Cargando…
Acceptability of text messages and knowledge change for cervical cancer screening: a Tanzanian mixed methods study
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the acceptability of a text message intervention and evaluate if text messages could increase knowledge of cervical cancer and screening. DESIGN: This study was a substudy of a randomised controlled trial that used a mixed methods research design combining a quantitative q...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9486230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36123109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058450 |
_version_ | 1784792233692626944 |
---|---|
author | Løkke, Kristian Foldager Rasch, Vibeke Mwaiselage, Julius Gammeltoft, Tine Linde, Ditte Søndergaard |
author_facet | Løkke, Kristian Foldager Rasch, Vibeke Mwaiselage, Julius Gammeltoft, Tine Linde, Ditte Søndergaard |
author_sort | Løkke, Kristian Foldager |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To investigate the acceptability of a text message intervention and evaluate if text messages could increase knowledge of cervical cancer and screening. DESIGN: This study was a substudy of a randomised controlled trial that used a mixed methods research design combining a quantitative questionnaire dataset and qualitative interview data. A before and after assessment was made of questionnaire responses. Acceptability was measured on a 6-point Likert scale and knowledge was measured through 16 binary true/false knowledge questions concerning cervical cancer and screening. Qualitative data were coded using a combined inductive–deductive approach. SETTING: Ocean Road Cancer Institute in Dar es Salaam as well as Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center and Mawenzi Regional hospital in the Kilimanjaro Region in Tanzania. PARTICIPANTS: Human papillomavirus (HPV) positive women who had been randomised to the intervention group and received educative and reminder messages. Qualitative interviews were conducted with a subgroup of women in the intervention group. INTERVENTIONS: 15 one-way educative and reminder text messages. RESULTS: A total of 115 women in the intervention group responded to both the baseline and follow-up questionnaire. Overall, women found it highly acceptable to receive text messages, and there was a trend towards acceptability rising between baseline and follow-up (mean: 0.22; 95% CI 0.00 to 0.44; p=0.05; t-statics=1.96). A significant increase in acceptability was found among the lowest educated and those who had not previously been screened. The qualitative interviews showed that the underlying reasons for the high acceptability rate were that the women felt someone cared for them and that the text messages were for their own benefits. The text messages did not improve the women’s knowledge on cervical cancer and screening. CONCLUSIONS: Educative and reminder text messages are highly acceptable among HPV-positive Tanzanian women; however, they do not increase the women’s knowledge of cervical cancer and screening. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: clingov (NCT02509702). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9486230 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94862302022-09-21 Acceptability of text messages and knowledge change for cervical cancer screening: a Tanzanian mixed methods study Løkke, Kristian Foldager Rasch, Vibeke Mwaiselage, Julius Gammeltoft, Tine Linde, Ditte Søndergaard BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVES: To investigate the acceptability of a text message intervention and evaluate if text messages could increase knowledge of cervical cancer and screening. DESIGN: This study was a substudy of a randomised controlled trial that used a mixed methods research design combining a quantitative questionnaire dataset and qualitative interview data. A before and after assessment was made of questionnaire responses. Acceptability was measured on a 6-point Likert scale and knowledge was measured through 16 binary true/false knowledge questions concerning cervical cancer and screening. Qualitative data were coded using a combined inductive–deductive approach. SETTING: Ocean Road Cancer Institute in Dar es Salaam as well as Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center and Mawenzi Regional hospital in the Kilimanjaro Region in Tanzania. PARTICIPANTS: Human papillomavirus (HPV) positive women who had been randomised to the intervention group and received educative and reminder messages. Qualitative interviews were conducted with a subgroup of women in the intervention group. INTERVENTIONS: 15 one-way educative and reminder text messages. RESULTS: A total of 115 women in the intervention group responded to both the baseline and follow-up questionnaire. Overall, women found it highly acceptable to receive text messages, and there was a trend towards acceptability rising between baseline and follow-up (mean: 0.22; 95% CI 0.00 to 0.44; p=0.05; t-statics=1.96). A significant increase in acceptability was found among the lowest educated and those who had not previously been screened. The qualitative interviews showed that the underlying reasons for the high acceptability rate were that the women felt someone cared for them and that the text messages were for their own benefits. The text messages did not improve the women’s knowledge on cervical cancer and screening. CONCLUSIONS: Educative and reminder text messages are highly acceptable among HPV-positive Tanzanian women; however, they do not increase the women’s knowledge of cervical cancer and screening. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: clingov (NCT02509702). BMJ Publishing Group 2022-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9486230/ /pubmed/36123109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058450 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Obstetrics and Gynaecology Løkke, Kristian Foldager Rasch, Vibeke Mwaiselage, Julius Gammeltoft, Tine Linde, Ditte Søndergaard Acceptability of text messages and knowledge change for cervical cancer screening: a Tanzanian mixed methods study |
title | Acceptability of text messages and knowledge change for cervical cancer screening: a Tanzanian mixed methods study |
title_full | Acceptability of text messages and knowledge change for cervical cancer screening: a Tanzanian mixed methods study |
title_fullStr | Acceptability of text messages and knowledge change for cervical cancer screening: a Tanzanian mixed methods study |
title_full_unstemmed | Acceptability of text messages and knowledge change for cervical cancer screening: a Tanzanian mixed methods study |
title_short | Acceptability of text messages and knowledge change for cervical cancer screening: a Tanzanian mixed methods study |
title_sort | acceptability of text messages and knowledge change for cervical cancer screening: a tanzanian mixed methods study |
topic | Obstetrics and Gynaecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9486230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36123109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058450 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT løkkekristianfoldager acceptabilityoftextmessagesandknowledgechangeforcervicalcancerscreeningatanzanianmixedmethodsstudy AT raschvibeke acceptabilityoftextmessagesandknowledgechangeforcervicalcancerscreeningatanzanianmixedmethodsstudy AT mwaiselagejulius acceptabilityoftextmessagesandknowledgechangeforcervicalcancerscreeningatanzanianmixedmethodsstudy AT gammeltofttine acceptabilityoftextmessagesandknowledgechangeforcervicalcancerscreeningatanzanianmixedmethodsstudy AT lindedittesøndergaard acceptabilityoftextmessagesandknowledgechangeforcervicalcancerscreeningatanzanianmixedmethodsstudy |