Cargando…

Expert opinion on NSCLC small specimen biomarker testing — Part 1: Tissue collection and management

Biomarker testing is crucial for treatment selection in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the quantity of available tissue often presents a key constraint for patients with advanced disease, where minimally invasive tissue biopsy typically returns small samples. In Part 1 of this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Penault-Llorca, Frédérique, Kerr, Keith M., Garrido, Pilar, Thunnissen, Erik, Dequeker, Elisabeth, Normanno, Nicola, Patton, Simon J., Fairley, Jenni, Kapp, Joshua, de Ridder, Daniëlle, Ryška, Aleš, Moch, Holger
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9485167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35857102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-022-03343-2
_version_ 1784792031944507392
author Penault-Llorca, Frédérique
Kerr, Keith M.
Garrido, Pilar
Thunnissen, Erik
Dequeker, Elisabeth
Normanno, Nicola
Patton, Simon J.
Fairley, Jenni
Kapp, Joshua
de Ridder, Daniëlle
Ryška, Aleš
Moch, Holger
author_facet Penault-Llorca, Frédérique
Kerr, Keith M.
Garrido, Pilar
Thunnissen, Erik
Dequeker, Elisabeth
Normanno, Nicola
Patton, Simon J.
Fairley, Jenni
Kapp, Joshua
de Ridder, Daniëlle
Ryška, Aleš
Moch, Holger
author_sort Penault-Llorca, Frédérique
collection PubMed
description Biomarker testing is crucial for treatment selection in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the quantity of available tissue often presents a key constraint for patients with advanced disease, where minimally invasive tissue biopsy typically returns small samples. In Part 1 of this two-part series, we summarise evidence-based recommendations relating to small sample processing for patients with NSCLC. Generally, tissue biopsy techniques that deliver the greatest quantity and quality of tissue with the least risk to the patient should be selected. Rapid on-site evaluation can help to ensure sufficient sample quality and quantity. Sample processing should be managed according to biomarker testing requirements, because tissue fixation methodology influences downstream nucleic acid, protein and morphological analyses. Accordingly, 10% neutral buffered formalin is recommended as an appropriate fixative, and the duration of fixation is recommended not to exceed 24–48 h. Tissue sparing techniques, including the ‘one biopsy per block’ approach and small sample cutting protocols, can help preserve tissue. Cytological material (formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded [FFPE] cytology blocks and non-FFPE samples such as smears and touch preparations) can be an excellent source of nucleic acid, providing either primary or supplementary patient material to complete morphological and molecular diagnoses. Considerations on biomarker testing, reporting and quality assessment are discussed in Part 2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9485167
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94851672022-09-21 Expert opinion on NSCLC small specimen biomarker testing — Part 1: Tissue collection and management Penault-Llorca, Frédérique Kerr, Keith M. Garrido, Pilar Thunnissen, Erik Dequeker, Elisabeth Normanno, Nicola Patton, Simon J. Fairley, Jenni Kapp, Joshua de Ridder, Daniëlle Ryška, Aleš Moch, Holger Virchows Arch Review and Perspectives Biomarker testing is crucial for treatment selection in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the quantity of available tissue often presents a key constraint for patients with advanced disease, where minimally invasive tissue biopsy typically returns small samples. In Part 1 of this two-part series, we summarise evidence-based recommendations relating to small sample processing for patients with NSCLC. Generally, tissue biopsy techniques that deliver the greatest quantity and quality of tissue with the least risk to the patient should be selected. Rapid on-site evaluation can help to ensure sufficient sample quality and quantity. Sample processing should be managed according to biomarker testing requirements, because tissue fixation methodology influences downstream nucleic acid, protein and morphological analyses. Accordingly, 10% neutral buffered formalin is recommended as an appropriate fixative, and the duration of fixation is recommended not to exceed 24–48 h. Tissue sparing techniques, including the ‘one biopsy per block’ approach and small sample cutting protocols, can help preserve tissue. Cytological material (formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded [FFPE] cytology blocks and non-FFPE samples such as smears and touch preparations) can be an excellent source of nucleic acid, providing either primary or supplementary patient material to complete morphological and molecular diagnoses. Considerations on biomarker testing, reporting and quality assessment are discussed in Part 2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-07-20 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9485167/ /pubmed/35857102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-022-03343-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review and Perspectives
Penault-Llorca, Frédérique
Kerr, Keith M.
Garrido, Pilar
Thunnissen, Erik
Dequeker, Elisabeth
Normanno, Nicola
Patton, Simon J.
Fairley, Jenni
Kapp, Joshua
de Ridder, Daniëlle
Ryška, Aleš
Moch, Holger
Expert opinion on NSCLC small specimen biomarker testing — Part 1: Tissue collection and management
title Expert opinion on NSCLC small specimen biomarker testing — Part 1: Tissue collection and management
title_full Expert opinion on NSCLC small specimen biomarker testing — Part 1: Tissue collection and management
title_fullStr Expert opinion on NSCLC small specimen biomarker testing — Part 1: Tissue collection and management
title_full_unstemmed Expert opinion on NSCLC small specimen biomarker testing — Part 1: Tissue collection and management
title_short Expert opinion on NSCLC small specimen biomarker testing — Part 1: Tissue collection and management
title_sort expert opinion on nsclc small specimen biomarker testing — part 1: tissue collection and management
topic Review and Perspectives
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9485167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35857102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-022-03343-2
work_keys_str_mv AT penaultllorcafrederique expertopiniononnsclcsmallspecimenbiomarkertestingpart1tissuecollectionandmanagement
AT kerrkeithm expertopiniononnsclcsmallspecimenbiomarkertestingpart1tissuecollectionandmanagement
AT garridopilar expertopiniononnsclcsmallspecimenbiomarkertestingpart1tissuecollectionandmanagement
AT thunnissenerik expertopiniononnsclcsmallspecimenbiomarkertestingpart1tissuecollectionandmanagement
AT dequekerelisabeth expertopiniononnsclcsmallspecimenbiomarkertestingpart1tissuecollectionandmanagement
AT normannonicola expertopiniononnsclcsmallspecimenbiomarkertestingpart1tissuecollectionandmanagement
AT pattonsimonj expertopiniononnsclcsmallspecimenbiomarkertestingpart1tissuecollectionandmanagement
AT fairleyjenni expertopiniononnsclcsmallspecimenbiomarkertestingpart1tissuecollectionandmanagement
AT kappjoshua expertopiniononnsclcsmallspecimenbiomarkertestingpart1tissuecollectionandmanagement
AT deridderdanielle expertopiniononnsclcsmallspecimenbiomarkertestingpart1tissuecollectionandmanagement
AT ryskaales expertopiniononnsclcsmallspecimenbiomarkertestingpart1tissuecollectionandmanagement
AT mochholger expertopiniononnsclcsmallspecimenbiomarkertestingpart1tissuecollectionandmanagement