Cargando…

Treatment Time Optimization in Single Fraction Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy: A 10-Year Institutional Experience

PURPOSE: Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) delivered in a single fraction (SF) can be considered to have higher uncertainty given that the error probability is concentrated in a single session. This study aims to report the variation in technology and technique used and its effect on in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gaudreault, Mathieu, Yeo, Adam, Kron, Tomas, Hanna, Gerard G., Siva, Shankar, Hardcastle, Nicholas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9486429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36148377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2021.100829
_version_ 1784792280005083136
author Gaudreault, Mathieu
Yeo, Adam
Kron, Tomas
Hanna, Gerard G.
Siva, Shankar
Hardcastle, Nicholas
author_facet Gaudreault, Mathieu
Yeo, Adam
Kron, Tomas
Hanna, Gerard G.
Siva, Shankar
Hardcastle, Nicholas
author_sort Gaudreault, Mathieu
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) delivered in a single fraction (SF) can be considered to have higher uncertainty given that the error probability is concentrated in a single session. This study aims to report the variation in technology and technique used and its effect on intrafraction motion based on a 10 years of experience in SF SABR. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Records of patients receiving SF SABR delivered at our instruction between 2010 and 2019 were included. Treatment parameters were extracted from the patient management database by using an in-house script. Treatment time was defined as the time difference between the first image acquisition to the last beam off of a single session. The intrafraction variation was measured from the 3-dimensional couch displacement measured after the first cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) acquired during a treatment. RESULTS: The number of SF SABR increased continuously from 2010 to 2019 and were mainly lung treatments. Treatment time was minimized by using volumetric modulated arc therapy, flattening filter-free dose rate, and coplanar field (24 ± 9 min). Treatment time increased as the number of CBCTs per session increased. The most common scenario involved both 2 and 3 CBCTs per session. On the average, a CBCT acquisition added 6 minutes to the treatment time. All treatments considered, the average intrafraction variation was 1.7 ± 1.6 mm. CONCLUSIONS: SF SABR usage increased with time in our institution. The intrafraction motion was acceptable and therefore a single fraction is an efficacious treatment option when considering SABR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9486429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94864292022-09-21 Treatment Time Optimization in Single Fraction Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy: A 10-Year Institutional Experience Gaudreault, Mathieu Yeo, Adam Kron, Tomas Hanna, Gerard G. Siva, Shankar Hardcastle, Nicholas Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) delivered in a single fraction (SF) can be considered to have higher uncertainty given that the error probability is concentrated in a single session. This study aims to report the variation in technology and technique used and its effect on intrafraction motion based on a 10 years of experience in SF SABR. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Records of patients receiving SF SABR delivered at our instruction between 2010 and 2019 were included. Treatment parameters were extracted from the patient management database by using an in-house script. Treatment time was defined as the time difference between the first image acquisition to the last beam off of a single session. The intrafraction variation was measured from the 3-dimensional couch displacement measured after the first cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) acquired during a treatment. RESULTS: The number of SF SABR increased continuously from 2010 to 2019 and were mainly lung treatments. Treatment time was minimized by using volumetric modulated arc therapy, flattening filter-free dose rate, and coplanar field (24 ± 9 min). Treatment time increased as the number of CBCTs per session increased. The most common scenario involved both 2 and 3 CBCTs per session. On the average, a CBCT acquisition added 6 minutes to the treatment time. All treatments considered, the average intrafraction variation was 1.7 ± 1.6 mm. CONCLUSIONS: SF SABR usage increased with time in our institution. The intrafraction motion was acceptable and therefore a single fraction is an efficacious treatment option when considering SABR. Elsevier 2022-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9486429/ /pubmed/36148377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2021.100829 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Scientific Article
Gaudreault, Mathieu
Yeo, Adam
Kron, Tomas
Hanna, Gerard G.
Siva, Shankar
Hardcastle, Nicholas
Treatment Time Optimization in Single Fraction Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy: A 10-Year Institutional Experience
title Treatment Time Optimization in Single Fraction Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy: A 10-Year Institutional Experience
title_full Treatment Time Optimization in Single Fraction Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy: A 10-Year Institutional Experience
title_fullStr Treatment Time Optimization in Single Fraction Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy: A 10-Year Institutional Experience
title_full_unstemmed Treatment Time Optimization in Single Fraction Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy: A 10-Year Institutional Experience
title_short Treatment Time Optimization in Single Fraction Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy: A 10-Year Institutional Experience
title_sort treatment time optimization in single fraction stereotactic ablative radiation therapy: a 10-year institutional experience
topic Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9486429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36148377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2021.100829
work_keys_str_mv AT gaudreaultmathieu treatmenttimeoptimizationinsinglefractionstereotacticablativeradiationtherapya10yearinstitutionalexperience
AT yeoadam treatmenttimeoptimizationinsinglefractionstereotacticablativeradiationtherapya10yearinstitutionalexperience
AT krontomas treatmenttimeoptimizationinsinglefractionstereotacticablativeradiationtherapya10yearinstitutionalexperience
AT hannagerardg treatmenttimeoptimizationinsinglefractionstereotacticablativeradiationtherapya10yearinstitutionalexperience
AT sivashankar treatmenttimeoptimizationinsinglefractionstereotacticablativeradiationtherapya10yearinstitutionalexperience
AT hardcastlenicholas treatmenttimeoptimizationinsinglefractionstereotacticablativeradiationtherapya10yearinstitutionalexperience