Cargando…
Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of Leukocyte-Rich Platelet-Rich Fibrin with Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Management of Gingival Recession Defects: A Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND: The aim of this research was to determine and compare the clinical efficacy of leukocyte platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) and advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) in combination with coronally advanced flap (CAF) in the treatment of gingival recession defects. METHODS: Systemically healthy...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
S. Karger AG
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9485915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35728577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000525560 |
_version_ | 1784792164801183744 |
---|---|
author | Tadepalli, Anupama Chekurthi, Swapna Kavassery Balasubramanian, Swarupa Parthasarathy, Harinath Ponnaiyan, Deepa |
author_facet | Tadepalli, Anupama Chekurthi, Swapna Kavassery Balasubramanian, Swarupa Parthasarathy, Harinath Ponnaiyan, Deepa |
author_sort | Tadepalli, Anupama |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this research was to determine and compare the clinical efficacy of leukocyte platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) and advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) in combination with coronally advanced flap (CAF) in the treatment of gingival recession defects. METHODS: Systemically healthy subjects presenting with 30 Miller's class I or II gingival recession defects in maxillary anteriors and premolars, were treated with either CAF + L-PRF or CAF + A-PRF. Clinical parameters such as recession height (RH), width, probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level (CAL), keratinized tissue height (KTH), and width of attached gingiva (WAG) were measured at baseline, 3, and 6 months. Gingival biotype was evaluated at baseline and 6 months post-surgery. Mean root coverage percentage (MRC%) was evaluated at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: Statistically significant reduction in mean RH was observed from baseline (2.53 ± 0.74 mm, 2.63 ± 0.82 mm) to 6 months (0.87 ± 0.83 mm, 0.53 ± 0.91 mm) in CAF + L-PRF and CAF + A-PRF groups, respectively. The MRC% achieved at 6 months was 67.20 ± 32.81 in the CAF + L-PRF group and 81.66 ± 28.21 in the CAF + A-PRF group. Statistically significant gain in CAL, WAG, and KTH was observed in both therapeutic groups (p < 0.05). Intergroup analysis revealed no statistically significant differences among study parameters between groups at any time point (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of this study, both L-PRF and A-PRF may be suggested as viable treatment options for the management of gingival recession in maxilla. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9485915 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | S. Karger AG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94859152022-09-23 Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of Leukocyte-Rich Platelet-Rich Fibrin with Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Management of Gingival Recession Defects: A Randomized Controlled Trial Tadepalli, Anupama Chekurthi, Swapna Kavassery Balasubramanian, Swarupa Parthasarathy, Harinath Ponnaiyan, Deepa Med Princ Pract Original Paper BACKGROUND: The aim of this research was to determine and compare the clinical efficacy of leukocyte platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) and advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) in combination with coronally advanced flap (CAF) in the treatment of gingival recession defects. METHODS: Systemically healthy subjects presenting with 30 Miller's class I or II gingival recession defects in maxillary anteriors and premolars, were treated with either CAF + L-PRF or CAF + A-PRF. Clinical parameters such as recession height (RH), width, probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level (CAL), keratinized tissue height (KTH), and width of attached gingiva (WAG) were measured at baseline, 3, and 6 months. Gingival biotype was evaluated at baseline and 6 months post-surgery. Mean root coverage percentage (MRC%) was evaluated at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: Statistically significant reduction in mean RH was observed from baseline (2.53 ± 0.74 mm, 2.63 ± 0.82 mm) to 6 months (0.87 ± 0.83 mm, 0.53 ± 0.91 mm) in CAF + L-PRF and CAF + A-PRF groups, respectively. The MRC% achieved at 6 months was 67.20 ± 32.81 in the CAF + L-PRF group and 81.66 ± 28.21 in the CAF + A-PRF group. Statistically significant gain in CAL, WAG, and KTH was observed in both therapeutic groups (p < 0.05). Intergroup analysis revealed no statistically significant differences among study parameters between groups at any time point (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of this study, both L-PRF and A-PRF may be suggested as viable treatment options for the management of gingival recession in maxilla. S. Karger AG 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9485915/ /pubmed/35728577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000525560 Text en Copyright © 2022 by The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Tadepalli, Anupama Chekurthi, Swapna Kavassery Balasubramanian, Swarupa Parthasarathy, Harinath Ponnaiyan, Deepa Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of Leukocyte-Rich Platelet-Rich Fibrin with Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Management of Gingival Recession Defects: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of Leukocyte-Rich Platelet-Rich Fibrin with Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Management of Gingival Recession Defects: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of Leukocyte-Rich Platelet-Rich Fibrin with Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Management of Gingival Recession Defects: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of Leukocyte-Rich Platelet-Rich Fibrin with Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Management of Gingival Recession Defects: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of Leukocyte-Rich Platelet-Rich Fibrin with Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Management of Gingival Recession Defects: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of Leukocyte-Rich Platelet-Rich Fibrin with Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Management of Gingival Recession Defects: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of clinical efficacy of leukocyte-rich platelet-rich fibrin with advanced platelet-rich fibrin in management of gingival recession defects: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9485915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35728577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000525560 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tadepallianupama comparativeevaluationofclinicalefficacyofleukocyterichplateletrichfibrinwithadvancedplateletrichfibrininmanagementofgingivalrecessiondefectsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chekurthiswapna comparativeevaluationofclinicalefficacyofleukocyterichplateletrichfibrinwithadvancedplateletrichfibrininmanagementofgingivalrecessiondefectsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kavasserybalasubramanianswarupa comparativeevaluationofclinicalefficacyofleukocyterichplateletrichfibrinwithadvancedplateletrichfibrininmanagementofgingivalrecessiondefectsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT parthasarathyharinath comparativeevaluationofclinicalefficacyofleukocyterichplateletrichfibrinwithadvancedplateletrichfibrininmanagementofgingivalrecessiondefectsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ponnaiyandeepa comparativeevaluationofclinicalefficacyofleukocyterichplateletrichfibrinwithadvancedplateletrichfibrininmanagementofgingivalrecessiondefectsarandomizedcontrolledtrial |