Cargando…

Clinical evaluation of the Multimapping technique for simultaneous myocardial T(1) and T(2) mapping

The Multimapping technique was recently proposed for simultaneous myocardial T(1) and T(2) mapping. In this study, we evaluate its correlation with clinical reference mapping techniques in patients with a range of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and compare image quality and inter- and intra-observer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jarkman, Charlotta, Carlhäll, Carl-Johan, Henningsson, Markus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9485633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36148079
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.960403
_version_ 1784792115534888960
author Jarkman, Charlotta
Carlhäll, Carl-Johan
Henningsson, Markus
author_facet Jarkman, Charlotta
Carlhäll, Carl-Johan
Henningsson, Markus
author_sort Jarkman, Charlotta
collection PubMed
description The Multimapping technique was recently proposed for simultaneous myocardial T(1) and T(2) mapping. In this study, we evaluate its correlation with clinical reference mapping techniques in patients with a range of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and compare image quality and inter- and intra-observer repeatability. Multimapping consists of an ECG-triggered, 2D single-shot bSSFP readout with inversion recovery and T(2) preparation modules, acquired across 10 cardiac cycles. The sequence was implemented at 1.5T and compared to clinical reference mapping techniques, modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) and T(2) prepared bSSFP with four echo times (T(2)bSSFP), and compared in 47 patients with CVD (of which 44 were analyzed). In diseased myocardial segments (defined as the presence of late gadolinium enhancement), there was a high correlation between Multimapping and MOLLI for native myocardium T(1) (r(2) = 0.73), ECV (r(2) = 0.91), and blood T(1) (r(2) = 0.88), and Multimapping and T(2)bSSFP for native myocardial T(2) (r(2) = 0.80). In healthy myocardial segments, a bias for native T(1) (Multimapping = 1,116 ± 21 ms, MOLLI = 1,002 ± 21, P < 0.001), post-contrast T(1) (Multimapping = 479 ± 31 ms, MOLLI = 426 ± 27 ms, 0.001), ECV (Multimapping = 21.5 ± 1.9%, MOLLI = 23.7 ± 2.3%, P = 0.001), and native T(2) (Multimapping = 48.0 ± 3.0 ms, T(2)bSSFP = 53.9 ± 3.5 ms, P < 0.001) was observed. The image quality for Multimapping was scored as higher for all mapping techniques (native T(1), post-contrast T(1), ECV, and T(2)bSSFP) compared to the clinical reference techniques. The inter- and intra-observer agreements were excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC > 0.9) for most measurements, except for inter-observer repeatability of Multimapping native T(1) (ICC = 0.87), post-contrast T(1) (ICC = 0.73), and T(2)bSSFP native T(2) (ICC = 0.88). Multimapping shows high correlations with clinical reference mapping techniques for T(1), T(2), and ECV in a diverse cohort of patients with different cardiovascular diseases. Multimapping enables simultaneous T(1) and T(2) mapping and can be performed in a short breath-hold, with image quality superior to that of the clinical reference techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9485633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94856332022-09-21 Clinical evaluation of the Multimapping technique for simultaneous myocardial T(1) and T(2) mapping Jarkman, Charlotta Carlhäll, Carl-Johan Henningsson, Markus Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine The Multimapping technique was recently proposed for simultaneous myocardial T(1) and T(2) mapping. In this study, we evaluate its correlation with clinical reference mapping techniques in patients with a range of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and compare image quality and inter- and intra-observer repeatability. Multimapping consists of an ECG-triggered, 2D single-shot bSSFP readout with inversion recovery and T(2) preparation modules, acquired across 10 cardiac cycles. The sequence was implemented at 1.5T and compared to clinical reference mapping techniques, modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) and T(2) prepared bSSFP with four echo times (T(2)bSSFP), and compared in 47 patients with CVD (of which 44 were analyzed). In diseased myocardial segments (defined as the presence of late gadolinium enhancement), there was a high correlation between Multimapping and MOLLI for native myocardium T(1) (r(2) = 0.73), ECV (r(2) = 0.91), and blood T(1) (r(2) = 0.88), and Multimapping and T(2)bSSFP for native myocardial T(2) (r(2) = 0.80). In healthy myocardial segments, a bias for native T(1) (Multimapping = 1,116 ± 21 ms, MOLLI = 1,002 ± 21, P < 0.001), post-contrast T(1) (Multimapping = 479 ± 31 ms, MOLLI = 426 ± 27 ms, 0.001), ECV (Multimapping = 21.5 ± 1.9%, MOLLI = 23.7 ± 2.3%, P = 0.001), and native T(2) (Multimapping = 48.0 ± 3.0 ms, T(2)bSSFP = 53.9 ± 3.5 ms, P < 0.001) was observed. The image quality for Multimapping was scored as higher for all mapping techniques (native T(1), post-contrast T(1), ECV, and T(2)bSSFP) compared to the clinical reference techniques. The inter- and intra-observer agreements were excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC > 0.9) for most measurements, except for inter-observer repeatability of Multimapping native T(1) (ICC = 0.87), post-contrast T(1) (ICC = 0.73), and T(2)bSSFP native T(2) (ICC = 0.88). Multimapping shows high correlations with clinical reference mapping techniques for T(1), T(2), and ECV in a diverse cohort of patients with different cardiovascular diseases. Multimapping enables simultaneous T(1) and T(2) mapping and can be performed in a short breath-hold, with image quality superior to that of the clinical reference techniques. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9485633/ /pubmed/36148079 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.960403 Text en Copyright © 2022 Jarkman, Carlhäll and Henningsson. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Jarkman, Charlotta
Carlhäll, Carl-Johan
Henningsson, Markus
Clinical evaluation of the Multimapping technique for simultaneous myocardial T(1) and T(2) mapping
title Clinical evaluation of the Multimapping technique for simultaneous myocardial T(1) and T(2) mapping
title_full Clinical evaluation of the Multimapping technique for simultaneous myocardial T(1) and T(2) mapping
title_fullStr Clinical evaluation of the Multimapping technique for simultaneous myocardial T(1) and T(2) mapping
title_full_unstemmed Clinical evaluation of the Multimapping technique for simultaneous myocardial T(1) and T(2) mapping
title_short Clinical evaluation of the Multimapping technique for simultaneous myocardial T(1) and T(2) mapping
title_sort clinical evaluation of the multimapping technique for simultaneous myocardial t(1) and t(2) mapping
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9485633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36148079
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.960403
work_keys_str_mv AT jarkmancharlotta clinicalevaluationofthemultimappingtechniqueforsimultaneousmyocardialt1andt2mapping
AT carlhallcarljohan clinicalevaluationofthemultimappingtechniqueforsimultaneousmyocardialt1andt2mapping
AT henningssonmarkus clinicalevaluationofthemultimappingtechniqueforsimultaneousmyocardialt1andt2mapping