Cargando…
Artificial intelligence to detect the femoral intertrochanteric fracture: The arrival of the intelligent-medicine era
Objective: To explore a new artificial intelligence (AI)-aided method to assist the clinical diagnosis of femoral intertrochanteric fracture (FIF), and further compare the performance with human level to confirm the effect and feasibility of the AI algorithm. Methods: 700 X-rays of FIF were collecte...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9486191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36147533 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.927926 |
_version_ | 1784792225183432704 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Pengran Lu, Lin Chen, Yufei Huo, Tongtong Xue, Mingdi Wang, Honglin Fang, Ying Xie, Yi Xie, Mao Ye, Zhewei |
author_facet | Liu, Pengran Lu, Lin Chen, Yufei Huo, Tongtong Xue, Mingdi Wang, Honglin Fang, Ying Xie, Yi Xie, Mao Ye, Zhewei |
author_sort | Liu, Pengran |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To explore a new artificial intelligence (AI)-aided method to assist the clinical diagnosis of femoral intertrochanteric fracture (FIF), and further compare the performance with human level to confirm the effect and feasibility of the AI algorithm. Methods: 700 X-rays of FIF were collected and labeled by two senior orthopedic physicians to set up the database, 643 for the training database and 57 for the test database. A Faster-RCNN algorithm was applied to be trained and detect the FIF on X-rays. The performance of the AI algorithm such as accuracy, sensitivity, miss diagnosis rate, specificity, misdiagnosis rate, and time consumption was calculated and compared with that of orthopedic attending physicians. Results: Compared with orthopedic attending physicians, the Faster-RCNN algorithm performed better in accuracy (0.88 vs. 0.84 ± 0.04), specificity (0.87 vs. 0.71 ± 0.08), misdiagnosis rate (0.13 vs. 0.29 ± 0.08), and time consumption (5 min vs. 18.20 ± 1.92 min). As for the sensitivity and missed diagnosis rate, there was no statistical difference between the AI and orthopedic attending physicians (0.89 vs. 0.87 ± 0.03 and 0.11 vs. 0.13 ± 0.03). Conclusion: The AI diagnostic algorithm is an available and effective method for the clinical diagnosis of FIF. It could serve as a satisfying clinical assistant for orthopedic physicians. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9486191 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94861912022-09-21 Artificial intelligence to detect the femoral intertrochanteric fracture: The arrival of the intelligent-medicine era Liu, Pengran Lu, Lin Chen, Yufei Huo, Tongtong Xue, Mingdi Wang, Honglin Fang, Ying Xie, Yi Xie, Mao Ye, Zhewei Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Objective: To explore a new artificial intelligence (AI)-aided method to assist the clinical diagnosis of femoral intertrochanteric fracture (FIF), and further compare the performance with human level to confirm the effect and feasibility of the AI algorithm. Methods: 700 X-rays of FIF were collected and labeled by two senior orthopedic physicians to set up the database, 643 for the training database and 57 for the test database. A Faster-RCNN algorithm was applied to be trained and detect the FIF on X-rays. The performance of the AI algorithm such as accuracy, sensitivity, miss diagnosis rate, specificity, misdiagnosis rate, and time consumption was calculated and compared with that of orthopedic attending physicians. Results: Compared with orthopedic attending physicians, the Faster-RCNN algorithm performed better in accuracy (0.88 vs. 0.84 ± 0.04), specificity (0.87 vs. 0.71 ± 0.08), misdiagnosis rate (0.13 vs. 0.29 ± 0.08), and time consumption (5 min vs. 18.20 ± 1.92 min). As for the sensitivity and missed diagnosis rate, there was no statistical difference between the AI and orthopedic attending physicians (0.89 vs. 0.87 ± 0.03 and 0.11 vs. 0.13 ± 0.03). Conclusion: The AI diagnostic algorithm is an available and effective method for the clinical diagnosis of FIF. It could serve as a satisfying clinical assistant for orthopedic physicians. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9486191/ /pubmed/36147533 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.927926 Text en Copyright © 2022 Liu, Lu, Chen, Huo, Xue, Wang, Fang, Xie, Xie and Ye. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Bioengineering and Biotechnology Liu, Pengran Lu, Lin Chen, Yufei Huo, Tongtong Xue, Mingdi Wang, Honglin Fang, Ying Xie, Yi Xie, Mao Ye, Zhewei Artificial intelligence to detect the femoral intertrochanteric fracture: The arrival of the intelligent-medicine era |
title | Artificial intelligence to detect the femoral intertrochanteric fracture: The arrival of the intelligent-medicine era |
title_full | Artificial intelligence to detect the femoral intertrochanteric fracture: The arrival of the intelligent-medicine era |
title_fullStr | Artificial intelligence to detect the femoral intertrochanteric fracture: The arrival of the intelligent-medicine era |
title_full_unstemmed | Artificial intelligence to detect the femoral intertrochanteric fracture: The arrival of the intelligent-medicine era |
title_short | Artificial intelligence to detect the femoral intertrochanteric fracture: The arrival of the intelligent-medicine era |
title_sort | artificial intelligence to detect the femoral intertrochanteric fracture: the arrival of the intelligent-medicine era |
topic | Bioengineering and Biotechnology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9486191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36147533 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.927926 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liupengran artificialintelligencetodetectthefemoralintertrochantericfracturethearrivaloftheintelligentmedicineera AT lulin artificialintelligencetodetectthefemoralintertrochantericfracturethearrivaloftheintelligentmedicineera AT chenyufei artificialintelligencetodetectthefemoralintertrochantericfracturethearrivaloftheintelligentmedicineera AT huotongtong artificialintelligencetodetectthefemoralintertrochantericfracturethearrivaloftheintelligentmedicineera AT xuemingdi artificialintelligencetodetectthefemoralintertrochantericfracturethearrivaloftheintelligentmedicineera AT wanghonglin artificialintelligencetodetectthefemoralintertrochantericfracturethearrivaloftheintelligentmedicineera AT fangying artificialintelligencetodetectthefemoralintertrochantericfracturethearrivaloftheintelligentmedicineera AT xieyi artificialintelligencetodetectthefemoralintertrochantericfracturethearrivaloftheintelligentmedicineera AT xiemao artificialintelligencetodetectthefemoralintertrochantericfracturethearrivaloftheintelligentmedicineera AT yezhewei artificialintelligencetodetectthefemoralintertrochantericfracturethearrivaloftheintelligentmedicineera |