Cargando…

The significance of the extent of tissue embedding for the detection of incidental prostate carcinoma on transurethral prostate resection material: the more, the better?

The aim of this study is to investigate the incidental prostate cancer (iPCa) detection rates of different embedding methods in a large, contemporary cohort of patients with bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) treated with transurethral surgery. We relied on an institutional tertiary-care database to i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Köllermann, Jens, Hoeh, Benedikt, Ruppel, Daniel, Smith, Kevin, Reis, Henning, Wenzel, Mike, Preisser, Felix, Kosiba, Marina, Mandel, Philipp, Karakiewicz, Pierre I., Becker, Andreas, Chun, Felix K. H., Wild, Peter, Kluth, Luis A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9485088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35710851
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-022-03331-6
_version_ 1784792014330527744
author Köllermann, Jens
Hoeh, Benedikt
Ruppel, Daniel
Smith, Kevin
Reis, Henning
Wenzel, Mike
Preisser, Felix
Kosiba, Marina
Mandel, Philipp
Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
Becker, Andreas
Chun, Felix K. H.
Wild, Peter
Kluth, Luis A.
author_facet Köllermann, Jens
Hoeh, Benedikt
Ruppel, Daniel
Smith, Kevin
Reis, Henning
Wenzel, Mike
Preisser, Felix
Kosiba, Marina
Mandel, Philipp
Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
Becker, Andreas
Chun, Felix K. H.
Wild, Peter
Kluth, Luis A.
author_sort Köllermann, Jens
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study is to investigate the incidental prostate cancer (iPCa) detection rates of different embedding methods in a large, contemporary cohort of patients with bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) treated with transurethral surgery. We relied on an institutional tertiary-care database to identify BOO patients who underwent either transurethral loop resection or laser (Holmium:yttrium–aluminium garnet) enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) between 01/2012 and 12/2019. Embedding methods differed with regard to the extent of the additional prostate tissue submitted following the first ten cassettes of primary embedding (cohort A: one [additional] cassette/10 g residual tissue vs. cohort B: complete embedding of the residual tissue). Detection rates of iPCa among the different embedding methods were compared. Subsequently, subgroup analyses by embedding protocol were repeated in HoLEP-treated patients only. In the overall cohort, the iPCa detection rate was 11% (46/420). In cohort A (n = 299), tissue embedding resulted in a median of 8 cassettes/patient (range 1–38) vs. a median of 15 (range 2–74) in cohort B (n = 121) (p < .001). The iPCa detection rate was 8% (23/299) and 19% (23/121) in cohort A vs. cohort B, respectively (p < .001). Virtual reduction of the number of tissue cassettes to ten cassettes resulted in a iPCa detection rate of 96% in both cohorts, missing one stage T1a/ISUP grade 1 carcinoma. Increasing the number of cassettes by two and eight cassettes, respectively, resulted in a detection rate of 100% in both cohorts without revealing high-grade carcinomas. Subgroup analyses in HoLEP patients confirmed these findings, demonstrated by a 100 vs. 96% iPCa detection rate following examination of the first ten cassettes, missing one case of T1a/ISUP 1. Examination of 8 additional cassettes resulted in a 100% detection rate. The extent of embedding of material obtained from transurethral prostate resection correlates with the iPCa detection rate. However, the submission of 10 cassettes appears to be a reasonable threshold to reduce resource utilization while maintaining secure cancer detection. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00428-022-03331-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9485088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94850882022-09-21 The significance of the extent of tissue embedding for the detection of incidental prostate carcinoma on transurethral prostate resection material: the more, the better? Köllermann, Jens Hoeh, Benedikt Ruppel, Daniel Smith, Kevin Reis, Henning Wenzel, Mike Preisser, Felix Kosiba, Marina Mandel, Philipp Karakiewicz, Pierre I. Becker, Andreas Chun, Felix K. H. Wild, Peter Kluth, Luis A. Virchows Arch Original Article The aim of this study is to investigate the incidental prostate cancer (iPCa) detection rates of different embedding methods in a large, contemporary cohort of patients with bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) treated with transurethral surgery. We relied on an institutional tertiary-care database to identify BOO patients who underwent either transurethral loop resection or laser (Holmium:yttrium–aluminium garnet) enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) between 01/2012 and 12/2019. Embedding methods differed with regard to the extent of the additional prostate tissue submitted following the first ten cassettes of primary embedding (cohort A: one [additional] cassette/10 g residual tissue vs. cohort B: complete embedding of the residual tissue). Detection rates of iPCa among the different embedding methods were compared. Subsequently, subgroup analyses by embedding protocol were repeated in HoLEP-treated patients only. In the overall cohort, the iPCa detection rate was 11% (46/420). In cohort A (n = 299), tissue embedding resulted in a median of 8 cassettes/patient (range 1–38) vs. a median of 15 (range 2–74) in cohort B (n = 121) (p < .001). The iPCa detection rate was 8% (23/299) and 19% (23/121) in cohort A vs. cohort B, respectively (p < .001). Virtual reduction of the number of tissue cassettes to ten cassettes resulted in a iPCa detection rate of 96% in both cohorts, missing one stage T1a/ISUP grade 1 carcinoma. Increasing the number of cassettes by two and eight cassettes, respectively, resulted in a detection rate of 100% in both cohorts without revealing high-grade carcinomas. Subgroup analyses in HoLEP patients confirmed these findings, demonstrated by a 100 vs. 96% iPCa detection rate following examination of the first ten cassettes, missing one case of T1a/ISUP 1. Examination of 8 additional cassettes resulted in a 100% detection rate. The extent of embedding of material obtained from transurethral prostate resection correlates with the iPCa detection rate. However, the submission of 10 cassettes appears to be a reasonable threshold to reduce resource utilization while maintaining secure cancer detection. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00428-022-03331-6. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-06-17 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9485088/ /pubmed/35710851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-022-03331-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Köllermann, Jens
Hoeh, Benedikt
Ruppel, Daniel
Smith, Kevin
Reis, Henning
Wenzel, Mike
Preisser, Felix
Kosiba, Marina
Mandel, Philipp
Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
Becker, Andreas
Chun, Felix K. H.
Wild, Peter
Kluth, Luis A.
The significance of the extent of tissue embedding for the detection of incidental prostate carcinoma on transurethral prostate resection material: the more, the better?
title The significance of the extent of tissue embedding for the detection of incidental prostate carcinoma on transurethral prostate resection material: the more, the better?
title_full The significance of the extent of tissue embedding for the detection of incidental prostate carcinoma on transurethral prostate resection material: the more, the better?
title_fullStr The significance of the extent of tissue embedding for the detection of incidental prostate carcinoma on transurethral prostate resection material: the more, the better?
title_full_unstemmed The significance of the extent of tissue embedding for the detection of incidental prostate carcinoma on transurethral prostate resection material: the more, the better?
title_short The significance of the extent of tissue embedding for the detection of incidental prostate carcinoma on transurethral prostate resection material: the more, the better?
title_sort significance of the extent of tissue embedding for the detection of incidental prostate carcinoma on transurethral prostate resection material: the more, the better?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9485088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35710851
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-022-03331-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kollermannjens thesignificanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter
AT hoehbenedikt thesignificanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter
AT ruppeldaniel thesignificanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter
AT smithkevin thesignificanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter
AT reishenning thesignificanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter
AT wenzelmike thesignificanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter
AT preisserfelix thesignificanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter
AT kosibamarina thesignificanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter
AT mandelphilipp thesignificanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter
AT karakiewiczpierrei thesignificanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter
AT beckerandreas thesignificanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter
AT chunfelixkh thesignificanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter
AT wildpeter thesignificanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter
AT kluthluisa thesignificanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter
AT kollermannjens significanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter
AT hoehbenedikt significanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter
AT ruppeldaniel significanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter
AT smithkevin significanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter
AT reishenning significanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter
AT wenzelmike significanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter
AT preisserfelix significanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter
AT kosibamarina significanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter
AT mandelphilipp significanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter
AT karakiewiczpierrei significanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter
AT beckerandreas significanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter
AT chunfelixkh significanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter
AT wildpeter significanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter
AT kluthluisa significanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter