Cargando…

Effect of early integrated robot-assisted gait training on motor and balance in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Gait disruption is a common poststroke problem. Robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) might improve motor function, balance, and activities of daily living. OBJECTIVE: We compared the clinical effectiveness of early integrated RAGT using the Walkbot robotic gym with an intensity-matched en...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meng, Guilin, Ma, Xiaoye, Chen, Pengfei, Xu, Shaofang, Li, Mingliang, Zhao, Yichen, Jin, Aiping, Liu, Xueyuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9486263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36147622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864221123195
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Gait disruption is a common poststroke problem. Robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) might improve motor function, balance, and activities of daily living. OBJECTIVE: We compared the clinical effectiveness of early integrated RAGT using the Walkbot robotic gym with an intensity-matched enhanced lower limb therapy (ELLT) program and with conventional rehabilitation therapy (CRT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: A total of 192 patients with acute ischemic stroke were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive RAGT, ELLT, or CRT. All three groups received 45 min of training daily, 3 days a week, for 4 weeks consecutively. Before and after the 4-week treatment, the patients were assessed based on a 6-minute walking test (6MWT), functional ambulation classification (FAC), timed up and go (TUG) test, dual-task walking (DTW) test, Tinetti’s test, Barthel’s index (BI), stroke-specific quality of life (SS-QOL) scale, and gait analysis parameters. RESULTS: After the 4-week intervention, the results of the 6MWT, FAC, TUG, DTW, Tinetti’s test, BI, SS-QOL, and gait in the three groups significantly improved. Compared with ELLT and CRT groups, participants in the RAGT group had a better performance in 6MWT (199.11 ± 60.72 versus 182.47 ± 59.72 versus 173.69 ± 40.58, p = 0.035), FAC (4.10 ± 0.91 versus 3.69 ± 0.88 versus 3.58 ± 0.81, p = 0.044), DTW (10.29 ± 2.38 versus 12.92 ± 2.64 versus 13.89 ± 2.62, p = 0.031), SS-QOL (184.46 ± 20.53 versus 165.39 ± 20.49 versus 150.72 ± 20.59, p = 0.012), velocity (0.66 ± 0.22 versus 0.55 ± 0.23 versus 0.51 ± 0.20, p = 0.008), cycle duration (1.38 ± 0.40 versus 1.50 ± 0.38 versus 1.61 ± 0.30, p = 0.040), and swing phase symmetry ratio (SPSR, 1.10 ± 0.33 versus 1.21 ± 0.22 versus 1.48 ± 0.25, p = 0.021). The TUG, Tinetti’s test, BI, and RMT results were similar, however. CONCLUSION: In the acute stroke phase, early integrated RAGT showed greater performance in gait rehabilitation than CRT and ELLT. REGISTRATION: ChiCTR1900026225