Cargando…
The inspection paradox: An important consideration in the evaluation of rotor lifetimes in cardiac fibrillation
Background and Objective: Renewal theory is a statistical approach to model the formation and destruction of phase singularities (PS), which occur at the pivots of spiral waves. A common issue arising during observation of renewal processes is an inspection paradox, due to oversampling of longer eve...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9486478/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36148313 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.920788 |
_version_ | 1784792290798075904 |
---|---|
author | Jenkins, Evan V. Dharmaprani, Dhani Schopp, Madeline Quah, Jing Xian Tiver, Kathryn Mitchell, Lewis Xiong, Feng Aguilar, Martin Pope, Kenneth Akar, Fadi G. Roney, Caroline H. Niederer, Steven A. Nattel, Stanley Nash, Martyn P. Clayton, Richard H. Ganesan, Anand N. |
author_facet | Jenkins, Evan V. Dharmaprani, Dhani Schopp, Madeline Quah, Jing Xian Tiver, Kathryn Mitchell, Lewis Xiong, Feng Aguilar, Martin Pope, Kenneth Akar, Fadi G. Roney, Caroline H. Niederer, Steven A. Nattel, Stanley Nash, Martyn P. Clayton, Richard H. Ganesan, Anand N. |
author_sort | Jenkins, Evan V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and Objective: Renewal theory is a statistical approach to model the formation and destruction of phase singularities (PS), which occur at the pivots of spiral waves. A common issue arising during observation of renewal processes is an inspection paradox, due to oversampling of longer events. The objective of this study was to characterise the effect of a potential inspection paradox on the perception of PS lifetimes in cardiac fibrillation. Methods: A multisystem, multi-modality study was performed, examining computational simulations (Aliev-Panfilov (APV) model, Courtmanche-Nattel model), experimentally acquired optical mapping Atrial and Ventricular Fibrillation (AF/VF) data, and clinically acquired human AF and VF. Distributions of all PS lifetimes across full epochs of AF, VF, or computational simulations, were compared with distributions formed from lifetimes of PS existing at 10,000 simulated commencement timepoints. Results: In all systems, an inspection paradox led towards oversampling of PS with longer lifetimes. In APV computational simulations there was a mean PS lifetime shift of +84.9% (95% CI, ± 0.3%) (p < 0.001 for observed vs overall), in Courtmanche-Nattel simulations of AF +692.9% (95% CI, ±57.7%) (p < 0.001), in optically mapped rat AF +374.6% (95% CI, [Formula: see text] 88.5%) (p = 0.052), in human AF mapped with basket catheters +129.2% (95% CI, ±4.1%) (p < 0.05), human AF-HD grid catheters 150.8% (95% CI, [Formula: see text] 9.0%) (p < 0.001), in optically mapped rat VF +171.3% (95% CI, ±15.6%) (p < 0.001), in human epicardial VF 153.5% (95% CI, ±15.7%) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Visual inspection of phase movies has the potential to systematically oversample longer lasting PS, due to an inspection paradox. An inspection paradox is minimised by consideration of the overall distribution of PS lifetimes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9486478 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94864782022-09-21 The inspection paradox: An important consideration in the evaluation of rotor lifetimes in cardiac fibrillation Jenkins, Evan V. Dharmaprani, Dhani Schopp, Madeline Quah, Jing Xian Tiver, Kathryn Mitchell, Lewis Xiong, Feng Aguilar, Martin Pope, Kenneth Akar, Fadi G. Roney, Caroline H. Niederer, Steven A. Nattel, Stanley Nash, Martyn P. Clayton, Richard H. Ganesan, Anand N. Front Physiol Physiology Background and Objective: Renewal theory is a statistical approach to model the formation and destruction of phase singularities (PS), which occur at the pivots of spiral waves. A common issue arising during observation of renewal processes is an inspection paradox, due to oversampling of longer events. The objective of this study was to characterise the effect of a potential inspection paradox on the perception of PS lifetimes in cardiac fibrillation. Methods: A multisystem, multi-modality study was performed, examining computational simulations (Aliev-Panfilov (APV) model, Courtmanche-Nattel model), experimentally acquired optical mapping Atrial and Ventricular Fibrillation (AF/VF) data, and clinically acquired human AF and VF. Distributions of all PS lifetimes across full epochs of AF, VF, or computational simulations, were compared with distributions formed from lifetimes of PS existing at 10,000 simulated commencement timepoints. Results: In all systems, an inspection paradox led towards oversampling of PS with longer lifetimes. In APV computational simulations there was a mean PS lifetime shift of +84.9% (95% CI, ± 0.3%) (p < 0.001 for observed vs overall), in Courtmanche-Nattel simulations of AF +692.9% (95% CI, ±57.7%) (p < 0.001), in optically mapped rat AF +374.6% (95% CI, [Formula: see text] 88.5%) (p = 0.052), in human AF mapped with basket catheters +129.2% (95% CI, ±4.1%) (p < 0.05), human AF-HD grid catheters 150.8% (95% CI, [Formula: see text] 9.0%) (p < 0.001), in optically mapped rat VF +171.3% (95% CI, ±15.6%) (p < 0.001), in human epicardial VF 153.5% (95% CI, ±15.7%) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Visual inspection of phase movies has the potential to systematically oversample longer lasting PS, due to an inspection paradox. An inspection paradox is minimised by consideration of the overall distribution of PS lifetimes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9486478/ /pubmed/36148313 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.920788 Text en Copyright © 2022 Jenkins, Dharmaprani, Schopp, Quah, Tiver, Mitchell, Xiong, Aguilar, Pope, Akar, Roney, Niederer, Nattel, Nash, Clayton and Ganesan. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Physiology Jenkins, Evan V. Dharmaprani, Dhani Schopp, Madeline Quah, Jing Xian Tiver, Kathryn Mitchell, Lewis Xiong, Feng Aguilar, Martin Pope, Kenneth Akar, Fadi G. Roney, Caroline H. Niederer, Steven A. Nattel, Stanley Nash, Martyn P. Clayton, Richard H. Ganesan, Anand N. The inspection paradox: An important consideration in the evaluation of rotor lifetimes in cardiac fibrillation |
title | The inspection paradox: An important consideration in the evaluation of rotor lifetimes in cardiac fibrillation |
title_full | The inspection paradox: An important consideration in the evaluation of rotor lifetimes in cardiac fibrillation |
title_fullStr | The inspection paradox: An important consideration in the evaluation of rotor lifetimes in cardiac fibrillation |
title_full_unstemmed | The inspection paradox: An important consideration in the evaluation of rotor lifetimes in cardiac fibrillation |
title_short | The inspection paradox: An important consideration in the evaluation of rotor lifetimes in cardiac fibrillation |
title_sort | inspection paradox: an important consideration in the evaluation of rotor lifetimes in cardiac fibrillation |
topic | Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9486478/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36148313 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.920788 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jenkinsevanv theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation AT dharmapranidhani theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation AT schoppmadeline theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation AT quahjingxian theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation AT tiverkathryn theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation AT mitchelllewis theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation AT xiongfeng theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation AT aguilarmartin theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation AT popekenneth theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation AT akarfadig theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation AT roneycarolineh theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation AT niedererstevena theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation AT nattelstanley theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation AT nashmartynp theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation AT claytonrichardh theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation AT ganesananandn theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation AT jenkinsevanv inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation AT dharmapranidhani inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation AT schoppmadeline inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation AT quahjingxian inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation AT tiverkathryn inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation AT mitchelllewis inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation AT xiongfeng inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation AT aguilarmartin inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation AT popekenneth inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation AT akarfadig inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation AT roneycarolineh inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation AT niedererstevena inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation AT nattelstanley inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation AT nashmartynp inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation AT claytonrichardh inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation AT ganesananandn inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation |