Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of Leukocyte-Rich Platelet-Rich Fibrin with Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Management of Gingival Recession Defects: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: The aim of this research was to determine and compare the clinical efficacy of leukocyte platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) and advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) in combination with coronally advanced flap (CAF) in the treatment of gingival recession defects. METHODS: Systemically healthy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tadepalli, Anupama, Chekurthi, Swapna, Kavassery Balasubramanian, Swarupa, Parthasarathy, Harinath, Ponnaiyan, Deepa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9485915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35728577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000525560
_version_ 1784792164801183744
author Tadepalli, Anupama
Chekurthi, Swapna
Kavassery Balasubramanian, Swarupa
Parthasarathy, Harinath
Ponnaiyan, Deepa
author_facet Tadepalli, Anupama
Chekurthi, Swapna
Kavassery Balasubramanian, Swarupa
Parthasarathy, Harinath
Ponnaiyan, Deepa
author_sort Tadepalli, Anupama
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this research was to determine and compare the clinical efficacy of leukocyte platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) and advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) in combination with coronally advanced flap (CAF) in the treatment of gingival recession defects. METHODS: Systemically healthy subjects presenting with 30 Miller's class I or II gingival recession defects in maxillary anteriors and premolars, were treated with either CAF + L-PRF or CAF + A-PRF. Clinical parameters such as recession height (RH), width, probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level (CAL), keratinized tissue height (KTH), and width of attached gingiva (WAG) were measured at baseline, 3, and 6 months. Gingival biotype was evaluated at baseline and 6 months post-surgery. Mean root coverage percentage (MRC%) was evaluated at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: Statistically significant reduction in mean RH was observed from baseline (2.53 ± 0.74 mm, 2.63 ± 0.82 mm) to 6 months (0.87 ± 0.83 mm, 0.53 ± 0.91 mm) in CAF + L-PRF and CAF + A-PRF groups, respectively. The MRC% achieved at 6 months was 67.20 ± 32.81 in the CAF + L-PRF group and 81.66 ± 28.21 in the CAF + A-PRF group. Statistically significant gain in CAL, WAG, and KTH was observed in both therapeutic groups (p < 0.05). Intergroup analysis revealed no statistically significant differences among study parameters between groups at any time point (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of this study, both L-PRF and A-PRF may be suggested as viable treatment options for the management of gingival recession in maxilla.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9485915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94859152022-09-23 Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of Leukocyte-Rich Platelet-Rich Fibrin with Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Management of Gingival Recession Defects: A Randomized Controlled Trial Tadepalli, Anupama Chekurthi, Swapna Kavassery Balasubramanian, Swarupa Parthasarathy, Harinath Ponnaiyan, Deepa Med Princ Pract Original Paper BACKGROUND: The aim of this research was to determine and compare the clinical efficacy of leukocyte platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) and advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) in combination with coronally advanced flap (CAF) in the treatment of gingival recession defects. METHODS: Systemically healthy subjects presenting with 30 Miller's class I or II gingival recession defects in maxillary anteriors and premolars, were treated with either CAF + L-PRF or CAF + A-PRF. Clinical parameters such as recession height (RH), width, probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level (CAL), keratinized tissue height (KTH), and width of attached gingiva (WAG) were measured at baseline, 3, and 6 months. Gingival biotype was evaluated at baseline and 6 months post-surgery. Mean root coverage percentage (MRC%) was evaluated at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: Statistically significant reduction in mean RH was observed from baseline (2.53 ± 0.74 mm, 2.63 ± 0.82 mm) to 6 months (0.87 ± 0.83 mm, 0.53 ± 0.91 mm) in CAF + L-PRF and CAF + A-PRF groups, respectively. The MRC% achieved at 6 months was 67.20 ± 32.81 in the CAF + L-PRF group and 81.66 ± 28.21 in the CAF + A-PRF group. Statistically significant gain in CAL, WAG, and KTH was observed in both therapeutic groups (p < 0.05). Intergroup analysis revealed no statistically significant differences among study parameters between groups at any time point (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of this study, both L-PRF and A-PRF may be suggested as viable treatment options for the management of gingival recession in maxilla. S. Karger AG 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9485915/ /pubmed/35728577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000525560 Text en Copyright © 2022 by The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Tadepalli, Anupama
Chekurthi, Swapna
Kavassery Balasubramanian, Swarupa
Parthasarathy, Harinath
Ponnaiyan, Deepa
Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of Leukocyte-Rich Platelet-Rich Fibrin with Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Management of Gingival Recession Defects: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of Leukocyte-Rich Platelet-Rich Fibrin with Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Management of Gingival Recession Defects: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of Leukocyte-Rich Platelet-Rich Fibrin with Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Management of Gingival Recession Defects: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of Leukocyte-Rich Platelet-Rich Fibrin with Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Management of Gingival Recession Defects: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of Leukocyte-Rich Platelet-Rich Fibrin with Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Management of Gingival Recession Defects: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of Leukocyte-Rich Platelet-Rich Fibrin with Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Management of Gingival Recession Defects: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort comparative evaluation of clinical efficacy of leukocyte-rich platelet-rich fibrin with advanced platelet-rich fibrin in management of gingival recession defects: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9485915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35728577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000525560
work_keys_str_mv AT tadepallianupama comparativeevaluationofclinicalefficacyofleukocyterichplateletrichfibrinwithadvancedplateletrichfibrininmanagementofgingivalrecessiondefectsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chekurthiswapna comparativeevaluationofclinicalefficacyofleukocyterichplateletrichfibrinwithadvancedplateletrichfibrininmanagementofgingivalrecessiondefectsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kavasserybalasubramanianswarupa comparativeevaluationofclinicalefficacyofleukocyterichplateletrichfibrinwithadvancedplateletrichfibrininmanagementofgingivalrecessiondefectsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT parthasarathyharinath comparativeevaluationofclinicalefficacyofleukocyterichplateletrichfibrinwithadvancedplateletrichfibrininmanagementofgingivalrecessiondefectsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ponnaiyandeepa comparativeevaluationofclinicalefficacyofleukocyterichplateletrichfibrinwithadvancedplateletrichfibrininmanagementofgingivalrecessiondefectsarandomizedcontrolledtrial