Cargando…
Self-reported measurements of physical literacy in adults: a scoping review
Physical literacy (PL) is a comprehensive concept covering motivation, confidence, physical competence, knowledge and understanding of individuals’ physical activity throughout life. PL has three overlapping domains, such as: an affective, a physical and a cognitive domain. So far, PL has not been m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9486222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36123090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058351 |
_version_ | 1784792231982399488 |
---|---|
author | Ryom, Knud Hargaard, Anne-Sofie Melby, Paulina Sander Maindal, Helle Terkildsen Bentsen, Peter Ntoumanis, Nikos Schoeppe, Stephanie Nielsen, Glen Elsborg, Peter |
author_facet | Ryom, Knud Hargaard, Anne-Sofie Melby, Paulina Sander Maindal, Helle Terkildsen Bentsen, Peter Ntoumanis, Nikos Schoeppe, Stephanie Nielsen, Glen Elsborg, Peter |
author_sort | Ryom, Knud |
collection | PubMed |
description | Physical literacy (PL) is a comprehensive concept covering motivation, confidence, physical competence, knowledge and understanding of individuals’ physical activity throughout life. PL has three overlapping domains, such as: an affective, a physical and a cognitive domain. So far, PL has not been measured in the adults and no complete measurement has been developed to date. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this scoping review was to review existing self-reported instruments measuring different elements of domains of PL. METHOD: We reviewed Education Research Complete, Cochrane, Medline, ScienceDirect, Scopus and SPORTDiscus. The reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Studies were coded using a thematic framework, which was based on the three domains of PL. The eligibility criteria were as follows: (1) age groups between 18 and 60 years; (2) meta-analyses, reviews or quantitative studies focusing on the measurement of at least one of the three domains of PL and (3) instrument that was self-reported. We finalised search on 1 August 2021 RESULTS: In total, 67 articles were identified as studies describing instruments reflecting the three domains of PL. Following full-text reading, 21 articles that met our inclusion criteria were included. Several instruments of relevance to PL are available for assessing motivation, confidence and the physical domain. However, few instruments exist that measure elements of the cognitive domain. CONCLUSION: This review showed that a range of existing and validated instruments exists, covering two out of the three domains of PL, namely affective and physical domains. However, for the knowledge domain no valid measurement tools could be found. This scoping review has identified gaps in the research (namely the cognitive domain) and also a gap in the research as no measures that consider the inter-relatedness of the three domains (holistic nature of the concept). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9486222 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94862222022-09-21 Self-reported measurements of physical literacy in adults: a scoping review Ryom, Knud Hargaard, Anne-Sofie Melby, Paulina Sander Maindal, Helle Terkildsen Bentsen, Peter Ntoumanis, Nikos Schoeppe, Stephanie Nielsen, Glen Elsborg, Peter BMJ Open Public Health Physical literacy (PL) is a comprehensive concept covering motivation, confidence, physical competence, knowledge and understanding of individuals’ physical activity throughout life. PL has three overlapping domains, such as: an affective, a physical and a cognitive domain. So far, PL has not been measured in the adults and no complete measurement has been developed to date. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this scoping review was to review existing self-reported instruments measuring different elements of domains of PL. METHOD: We reviewed Education Research Complete, Cochrane, Medline, ScienceDirect, Scopus and SPORTDiscus. The reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Studies were coded using a thematic framework, which was based on the three domains of PL. The eligibility criteria were as follows: (1) age groups between 18 and 60 years; (2) meta-analyses, reviews or quantitative studies focusing on the measurement of at least one of the three domains of PL and (3) instrument that was self-reported. We finalised search on 1 August 2021 RESULTS: In total, 67 articles were identified as studies describing instruments reflecting the three domains of PL. Following full-text reading, 21 articles that met our inclusion criteria were included. Several instruments of relevance to PL are available for assessing motivation, confidence and the physical domain. However, few instruments exist that measure elements of the cognitive domain. CONCLUSION: This review showed that a range of existing and validated instruments exists, covering two out of the three domains of PL, namely affective and physical domains. However, for the knowledge domain no valid measurement tools could be found. This scoping review has identified gaps in the research (namely the cognitive domain) and also a gap in the research as no measures that consider the inter-relatedness of the three domains (holistic nature of the concept). BMJ Publishing Group 2022-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9486222/ /pubmed/36123090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058351 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Public Health Ryom, Knud Hargaard, Anne-Sofie Melby, Paulina Sander Maindal, Helle Terkildsen Bentsen, Peter Ntoumanis, Nikos Schoeppe, Stephanie Nielsen, Glen Elsborg, Peter Self-reported measurements of physical literacy in adults: a scoping review |
title | Self-reported measurements of physical literacy in adults: a scoping review |
title_full | Self-reported measurements of physical literacy in adults: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Self-reported measurements of physical literacy in adults: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Self-reported measurements of physical literacy in adults: a scoping review |
title_short | Self-reported measurements of physical literacy in adults: a scoping review |
title_sort | self-reported measurements of physical literacy in adults: a scoping review |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9486222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36123090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058351 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ryomknud selfreportedmeasurementsofphysicalliteracyinadultsascopingreview AT hargaardannesofie selfreportedmeasurementsofphysicalliteracyinadultsascopingreview AT melbypaulinasander selfreportedmeasurementsofphysicalliteracyinadultsascopingreview AT maindalhelleterkildsen selfreportedmeasurementsofphysicalliteracyinadultsascopingreview AT bentsenpeter selfreportedmeasurementsofphysicalliteracyinadultsascopingreview AT ntoumanisnikos selfreportedmeasurementsofphysicalliteracyinadultsascopingreview AT schoeppestephanie selfreportedmeasurementsofphysicalliteracyinadultsascopingreview AT nielsenglen selfreportedmeasurementsofphysicalliteracyinadultsascopingreview AT elsborgpeter selfreportedmeasurementsofphysicalliteracyinadultsascopingreview |