStr Accuracy and Safety of Robot-Assisted versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Posterior C1 Lateral Mass and C2 Pedicle Screw Internal Fixation for Atlantoaxial Dislocation: A Preliminary Study
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy and Safety of Robot-Assisted versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Posterior C1 Lateral Mass and C2 Pedicle Screw Internal Fixation for Atlantoaxial Dislocation: A Preliminary Study
title_short Accuracy and Safety of Robot-Assisted versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Posterior C1 Lateral Mass and C2 Pedicle Screw Internal Fixation for Atlantoaxial Dislocation: A Preliminary Study
title_sort accuracy and safety of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-guided posterior c1 lateral mass and c2 pedicle screw internal fixation for atlantoaxial dislocation: a preliminary study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9484877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36132077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8508113
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanjiheng accuracyandsafetyofrobotassistedversusfluoroscopyguidedposteriorc1lateralmassandc2pediclescrewinternalfixationforatlantoaxialdislocationapreliminarystudy
AT xuwenke accuracyandsafetyofrobotassistedversusfluoroscopyguidedposteriorc1lateralmassandc2pediclescrewinternalfixationforatlantoaxialdislocationapreliminarystudy
AT linjinhao accuracyandsafetyofrobotassistedversusfluoroscopyguidedposteriorc1lateralmassandc2pediclescrewinternalfixationforatlantoaxialdislocationapreliminarystudy
AT luanjiyao accuracyandsafetyofrobotassistedversusfluoroscopyguidedposteriorc1lateralmassandc2pediclescrewinternalfixationforatlantoaxialdislocationapreliminarystudy
AT houyu accuracyandsafetyofrobotassistedversusfluoroscopyguidedposteriorc1lateralmassandc2pediclescrewinternalfixationforatlantoaxialdislocationapreliminarystudy
AT wangyufeng accuracyandsafetyofrobotassistedversusfluoroscopyguidedposteriorc1lateralmassandc2pediclescrewinternalfixationforatlantoaxialdislocationapreliminarystudy
AT liyongjin accuracyandsafetyofrobotassistedversusfluoroscopyguidedposteriorc1lateralmassandc2pediclescrewinternalfixationforatlantoaxialdislocationapreliminarystudy
AT chenbolai accuracyandsafetyofrobotassistedversusfluoroscopyguidedposteriorc1lateralmassandc2pediclescrewinternalfixationforatlantoaxialdislocationapreliminarystudy
AT lindingkun accuracyandsafetyofrobotassistedversusfluoroscopyguidedposteriorc1lateralmassandc2pediclescrewinternalfixationforatlantoaxialdislocationapreliminarystudy
AT chenshudong accuracyandsafetyofrobotassistedversusfluoroscopyguidedposteriorc1lateralmassandc2pediclescrewinternalfixationforatlantoaxialdislocationapreliminarystudy