Cargando…
Expert opinion on NSCLC small specimen biomarker testing — Part 1: Tissue collection and management
Biomarker testing is crucial for treatment selection in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the quantity of available tissue often presents a key constraint for patients with advanced disease, where minimally invasive tissue biopsy typically returns small samples. In Part 1 of this...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9485167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35857102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-022-03343-2 |
_version_ | 1784792031944507392 |
---|---|
author | Penault-Llorca, Frédérique Kerr, Keith M. Garrido, Pilar Thunnissen, Erik Dequeker, Elisabeth Normanno, Nicola Patton, Simon J. Fairley, Jenni Kapp, Joshua de Ridder, Daniëlle Ryška, Aleš Moch, Holger |
author_facet | Penault-Llorca, Frédérique Kerr, Keith M. Garrido, Pilar Thunnissen, Erik Dequeker, Elisabeth Normanno, Nicola Patton, Simon J. Fairley, Jenni Kapp, Joshua de Ridder, Daniëlle Ryška, Aleš Moch, Holger |
author_sort | Penault-Llorca, Frédérique |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biomarker testing is crucial for treatment selection in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the quantity of available tissue often presents a key constraint for patients with advanced disease, where minimally invasive tissue biopsy typically returns small samples. In Part 1 of this two-part series, we summarise evidence-based recommendations relating to small sample processing for patients with NSCLC. Generally, tissue biopsy techniques that deliver the greatest quantity and quality of tissue with the least risk to the patient should be selected. Rapid on-site evaluation can help to ensure sufficient sample quality and quantity. Sample processing should be managed according to biomarker testing requirements, because tissue fixation methodology influences downstream nucleic acid, protein and morphological analyses. Accordingly, 10% neutral buffered formalin is recommended as an appropriate fixative, and the duration of fixation is recommended not to exceed 24–48 h. Tissue sparing techniques, including the ‘one biopsy per block’ approach and small sample cutting protocols, can help preserve tissue. Cytological material (formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded [FFPE] cytology blocks and non-FFPE samples such as smears and touch preparations) can be an excellent source of nucleic acid, providing either primary or supplementary patient material to complete morphological and molecular diagnoses. Considerations on biomarker testing, reporting and quality assessment are discussed in Part 2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9485167 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94851672022-09-21 Expert opinion on NSCLC small specimen biomarker testing — Part 1: Tissue collection and management Penault-Llorca, Frédérique Kerr, Keith M. Garrido, Pilar Thunnissen, Erik Dequeker, Elisabeth Normanno, Nicola Patton, Simon J. Fairley, Jenni Kapp, Joshua de Ridder, Daniëlle Ryška, Aleš Moch, Holger Virchows Arch Review and Perspectives Biomarker testing is crucial for treatment selection in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the quantity of available tissue often presents a key constraint for patients with advanced disease, where minimally invasive tissue biopsy typically returns small samples. In Part 1 of this two-part series, we summarise evidence-based recommendations relating to small sample processing for patients with NSCLC. Generally, tissue biopsy techniques that deliver the greatest quantity and quality of tissue with the least risk to the patient should be selected. Rapid on-site evaluation can help to ensure sufficient sample quality and quantity. Sample processing should be managed according to biomarker testing requirements, because tissue fixation methodology influences downstream nucleic acid, protein and morphological analyses. Accordingly, 10% neutral buffered formalin is recommended as an appropriate fixative, and the duration of fixation is recommended not to exceed 24–48 h. Tissue sparing techniques, including the ‘one biopsy per block’ approach and small sample cutting protocols, can help preserve tissue. Cytological material (formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded [FFPE] cytology blocks and non-FFPE samples such as smears and touch preparations) can be an excellent source of nucleic acid, providing either primary or supplementary patient material to complete morphological and molecular diagnoses. Considerations on biomarker testing, reporting and quality assessment are discussed in Part 2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-07-20 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9485167/ /pubmed/35857102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-022-03343-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review and Perspectives Penault-Llorca, Frédérique Kerr, Keith M. Garrido, Pilar Thunnissen, Erik Dequeker, Elisabeth Normanno, Nicola Patton, Simon J. Fairley, Jenni Kapp, Joshua de Ridder, Daniëlle Ryška, Aleš Moch, Holger Expert opinion on NSCLC small specimen biomarker testing — Part 1: Tissue collection and management |
title | Expert opinion on NSCLC small specimen biomarker testing — Part 1: Tissue collection and management |
title_full | Expert opinion on NSCLC small specimen biomarker testing — Part 1: Tissue collection and management |
title_fullStr | Expert opinion on NSCLC small specimen biomarker testing — Part 1: Tissue collection and management |
title_full_unstemmed | Expert opinion on NSCLC small specimen biomarker testing — Part 1: Tissue collection and management |
title_short | Expert opinion on NSCLC small specimen biomarker testing — Part 1: Tissue collection and management |
title_sort | expert opinion on nsclc small specimen biomarker testing — part 1: tissue collection and management |
topic | Review and Perspectives |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9485167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35857102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-022-03343-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT penaultllorcafrederique expertopiniononnsclcsmallspecimenbiomarkertestingpart1tissuecollectionandmanagement AT kerrkeithm expertopiniononnsclcsmallspecimenbiomarkertestingpart1tissuecollectionandmanagement AT garridopilar expertopiniononnsclcsmallspecimenbiomarkertestingpart1tissuecollectionandmanagement AT thunnissenerik expertopiniononnsclcsmallspecimenbiomarkertestingpart1tissuecollectionandmanagement AT dequekerelisabeth expertopiniononnsclcsmallspecimenbiomarkertestingpart1tissuecollectionandmanagement AT normannonicola expertopiniononnsclcsmallspecimenbiomarkertestingpart1tissuecollectionandmanagement AT pattonsimonj expertopiniononnsclcsmallspecimenbiomarkertestingpart1tissuecollectionandmanagement AT fairleyjenni expertopiniononnsclcsmallspecimenbiomarkertestingpart1tissuecollectionandmanagement AT kappjoshua expertopiniononnsclcsmallspecimenbiomarkertestingpart1tissuecollectionandmanagement AT deridderdanielle expertopiniononnsclcsmallspecimenbiomarkertestingpart1tissuecollectionandmanagement AT ryskaales expertopiniononnsclcsmallspecimenbiomarkertestingpart1tissuecollectionandmanagement AT mochholger expertopiniononnsclcsmallspecimenbiomarkertestingpart1tissuecollectionandmanagement |