Cargando…

Process of youth engagement in school health promotion: a scoping review protocol

INTRODUCTION: School environments are an essential setting to shape and influence the health and well-being of students. Health promoting school (HPS) is a whole-school approach that strengthens and builds a safe and healthy school environment for students to learn and develop. A core component of H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kontak, Julia C, Kirk, Sara F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9486345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36123089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063889
_version_ 1784792259980427264
author Kontak, Julia C
Kirk, Sara F
author_facet Kontak, Julia C
Kirk, Sara F
author_sort Kontak, Julia C
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: School environments are an essential setting to shape and influence the health and well-being of students. Health promoting school (HPS) is a whole-school approach that strengthens and builds a safe and healthy school environment for students to learn and develop. A core component of HPS is the meaningful participation of youth. Despite promising outcomes arising from youth engagement in school health promotion, there is less known on the process of how students are involved in school health promotion and in what form. This scoping review will explore and map the different components of the student engagement process in school health promotion with specific focus on whole-school approaches like HPS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will follow scoping review guidelines employed by the Joanna Briggs Institute and Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. We will use the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews to guide reporting. We will follow the PCC mnemonic (participant, concept and context) to develop eligibility criteria. Both published and unpublished literature will be included. Databases to be searched include: CINAHL, ERIC, MEDLINE, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global databases and Google Scholar. Relevant organisational websites and sources identified by experts will also be reviewed. Two reviewers will screen the title, abstract and full text of the sourced articles. Data from included articles will be charted using a data charting tool. The socioecological model and Hart’s Ladder of Participation will be used to guide charting. Descriptive analysis will be conducted for quantitative data, and thematic analysis will be employed for qualitative data. Data will be displayed through tables and narrative descriptions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required for this study. To disseminate our work, we plan to develop an open-access publication, accompanied by a conference presentation and other knowledge translation products.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9486345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94863452022-09-21 Process of youth engagement in school health promotion: a scoping review protocol Kontak, Julia C Kirk, Sara F BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: School environments are an essential setting to shape and influence the health and well-being of students. Health promoting school (HPS) is a whole-school approach that strengthens and builds a safe and healthy school environment for students to learn and develop. A core component of HPS is the meaningful participation of youth. Despite promising outcomes arising from youth engagement in school health promotion, there is less known on the process of how students are involved in school health promotion and in what form. This scoping review will explore and map the different components of the student engagement process in school health promotion with specific focus on whole-school approaches like HPS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will follow scoping review guidelines employed by the Joanna Briggs Institute and Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. We will use the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews to guide reporting. We will follow the PCC mnemonic (participant, concept and context) to develop eligibility criteria. Both published and unpublished literature will be included. Databases to be searched include: CINAHL, ERIC, MEDLINE, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global databases and Google Scholar. Relevant organisational websites and sources identified by experts will also be reviewed. Two reviewers will screen the title, abstract and full text of the sourced articles. Data from included articles will be charted using a data charting tool. The socioecological model and Hart’s Ladder of Participation will be used to guide charting. Descriptive analysis will be conducted for quantitative data, and thematic analysis will be employed for qualitative data. Data will be displayed through tables and narrative descriptions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required for this study. To disseminate our work, we plan to develop an open-access publication, accompanied by a conference presentation and other knowledge translation products. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9486345/ /pubmed/36123089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063889 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Public Health
Kontak, Julia C
Kirk, Sara F
Process of youth engagement in school health promotion: a scoping review protocol
title Process of youth engagement in school health promotion: a scoping review protocol
title_full Process of youth engagement in school health promotion: a scoping review protocol
title_fullStr Process of youth engagement in school health promotion: a scoping review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Process of youth engagement in school health promotion: a scoping review protocol
title_short Process of youth engagement in school health promotion: a scoping review protocol
title_sort process of youth engagement in school health promotion: a scoping review protocol
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9486345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36123089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063889
work_keys_str_mv AT kontakjuliac processofyouthengagementinschoolhealthpromotionascopingreviewprotocol
AT kirksaraf processofyouthengagementinschoolhealthpromotionascopingreviewprotocol