Cargando…
The significance of the extent of tissue embedding for the detection of incidental prostate carcinoma on transurethral prostate resection material: the more, the better?
The aim of this study is to investigate the incidental prostate cancer (iPCa) detection rates of different embedding methods in a large, contemporary cohort of patients with bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) treated with transurethral surgery. We relied on an institutional tertiary-care database to i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9485088/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35710851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-022-03331-6 |
_version_ | 1784792014330527744 |
---|---|
author | Köllermann, Jens Hoeh, Benedikt Ruppel, Daniel Smith, Kevin Reis, Henning Wenzel, Mike Preisser, Felix Kosiba, Marina Mandel, Philipp Karakiewicz, Pierre I. Becker, Andreas Chun, Felix K. H. Wild, Peter Kluth, Luis A. |
author_facet | Köllermann, Jens Hoeh, Benedikt Ruppel, Daniel Smith, Kevin Reis, Henning Wenzel, Mike Preisser, Felix Kosiba, Marina Mandel, Philipp Karakiewicz, Pierre I. Becker, Andreas Chun, Felix K. H. Wild, Peter Kluth, Luis A. |
author_sort | Köllermann, Jens |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study is to investigate the incidental prostate cancer (iPCa) detection rates of different embedding methods in a large, contemporary cohort of patients with bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) treated with transurethral surgery. We relied on an institutional tertiary-care database to identify BOO patients who underwent either transurethral loop resection or laser (Holmium:yttrium–aluminium garnet) enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) between 01/2012 and 12/2019. Embedding methods differed with regard to the extent of the additional prostate tissue submitted following the first ten cassettes of primary embedding (cohort A: one [additional] cassette/10 g residual tissue vs. cohort B: complete embedding of the residual tissue). Detection rates of iPCa among the different embedding methods were compared. Subsequently, subgroup analyses by embedding protocol were repeated in HoLEP-treated patients only. In the overall cohort, the iPCa detection rate was 11% (46/420). In cohort A (n = 299), tissue embedding resulted in a median of 8 cassettes/patient (range 1–38) vs. a median of 15 (range 2–74) in cohort B (n = 121) (p < .001). The iPCa detection rate was 8% (23/299) and 19% (23/121) in cohort A vs. cohort B, respectively (p < .001). Virtual reduction of the number of tissue cassettes to ten cassettes resulted in a iPCa detection rate of 96% in both cohorts, missing one stage T1a/ISUP grade 1 carcinoma. Increasing the number of cassettes by two and eight cassettes, respectively, resulted in a detection rate of 100% in both cohorts without revealing high-grade carcinomas. Subgroup analyses in HoLEP patients confirmed these findings, demonstrated by a 100 vs. 96% iPCa detection rate following examination of the first ten cassettes, missing one case of T1a/ISUP 1. Examination of 8 additional cassettes resulted in a 100% detection rate. The extent of embedding of material obtained from transurethral prostate resection correlates with the iPCa detection rate. However, the submission of 10 cassettes appears to be a reasonable threshold to reduce resource utilization while maintaining secure cancer detection. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00428-022-03331-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9485088 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94850882022-09-21 The significance of the extent of tissue embedding for the detection of incidental prostate carcinoma on transurethral prostate resection material: the more, the better? Köllermann, Jens Hoeh, Benedikt Ruppel, Daniel Smith, Kevin Reis, Henning Wenzel, Mike Preisser, Felix Kosiba, Marina Mandel, Philipp Karakiewicz, Pierre I. Becker, Andreas Chun, Felix K. H. Wild, Peter Kluth, Luis A. Virchows Arch Original Article The aim of this study is to investigate the incidental prostate cancer (iPCa) detection rates of different embedding methods in a large, contemporary cohort of patients with bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) treated with transurethral surgery. We relied on an institutional tertiary-care database to identify BOO patients who underwent either transurethral loop resection or laser (Holmium:yttrium–aluminium garnet) enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) between 01/2012 and 12/2019. Embedding methods differed with regard to the extent of the additional prostate tissue submitted following the first ten cassettes of primary embedding (cohort A: one [additional] cassette/10 g residual tissue vs. cohort B: complete embedding of the residual tissue). Detection rates of iPCa among the different embedding methods were compared. Subsequently, subgroup analyses by embedding protocol were repeated in HoLEP-treated patients only. In the overall cohort, the iPCa detection rate was 11% (46/420). In cohort A (n = 299), tissue embedding resulted in a median of 8 cassettes/patient (range 1–38) vs. a median of 15 (range 2–74) in cohort B (n = 121) (p < .001). The iPCa detection rate was 8% (23/299) and 19% (23/121) in cohort A vs. cohort B, respectively (p < .001). Virtual reduction of the number of tissue cassettes to ten cassettes resulted in a iPCa detection rate of 96% in both cohorts, missing one stage T1a/ISUP grade 1 carcinoma. Increasing the number of cassettes by two and eight cassettes, respectively, resulted in a detection rate of 100% in both cohorts without revealing high-grade carcinomas. Subgroup analyses in HoLEP patients confirmed these findings, demonstrated by a 100 vs. 96% iPCa detection rate following examination of the first ten cassettes, missing one case of T1a/ISUP 1. Examination of 8 additional cassettes resulted in a 100% detection rate. The extent of embedding of material obtained from transurethral prostate resection correlates with the iPCa detection rate. However, the submission of 10 cassettes appears to be a reasonable threshold to reduce resource utilization while maintaining secure cancer detection. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00428-022-03331-6. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-06-17 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9485088/ /pubmed/35710851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-022-03331-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Köllermann, Jens Hoeh, Benedikt Ruppel, Daniel Smith, Kevin Reis, Henning Wenzel, Mike Preisser, Felix Kosiba, Marina Mandel, Philipp Karakiewicz, Pierre I. Becker, Andreas Chun, Felix K. H. Wild, Peter Kluth, Luis A. The significance of the extent of tissue embedding for the detection of incidental prostate carcinoma on transurethral prostate resection material: the more, the better? |
title | The significance of the extent of tissue embedding for the detection of incidental prostate carcinoma on transurethral prostate resection material: the more, the better? |
title_full | The significance of the extent of tissue embedding for the detection of incidental prostate carcinoma on transurethral prostate resection material: the more, the better? |
title_fullStr | The significance of the extent of tissue embedding for the detection of incidental prostate carcinoma on transurethral prostate resection material: the more, the better? |
title_full_unstemmed | The significance of the extent of tissue embedding for the detection of incidental prostate carcinoma on transurethral prostate resection material: the more, the better? |
title_short | The significance of the extent of tissue embedding for the detection of incidental prostate carcinoma on transurethral prostate resection material: the more, the better? |
title_sort | significance of the extent of tissue embedding for the detection of incidental prostate carcinoma on transurethral prostate resection material: the more, the better? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9485088/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35710851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-022-03331-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kollermannjens thesignificanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter AT hoehbenedikt thesignificanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter AT ruppeldaniel thesignificanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter AT smithkevin thesignificanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter AT reishenning thesignificanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter AT wenzelmike thesignificanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter AT preisserfelix thesignificanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter AT kosibamarina thesignificanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter AT mandelphilipp thesignificanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter AT karakiewiczpierrei thesignificanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter AT beckerandreas thesignificanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter AT chunfelixkh thesignificanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter AT wildpeter thesignificanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter AT kluthluisa thesignificanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter AT kollermannjens significanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter AT hoehbenedikt significanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter AT ruppeldaniel significanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter AT smithkevin significanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter AT reishenning significanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter AT wenzelmike significanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter AT preisserfelix significanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter AT kosibamarina significanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter AT mandelphilipp significanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter AT karakiewiczpierrei significanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter AT beckerandreas significanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter AT chunfelixkh significanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter AT wildpeter significanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter AT kluthluisa significanceoftheextentoftissueembeddingforthedetectionofincidentalprostatecarcinomaontransurethralprostateresectionmaterialthemorethebetter |