Cargando…

Artificial intelligence performance in image-based ovarian cancer identification: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Accurate identification of ovarian cancer (OC) is of paramount importance in clinical treatment success. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a potentially reliable assistant for the medical imaging recognition. We systematically review articles on the diagnostic performance of AI in OC from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, He-Li, Gong, Ting-Ting, Liu, Fang-Hua, Chen, Hong-Yu, Xiao, Qian, Hou, Yang, Huang, Ying, Sun, Hong-Zan, Shi, Yu, Gao, Song, Lou, Yan, Chang, Qing, Zhao, Yu-Hong, Gao, Qing-Lei, Wu, Qi-Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9486055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36147628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101662
_version_ 1784792192899874816
author Xu, He-Li
Gong, Ting-Ting
Liu, Fang-Hua
Chen, Hong-Yu
Xiao, Qian
Hou, Yang
Huang, Ying
Sun, Hong-Zan
Shi, Yu
Gao, Song
Lou, Yan
Chang, Qing
Zhao, Yu-Hong
Gao, Qing-Lei
Wu, Qi-Jun
author_facet Xu, He-Li
Gong, Ting-Ting
Liu, Fang-Hua
Chen, Hong-Yu
Xiao, Qian
Hou, Yang
Huang, Ying
Sun, Hong-Zan
Shi, Yu
Gao, Song
Lou, Yan
Chang, Qing
Zhao, Yu-Hong
Gao, Qing-Lei
Wu, Qi-Jun
author_sort Xu, He-Li
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accurate identification of ovarian cancer (OC) is of paramount importance in clinical treatment success. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a potentially reliable assistant for the medical imaging recognition. We systematically review articles on the diagnostic performance of AI in OC from medical imaging for the first time. METHODS: The Medline, Embase, IEEE, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library databases were searched for related studies published until August 1, 2022. Inclusion criteria were studies that developed or used AI algorithms in the diagnosis of OC from medical images. The binary diagnostic accuracy data were extracted to derive the outcomes of interest: sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), and Area Under the Curve (AUC). The study was registered with the PROSPERO, CRD42022324611. FINDINGS: Thirty-four eligible studies were identified, of which twenty-eight studies were included in the meta-analysis with a pooled SE of 88% (95%CI: 85–90%), SP of 85% (82–88%), and AUC of 0.93 (0.91–0.95). Analysis for different algorithms revealed a pooled SE of 89% (85–92%) and SP of 88% (82–92%) for machine learning; and a pooled SE of 88% (84–91%) and SP of 84% (80–87%) for deep learning. Acceptable diagnostic performance was demonstrated in subgroup analyses stratified by imaging modalities (Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, or Computed Tomography), sample size (≤300 or >300), AI algorithms versus clinicians, year of publication (before or after 2020), geographical distribution (Asia or non Asia), and the different risk of bias levels (≥3 domain low risk or < 3 domain low risk). INTERPRETATION: AI algorithms exhibited favorable performance for the diagnosis of OC through medical imaging. More rigorous reporting standards that address specific challenges of AI research could improve future studies. FUNDING: This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82073647 to Q-JW and No. 82103914 to T-TG), LiaoNing Revitalization Talents Program (No. XLYC1907102 to Q-JW), and 345 Talent Project of Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University (No. M0268 to Q-JW and No. M0952 to T-TG).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9486055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94860552022-09-21 Artificial intelligence performance in image-based ovarian cancer identification: A systematic review and meta-analysis Xu, He-Li Gong, Ting-Ting Liu, Fang-Hua Chen, Hong-Yu Xiao, Qian Hou, Yang Huang, Ying Sun, Hong-Zan Shi, Yu Gao, Song Lou, Yan Chang, Qing Zhao, Yu-Hong Gao, Qing-Lei Wu, Qi-Jun eClinicalMedicine Articles BACKGROUND: Accurate identification of ovarian cancer (OC) is of paramount importance in clinical treatment success. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a potentially reliable assistant for the medical imaging recognition. We systematically review articles on the diagnostic performance of AI in OC from medical imaging for the first time. METHODS: The Medline, Embase, IEEE, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library databases were searched for related studies published until August 1, 2022. Inclusion criteria were studies that developed or used AI algorithms in the diagnosis of OC from medical images. The binary diagnostic accuracy data were extracted to derive the outcomes of interest: sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), and Area Under the Curve (AUC). The study was registered with the PROSPERO, CRD42022324611. FINDINGS: Thirty-four eligible studies were identified, of which twenty-eight studies were included in the meta-analysis with a pooled SE of 88% (95%CI: 85–90%), SP of 85% (82–88%), and AUC of 0.93 (0.91–0.95). Analysis for different algorithms revealed a pooled SE of 89% (85–92%) and SP of 88% (82–92%) for machine learning; and a pooled SE of 88% (84–91%) and SP of 84% (80–87%) for deep learning. Acceptable diagnostic performance was demonstrated in subgroup analyses stratified by imaging modalities (Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, or Computed Tomography), sample size (≤300 or >300), AI algorithms versus clinicians, year of publication (before or after 2020), geographical distribution (Asia or non Asia), and the different risk of bias levels (≥3 domain low risk or < 3 domain low risk). INTERPRETATION: AI algorithms exhibited favorable performance for the diagnosis of OC through medical imaging. More rigorous reporting standards that address specific challenges of AI research could improve future studies. FUNDING: This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82073647 to Q-JW and No. 82103914 to T-TG), LiaoNing Revitalization Talents Program (No. XLYC1907102 to Q-JW), and 345 Talent Project of Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University (No. M0268 to Q-JW and No. M0952 to T-TG). Elsevier 2022-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9486055/ /pubmed/36147628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101662 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Xu, He-Li
Gong, Ting-Ting
Liu, Fang-Hua
Chen, Hong-Yu
Xiao, Qian
Hou, Yang
Huang, Ying
Sun, Hong-Zan
Shi, Yu
Gao, Song
Lou, Yan
Chang, Qing
Zhao, Yu-Hong
Gao, Qing-Lei
Wu, Qi-Jun
Artificial intelligence performance in image-based ovarian cancer identification: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Artificial intelligence performance in image-based ovarian cancer identification: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Artificial intelligence performance in image-based ovarian cancer identification: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Artificial intelligence performance in image-based ovarian cancer identification: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Artificial intelligence performance in image-based ovarian cancer identification: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Artificial intelligence performance in image-based ovarian cancer identification: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort artificial intelligence performance in image-based ovarian cancer identification: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9486055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36147628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101662
work_keys_str_mv AT xuheli artificialintelligenceperformanceinimagebasedovariancanceridentificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gongtingting artificialintelligenceperformanceinimagebasedovariancanceridentificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liufanghua artificialintelligenceperformanceinimagebasedovariancanceridentificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenhongyu artificialintelligenceperformanceinimagebasedovariancanceridentificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiaoqian artificialintelligenceperformanceinimagebasedovariancanceridentificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT houyang artificialintelligenceperformanceinimagebasedovariancanceridentificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huangying artificialintelligenceperformanceinimagebasedovariancanceridentificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sunhongzan artificialintelligenceperformanceinimagebasedovariancanceridentificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shiyu artificialintelligenceperformanceinimagebasedovariancanceridentificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gaosong artificialintelligenceperformanceinimagebasedovariancanceridentificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT louyan artificialintelligenceperformanceinimagebasedovariancanceridentificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT changqing artificialintelligenceperformanceinimagebasedovariancanceridentificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaoyuhong artificialintelligenceperformanceinimagebasedovariancanceridentificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gaoqinglei artificialintelligenceperformanceinimagebasedovariancanceridentificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wuqijun artificialintelligenceperformanceinimagebasedovariancanceridentificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis