Cargando…
50 Shades of ‘Groundhog Day’
INTRODUCTION: The 2017 European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) guidelines on carotid and vertebral artery disease concluded that the evidence did not support a role for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) in preventi...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9485896/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36147705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2022.08.001 |
_version_ | 1784792160614219776 |
---|---|
author | Naylor, A. Ross |
author_facet | Naylor, A. Ross |
author_sort | Naylor, A. Ross |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The 2017 European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) guidelines on carotid and vertebral artery disease concluded that the evidence did not support a role for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) in preventing cognitive impairment or dementia. What new data have emerged since 2017, and have they influenced the 2023 ESVS guidelines? REPORT: In a systematic review, 33/35 studies (94%) reported a “significant association” between ACS and cognitive impairment; 20 studies had 1–3 tests with significant cognitive impairment; 10 reported 4–6 tests with cognitive impairment; and three studies reported ≥7 tests with significant cognitive impairment. Baseline data from 1 000 patients with ACS in the second Carotid Revascularisation Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST-2) reported that the overall Z score for cognition in patients with ACS was significantly lower than expected, especially for word list recall and word list learning. Another systematic review reported that (in the long term) 69% of patients with ACS undergoing CEA/CAS had no change in cognitive function. However, in another 25%, cognitive scores/domains were mostly unchanged, but 1–2 individual tests were significantly improved. In addition, 1 601 UK and Swedish patients with ACS were randomised in the first Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST-1) to CEA or best medical therapy (BMT). There was no difference in 10 year rates of dementia (CEA 6.7% vs. 6.6% with BMT) or at 20 years (14.3% [CEA] vs. 15.5% [BMT]), suggesting that CEA did not prevent dementia vs. BMT (hazard ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.75–1.28; p = .89). DISCUSSION: ACS is associated with significant cognitive impairment, but whether this supports a direct aetiological role, or a marker for something else, remains unknown. There is no evidence that CEA/CAS prevents late dementia. The 2023 ESVS guidelines have not changed its recommendation compared with the 2017 version. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9485896 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94858962022-09-21 50 Shades of ‘Groundhog Day’ Naylor, A. Ross EJVES Vasc Forum Review INTRODUCTION: The 2017 European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) guidelines on carotid and vertebral artery disease concluded that the evidence did not support a role for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) in preventing cognitive impairment or dementia. What new data have emerged since 2017, and have they influenced the 2023 ESVS guidelines? REPORT: In a systematic review, 33/35 studies (94%) reported a “significant association” between ACS and cognitive impairment; 20 studies had 1–3 tests with significant cognitive impairment; 10 reported 4–6 tests with cognitive impairment; and three studies reported ≥7 tests with significant cognitive impairment. Baseline data from 1 000 patients with ACS in the second Carotid Revascularisation Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST-2) reported that the overall Z score for cognition in patients with ACS was significantly lower than expected, especially for word list recall and word list learning. Another systematic review reported that (in the long term) 69% of patients with ACS undergoing CEA/CAS had no change in cognitive function. However, in another 25%, cognitive scores/domains were mostly unchanged, but 1–2 individual tests were significantly improved. In addition, 1 601 UK and Swedish patients with ACS were randomised in the first Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST-1) to CEA or best medical therapy (BMT). There was no difference in 10 year rates of dementia (CEA 6.7% vs. 6.6% with BMT) or at 20 years (14.3% [CEA] vs. 15.5% [BMT]), suggesting that CEA did not prevent dementia vs. BMT (hazard ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.75–1.28; p = .89). DISCUSSION: ACS is associated with significant cognitive impairment, but whether this supports a direct aetiological role, or a marker for something else, remains unknown. There is no evidence that CEA/CAS prevents late dementia. The 2023 ESVS guidelines have not changed its recommendation compared with the 2017 version. Elsevier 2022-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9485896/ /pubmed/36147705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2022.08.001 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Naylor, A. Ross 50 Shades of ‘Groundhog Day’ |
title | 50 Shades of ‘Groundhog Day’ |
title_full | 50 Shades of ‘Groundhog Day’ |
title_fullStr | 50 Shades of ‘Groundhog Day’ |
title_full_unstemmed | 50 Shades of ‘Groundhog Day’ |
title_short | 50 Shades of ‘Groundhog Day’ |
title_sort | 50 shades of ‘groundhog day’ |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9485896/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36147705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2022.08.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nayloraross 50shadesofgroundhogday |