Cargando…

Advancement of door-to-needle times in acute stroke treatment after repetitive process analysis: never give up!

BACKGROUND: In acute ischemic stroke, timely treatment is of utmost relevance. Identification of delaying factors and knowledge about challenges concerning hospital structures are crucial for continuous improvement of process times in stroke care. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we report on our experienc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ernst, Johanna, Storch, Kai F., Tran, Anh Thu, Gabriel, Maria M., Leotescu, Andrei, Boeck, Anna-Lena, Huber, Meret K., Abu-Fares, Omar, Bronzlik, Paul, Götz, Friedrich, Worthmann, Hans, Schuppner, Ramona, Grosse, Gerrit M., Weissenborn, Karin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9486271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36147621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864221122491
_version_ 1784792242015174656
author Ernst, Johanna
Storch, Kai F.
Tran, Anh Thu
Gabriel, Maria M.
Leotescu, Andrei
Boeck, Anna-Lena
Huber, Meret K.
Abu-Fares, Omar
Bronzlik, Paul
Götz, Friedrich
Worthmann, Hans
Schuppner, Ramona
Grosse, Gerrit M.
Weissenborn, Karin
author_facet Ernst, Johanna
Storch, Kai F.
Tran, Anh Thu
Gabriel, Maria M.
Leotescu, Andrei
Boeck, Anna-Lena
Huber, Meret K.
Abu-Fares, Omar
Bronzlik, Paul
Götz, Friedrich
Worthmann, Hans
Schuppner, Ramona
Grosse, Gerrit M.
Weissenborn, Karin
author_sort Ernst, Johanna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In acute ischemic stroke, timely treatment is of utmost relevance. Identification of delaying factors and knowledge about challenges concerning hospital structures are crucial for continuous improvement of process times in stroke care. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we report on our experience in optimizing the door-to-needle time (DNT) at our tertiary care center by continuous quality improvement. METHODS: Five hundred forty patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) at Hannover Medical School were consecutively analyzed in two phases. In study phase I, including 292 patients, process times and delaying factors were collected prospectively from May 2015 until September 2017. In study phase II, process times of 248 patients were obtained from January 2019 until February 2021. In each study phase, a new clinical standard operation procedure (SOP) was implemented, considering previously identified delaying factors. Pre- and post-SOP treatment times and delaying factors were analyzed to evaluate the new protocols. RESULTS: In study phase I, SOP I reduced the median DNT by 15 min. The probability to receive treatment within 30 min after admission increased by factor 5.35 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.46–11.66]. Further development of the SOP with implementation of a mobile thrombolysis kit led to a further decrease of DNT by 5 min in median in study phase II. The median DNT was 29 (25th–75th percentiles: 18–44) min, and the probability to undergo IVT within 15 min after admission increased by factor 4.2 (95% CI: 1.63–10.83) compared with study phase I. CONCLUSION: Continuous process analysis and subsequent development of targeted workflow adjustments led to a substantial improvement of DNT. These results illustrate that with appropriate vigilance, there is constantly an opportunity for improvement in stroke care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9486271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94862712022-09-21 Advancement of door-to-needle times in acute stroke treatment after repetitive process analysis: never give up! Ernst, Johanna Storch, Kai F. Tran, Anh Thu Gabriel, Maria M. Leotescu, Andrei Boeck, Anna-Lena Huber, Meret K. Abu-Fares, Omar Bronzlik, Paul Götz, Friedrich Worthmann, Hans Schuppner, Ramona Grosse, Gerrit M. Weissenborn, Karin Ther Adv Neurol Disord Original Research BACKGROUND: In acute ischemic stroke, timely treatment is of utmost relevance. Identification of delaying factors and knowledge about challenges concerning hospital structures are crucial for continuous improvement of process times in stroke care. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we report on our experience in optimizing the door-to-needle time (DNT) at our tertiary care center by continuous quality improvement. METHODS: Five hundred forty patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) at Hannover Medical School were consecutively analyzed in two phases. In study phase I, including 292 patients, process times and delaying factors were collected prospectively from May 2015 until September 2017. In study phase II, process times of 248 patients were obtained from January 2019 until February 2021. In each study phase, a new clinical standard operation procedure (SOP) was implemented, considering previously identified delaying factors. Pre- and post-SOP treatment times and delaying factors were analyzed to evaluate the new protocols. RESULTS: In study phase I, SOP I reduced the median DNT by 15 min. The probability to receive treatment within 30 min after admission increased by factor 5.35 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.46–11.66]. Further development of the SOP with implementation of a mobile thrombolysis kit led to a further decrease of DNT by 5 min in median in study phase II. The median DNT was 29 (25th–75th percentiles: 18–44) min, and the probability to undergo IVT within 15 min after admission increased by factor 4.2 (95% CI: 1.63–10.83) compared with study phase I. CONCLUSION: Continuous process analysis and subsequent development of targeted workflow adjustments led to a substantial improvement of DNT. These results illustrate that with appropriate vigilance, there is constantly an opportunity for improvement in stroke care. SAGE Publications 2022-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9486271/ /pubmed/36147621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864221122491 Text en © The Author(s), 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Ernst, Johanna
Storch, Kai F.
Tran, Anh Thu
Gabriel, Maria M.
Leotescu, Andrei
Boeck, Anna-Lena
Huber, Meret K.
Abu-Fares, Omar
Bronzlik, Paul
Götz, Friedrich
Worthmann, Hans
Schuppner, Ramona
Grosse, Gerrit M.
Weissenborn, Karin
Advancement of door-to-needle times in acute stroke treatment after repetitive process analysis: never give up!
title Advancement of door-to-needle times in acute stroke treatment after repetitive process analysis: never give up!
title_full Advancement of door-to-needle times in acute stroke treatment after repetitive process analysis: never give up!
title_fullStr Advancement of door-to-needle times in acute stroke treatment after repetitive process analysis: never give up!
title_full_unstemmed Advancement of door-to-needle times in acute stroke treatment after repetitive process analysis: never give up!
title_short Advancement of door-to-needle times in acute stroke treatment after repetitive process analysis: never give up!
title_sort advancement of door-to-needle times in acute stroke treatment after repetitive process analysis: never give up!
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9486271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36147621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864221122491
work_keys_str_mv AT ernstjohanna advancementofdoortoneedletimesinacutestroketreatmentafterrepetitiveprocessanalysisnevergiveup
AT storchkaif advancementofdoortoneedletimesinacutestroketreatmentafterrepetitiveprocessanalysisnevergiveup
AT trananhthu advancementofdoortoneedletimesinacutestroketreatmentafterrepetitiveprocessanalysisnevergiveup
AT gabrielmariam advancementofdoortoneedletimesinacutestroketreatmentafterrepetitiveprocessanalysisnevergiveup
AT leotescuandrei advancementofdoortoneedletimesinacutestroketreatmentafterrepetitiveprocessanalysisnevergiveup
AT boeckannalena advancementofdoortoneedletimesinacutestroketreatmentafterrepetitiveprocessanalysisnevergiveup
AT hubermeretk advancementofdoortoneedletimesinacutestroketreatmentafterrepetitiveprocessanalysisnevergiveup
AT abufaresomar advancementofdoortoneedletimesinacutestroketreatmentafterrepetitiveprocessanalysisnevergiveup
AT bronzlikpaul advancementofdoortoneedletimesinacutestroketreatmentafterrepetitiveprocessanalysisnevergiveup
AT gotzfriedrich advancementofdoortoneedletimesinacutestroketreatmentafterrepetitiveprocessanalysisnevergiveup
AT worthmannhans advancementofdoortoneedletimesinacutestroketreatmentafterrepetitiveprocessanalysisnevergiveup
AT schuppnerramona advancementofdoortoneedletimesinacutestroketreatmentafterrepetitiveprocessanalysisnevergiveup
AT grossegerritm advancementofdoortoneedletimesinacutestroketreatmentafterrepetitiveprocessanalysisnevergiveup
AT weissenbornkarin advancementofdoortoneedletimesinacutestroketreatmentafterrepetitiveprocessanalysisnevergiveup