Cargando…
Examination of a foot mounted IMU-based methodology for a running gait assessment
Gait assessment is essential to understand injury prevention mechanisms during running, where high-impact forces can lead to a range of injuries in the lower extremities. Information regarding the running style to increase efficiency and/or selection of the correct running equipment, such as shoe ty...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9485551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36147582 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.956889 |
_version_ | 1784792093869211648 |
---|---|
author | Young, Fraser Mason, Rachel Wall, Conor Morris, Rosie Stuart, Samuel Godfrey, Alan |
author_facet | Young, Fraser Mason, Rachel Wall, Conor Morris, Rosie Stuart, Samuel Godfrey, Alan |
author_sort | Young, Fraser |
collection | PubMed |
description | Gait assessment is essential to understand injury prevention mechanisms during running, where high-impact forces can lead to a range of injuries in the lower extremities. Information regarding the running style to increase efficiency and/or selection of the correct running equipment, such as shoe type, can minimize the risk of injury, e.g., matching a runner's gait to a particular set of cushioning technologies found in modern shoes (neutral/support cushioning). Awareness of training or selection of the correct equipment requires an understanding of a runner's biomechanics, such as determining foot orientation when it strikes the ground. Previous work involved a low-cost approach with a foot-mounted inertial measurement unit (IMU) and an associated zero-crossing-based methodology to objectively understand a runner's biomechanics (in any setting) to learn about shoe selection. Here, an investigation of the previously presented ZC-based methodology is presented only to determine general validity for running gait assessment in a range of running abilities from novice (8 km/h) to experienced (16 km/h+). In comparison to Vicon 3D motion tracking data, the presented approach can extract pronation, foot strike location, and ground contact time with good [ICC((2,1)) > 0.750] to excellent [ICC((2,1)) > 0.900] agreement between 8–12 km/h runs. However, at higher speeds (14 km/h+), the ZC-based approach begins to deteriorate in performance, suggesting that other features and approaches may be more suitable for faster running and sprinting tasks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9485551 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94855512022-09-21 Examination of a foot mounted IMU-based methodology for a running gait assessment Young, Fraser Mason, Rachel Wall, Conor Morris, Rosie Stuart, Samuel Godfrey, Alan Front Sports Act Living Sports and Active Living Gait assessment is essential to understand injury prevention mechanisms during running, where high-impact forces can lead to a range of injuries in the lower extremities. Information regarding the running style to increase efficiency and/or selection of the correct running equipment, such as shoe type, can minimize the risk of injury, e.g., matching a runner's gait to a particular set of cushioning technologies found in modern shoes (neutral/support cushioning). Awareness of training or selection of the correct equipment requires an understanding of a runner's biomechanics, such as determining foot orientation when it strikes the ground. Previous work involved a low-cost approach with a foot-mounted inertial measurement unit (IMU) and an associated zero-crossing-based methodology to objectively understand a runner's biomechanics (in any setting) to learn about shoe selection. Here, an investigation of the previously presented ZC-based methodology is presented only to determine general validity for running gait assessment in a range of running abilities from novice (8 km/h) to experienced (16 km/h+). In comparison to Vicon 3D motion tracking data, the presented approach can extract pronation, foot strike location, and ground contact time with good [ICC((2,1)) > 0.750] to excellent [ICC((2,1)) > 0.900] agreement between 8–12 km/h runs. However, at higher speeds (14 km/h+), the ZC-based approach begins to deteriorate in performance, suggesting that other features and approaches may be more suitable for faster running and sprinting tasks. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9485551/ /pubmed/36147582 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.956889 Text en Copyright © 2022 Young, Mason, Wall, Morris, Stuart and Godfrey. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Sports and Active Living Young, Fraser Mason, Rachel Wall, Conor Morris, Rosie Stuart, Samuel Godfrey, Alan Examination of a foot mounted IMU-based methodology for a running gait assessment |
title | Examination of a foot mounted IMU-based methodology for a running gait assessment |
title_full | Examination of a foot mounted IMU-based methodology for a running gait assessment |
title_fullStr | Examination of a foot mounted IMU-based methodology for a running gait assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Examination of a foot mounted IMU-based methodology for a running gait assessment |
title_short | Examination of a foot mounted IMU-based methodology for a running gait assessment |
title_sort | examination of a foot mounted imu-based methodology for a running gait assessment |
topic | Sports and Active Living |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9485551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36147582 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.956889 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT youngfraser examinationofafootmountedimubasedmethodologyforarunninggaitassessment AT masonrachel examinationofafootmountedimubasedmethodologyforarunninggaitassessment AT wallconor examinationofafootmountedimubasedmethodologyforarunninggaitassessment AT morrisrosie examinationofafootmountedimubasedmethodologyforarunninggaitassessment AT stuartsamuel examinationofafootmountedimubasedmethodologyforarunninggaitassessment AT godfreyalan examinationofafootmountedimubasedmethodologyforarunninggaitassessment |