Cargando…

Self-reported measurements of physical literacy in adults: a scoping review

Physical literacy (PL) is a comprehensive concept covering motivation, confidence, physical competence, knowledge and understanding of individuals’ physical activity throughout life. PL has three overlapping domains, such as: an affective, a physical and a cognitive domain. So far, PL has not been m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ryom, Knud, Hargaard, Anne-Sofie, Melby, Paulina Sander, Maindal, Helle Terkildsen, Bentsen, Peter, Ntoumanis, Nikos, Schoeppe, Stephanie, Nielsen, Glen, Elsborg, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9486222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36123090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058351
_version_ 1784792231982399488
author Ryom, Knud
Hargaard, Anne-Sofie
Melby, Paulina Sander
Maindal, Helle Terkildsen
Bentsen, Peter
Ntoumanis, Nikos
Schoeppe, Stephanie
Nielsen, Glen
Elsborg, Peter
author_facet Ryom, Knud
Hargaard, Anne-Sofie
Melby, Paulina Sander
Maindal, Helle Terkildsen
Bentsen, Peter
Ntoumanis, Nikos
Schoeppe, Stephanie
Nielsen, Glen
Elsborg, Peter
author_sort Ryom, Knud
collection PubMed
description Physical literacy (PL) is a comprehensive concept covering motivation, confidence, physical competence, knowledge and understanding of individuals’ physical activity throughout life. PL has three overlapping domains, such as: an affective, a physical and a cognitive domain. So far, PL has not been measured in the adults and no complete measurement has been developed to date. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this scoping review was to review existing self-reported instruments measuring different elements of domains of PL. METHOD: We reviewed Education Research Complete, Cochrane, Medline, ScienceDirect, Scopus and SPORTDiscus. The reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Studies were coded using a thematic framework, which was based on the three domains of PL. The eligibility criteria were as follows: (1) age groups between 18 and 60 years; (2) meta-analyses, reviews or quantitative studies focusing on the measurement of at least one of the three domains of PL and (3) instrument that was self-reported. We finalised search on 1 August 2021 RESULTS: In total, 67 articles were identified as studies describing instruments reflecting the three domains of PL. Following full-text reading, 21 articles that met our inclusion criteria were included. Several instruments of relevance to PL are available for assessing motivation, confidence and the physical domain. However, few instruments exist that measure elements of the cognitive domain. CONCLUSION: This review showed that a range of existing and validated instruments exists, covering two out of the three domains of PL, namely affective and physical domains. However, for the knowledge domain no valid measurement tools could be found. This scoping review has identified gaps in the research (namely the cognitive domain) and also a gap in the research as no measures that consider the inter-relatedness of the three domains (holistic nature of the concept).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9486222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94862222022-09-21 Self-reported measurements of physical literacy in adults: a scoping review Ryom, Knud Hargaard, Anne-Sofie Melby, Paulina Sander Maindal, Helle Terkildsen Bentsen, Peter Ntoumanis, Nikos Schoeppe, Stephanie Nielsen, Glen Elsborg, Peter BMJ Open Public Health Physical literacy (PL) is a comprehensive concept covering motivation, confidence, physical competence, knowledge and understanding of individuals’ physical activity throughout life. PL has three overlapping domains, such as: an affective, a physical and a cognitive domain. So far, PL has not been measured in the adults and no complete measurement has been developed to date. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this scoping review was to review existing self-reported instruments measuring different elements of domains of PL. METHOD: We reviewed Education Research Complete, Cochrane, Medline, ScienceDirect, Scopus and SPORTDiscus. The reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Studies were coded using a thematic framework, which was based on the three domains of PL. The eligibility criteria were as follows: (1) age groups between 18 and 60 years; (2) meta-analyses, reviews or quantitative studies focusing on the measurement of at least one of the three domains of PL and (3) instrument that was self-reported. We finalised search on 1 August 2021 RESULTS: In total, 67 articles were identified as studies describing instruments reflecting the three domains of PL. Following full-text reading, 21 articles that met our inclusion criteria were included. Several instruments of relevance to PL are available for assessing motivation, confidence and the physical domain. However, few instruments exist that measure elements of the cognitive domain. CONCLUSION: This review showed that a range of existing and validated instruments exists, covering two out of the three domains of PL, namely affective and physical domains. However, for the knowledge domain no valid measurement tools could be found. This scoping review has identified gaps in the research (namely the cognitive domain) and also a gap in the research as no measures that consider the inter-relatedness of the three domains (holistic nature of the concept). BMJ Publishing Group 2022-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9486222/ /pubmed/36123090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058351 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Public Health
Ryom, Knud
Hargaard, Anne-Sofie
Melby, Paulina Sander
Maindal, Helle Terkildsen
Bentsen, Peter
Ntoumanis, Nikos
Schoeppe, Stephanie
Nielsen, Glen
Elsborg, Peter
Self-reported measurements of physical literacy in adults: a scoping review
title Self-reported measurements of physical literacy in adults: a scoping review
title_full Self-reported measurements of physical literacy in adults: a scoping review
title_fullStr Self-reported measurements of physical literacy in adults: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Self-reported measurements of physical literacy in adults: a scoping review
title_short Self-reported measurements of physical literacy in adults: a scoping review
title_sort self-reported measurements of physical literacy in adults: a scoping review
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9486222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36123090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058351
work_keys_str_mv AT ryomknud selfreportedmeasurementsofphysicalliteracyinadultsascopingreview
AT hargaardannesofie selfreportedmeasurementsofphysicalliteracyinadultsascopingreview
AT melbypaulinasander selfreportedmeasurementsofphysicalliteracyinadultsascopingreview
AT maindalhelleterkildsen selfreportedmeasurementsofphysicalliteracyinadultsascopingreview
AT bentsenpeter selfreportedmeasurementsofphysicalliteracyinadultsascopingreview
AT ntoumanisnikos selfreportedmeasurementsofphysicalliteracyinadultsascopingreview
AT schoeppestephanie selfreportedmeasurementsofphysicalliteracyinadultsascopingreview
AT nielsenglen selfreportedmeasurementsofphysicalliteracyinadultsascopingreview
AT elsborgpeter selfreportedmeasurementsofphysicalliteracyinadultsascopingreview