Cargando…
Advancement of door-to-needle times in acute stroke treatment after repetitive process analysis: never give up!
BACKGROUND: In acute ischemic stroke, timely treatment is of utmost relevance. Identification of delaying factors and knowledge about challenges concerning hospital structures are crucial for continuous improvement of process times in stroke care. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we report on our experienc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9486271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36147621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864221122491 |
_version_ | 1784792242015174656 |
---|---|
author | Ernst, Johanna Storch, Kai F. Tran, Anh Thu Gabriel, Maria M. Leotescu, Andrei Boeck, Anna-Lena Huber, Meret K. Abu-Fares, Omar Bronzlik, Paul Götz, Friedrich Worthmann, Hans Schuppner, Ramona Grosse, Gerrit M. Weissenborn, Karin |
author_facet | Ernst, Johanna Storch, Kai F. Tran, Anh Thu Gabriel, Maria M. Leotescu, Andrei Boeck, Anna-Lena Huber, Meret K. Abu-Fares, Omar Bronzlik, Paul Götz, Friedrich Worthmann, Hans Schuppner, Ramona Grosse, Gerrit M. Weissenborn, Karin |
author_sort | Ernst, Johanna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In acute ischemic stroke, timely treatment is of utmost relevance. Identification of delaying factors and knowledge about challenges concerning hospital structures are crucial for continuous improvement of process times in stroke care. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we report on our experience in optimizing the door-to-needle time (DNT) at our tertiary care center by continuous quality improvement. METHODS: Five hundred forty patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) at Hannover Medical School were consecutively analyzed in two phases. In study phase I, including 292 patients, process times and delaying factors were collected prospectively from May 2015 until September 2017. In study phase II, process times of 248 patients were obtained from January 2019 until February 2021. In each study phase, a new clinical standard operation procedure (SOP) was implemented, considering previously identified delaying factors. Pre- and post-SOP treatment times and delaying factors were analyzed to evaluate the new protocols. RESULTS: In study phase I, SOP I reduced the median DNT by 15 min. The probability to receive treatment within 30 min after admission increased by factor 5.35 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.46–11.66]. Further development of the SOP with implementation of a mobile thrombolysis kit led to a further decrease of DNT by 5 min in median in study phase II. The median DNT was 29 (25th–75th percentiles: 18–44) min, and the probability to undergo IVT within 15 min after admission increased by factor 4.2 (95% CI: 1.63–10.83) compared with study phase I. CONCLUSION: Continuous process analysis and subsequent development of targeted workflow adjustments led to a substantial improvement of DNT. These results illustrate that with appropriate vigilance, there is constantly an opportunity for improvement in stroke care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9486271 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94862712022-09-21 Advancement of door-to-needle times in acute stroke treatment after repetitive process analysis: never give up! Ernst, Johanna Storch, Kai F. Tran, Anh Thu Gabriel, Maria M. Leotescu, Andrei Boeck, Anna-Lena Huber, Meret K. Abu-Fares, Omar Bronzlik, Paul Götz, Friedrich Worthmann, Hans Schuppner, Ramona Grosse, Gerrit M. Weissenborn, Karin Ther Adv Neurol Disord Original Research BACKGROUND: In acute ischemic stroke, timely treatment is of utmost relevance. Identification of delaying factors and knowledge about challenges concerning hospital structures are crucial for continuous improvement of process times in stroke care. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we report on our experience in optimizing the door-to-needle time (DNT) at our tertiary care center by continuous quality improvement. METHODS: Five hundred forty patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) at Hannover Medical School were consecutively analyzed in two phases. In study phase I, including 292 patients, process times and delaying factors were collected prospectively from May 2015 until September 2017. In study phase II, process times of 248 patients were obtained from January 2019 until February 2021. In each study phase, a new clinical standard operation procedure (SOP) was implemented, considering previously identified delaying factors. Pre- and post-SOP treatment times and delaying factors were analyzed to evaluate the new protocols. RESULTS: In study phase I, SOP I reduced the median DNT by 15 min. The probability to receive treatment within 30 min after admission increased by factor 5.35 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.46–11.66]. Further development of the SOP with implementation of a mobile thrombolysis kit led to a further decrease of DNT by 5 min in median in study phase II. The median DNT was 29 (25th–75th percentiles: 18–44) min, and the probability to undergo IVT within 15 min after admission increased by factor 4.2 (95% CI: 1.63–10.83) compared with study phase I. CONCLUSION: Continuous process analysis and subsequent development of targeted workflow adjustments led to a substantial improvement of DNT. These results illustrate that with appropriate vigilance, there is constantly an opportunity for improvement in stroke care. SAGE Publications 2022-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9486271/ /pubmed/36147621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864221122491 Text en © The Author(s), 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Ernst, Johanna Storch, Kai F. Tran, Anh Thu Gabriel, Maria M. Leotescu, Andrei Boeck, Anna-Lena Huber, Meret K. Abu-Fares, Omar Bronzlik, Paul Götz, Friedrich Worthmann, Hans Schuppner, Ramona Grosse, Gerrit M. Weissenborn, Karin Advancement of door-to-needle times in acute stroke treatment after repetitive process analysis: never give up! |
title | Advancement of door-to-needle times in acute stroke treatment after
repetitive process analysis: never give up! |
title_full | Advancement of door-to-needle times in acute stroke treatment after
repetitive process analysis: never give up! |
title_fullStr | Advancement of door-to-needle times in acute stroke treatment after
repetitive process analysis: never give up! |
title_full_unstemmed | Advancement of door-to-needle times in acute stroke treatment after
repetitive process analysis: never give up! |
title_short | Advancement of door-to-needle times in acute stroke treatment after
repetitive process analysis: never give up! |
title_sort | advancement of door-to-needle times in acute stroke treatment after
repetitive process analysis: never give up! |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9486271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36147621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864221122491 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ernstjohanna advancementofdoortoneedletimesinacutestroketreatmentafterrepetitiveprocessanalysisnevergiveup AT storchkaif advancementofdoortoneedletimesinacutestroketreatmentafterrepetitiveprocessanalysisnevergiveup AT trananhthu advancementofdoortoneedletimesinacutestroketreatmentafterrepetitiveprocessanalysisnevergiveup AT gabrielmariam advancementofdoortoneedletimesinacutestroketreatmentafterrepetitiveprocessanalysisnevergiveup AT leotescuandrei advancementofdoortoneedletimesinacutestroketreatmentafterrepetitiveprocessanalysisnevergiveup AT boeckannalena advancementofdoortoneedletimesinacutestroketreatmentafterrepetitiveprocessanalysisnevergiveup AT hubermeretk advancementofdoortoneedletimesinacutestroketreatmentafterrepetitiveprocessanalysisnevergiveup AT abufaresomar advancementofdoortoneedletimesinacutestroketreatmentafterrepetitiveprocessanalysisnevergiveup AT bronzlikpaul advancementofdoortoneedletimesinacutestroketreatmentafterrepetitiveprocessanalysisnevergiveup AT gotzfriedrich advancementofdoortoneedletimesinacutestroketreatmentafterrepetitiveprocessanalysisnevergiveup AT worthmannhans advancementofdoortoneedletimesinacutestroketreatmentafterrepetitiveprocessanalysisnevergiveup AT schuppnerramona advancementofdoortoneedletimesinacutestroketreatmentafterrepetitiveprocessanalysisnevergiveup AT grossegerritm advancementofdoortoneedletimesinacutestroketreatmentafterrepetitiveprocessanalysisnevergiveup AT weissenbornkarin advancementofdoortoneedletimesinacutestroketreatmentafterrepetitiveprocessanalysisnevergiveup |