Cargando…

The inspection paradox: An important consideration in the evaluation of rotor lifetimes in cardiac fibrillation

Background and Objective: Renewal theory is a statistical approach to model the formation and destruction of phase singularities (PS), which occur at the pivots of spiral waves. A common issue arising during observation of renewal processes is an inspection paradox, due to oversampling of longer eve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jenkins, Evan V., Dharmaprani, Dhani, Schopp, Madeline, Quah, Jing Xian, Tiver, Kathryn, Mitchell, Lewis, Xiong, Feng, Aguilar, Martin, Pope, Kenneth, Akar, Fadi G., Roney, Caroline H., Niederer, Steven A., Nattel, Stanley, Nash, Martyn P., Clayton, Richard H., Ganesan, Anand N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9486478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36148313
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.920788
_version_ 1784792290798075904
author Jenkins, Evan V.
Dharmaprani, Dhani
Schopp, Madeline
Quah, Jing Xian
Tiver, Kathryn
Mitchell, Lewis
Xiong, Feng
Aguilar, Martin
Pope, Kenneth
Akar, Fadi G.
Roney, Caroline H.
Niederer, Steven A.
Nattel, Stanley
Nash, Martyn P.
Clayton, Richard H.
Ganesan, Anand N.
author_facet Jenkins, Evan V.
Dharmaprani, Dhani
Schopp, Madeline
Quah, Jing Xian
Tiver, Kathryn
Mitchell, Lewis
Xiong, Feng
Aguilar, Martin
Pope, Kenneth
Akar, Fadi G.
Roney, Caroline H.
Niederer, Steven A.
Nattel, Stanley
Nash, Martyn P.
Clayton, Richard H.
Ganesan, Anand N.
author_sort Jenkins, Evan V.
collection PubMed
description Background and Objective: Renewal theory is a statistical approach to model the formation and destruction of phase singularities (PS), which occur at the pivots of spiral waves. A common issue arising during observation of renewal processes is an inspection paradox, due to oversampling of longer events. The objective of this study was to characterise the effect of a potential inspection paradox on the perception of PS lifetimes in cardiac fibrillation. Methods: A multisystem, multi-modality study was performed, examining computational simulations (Aliev-Panfilov (APV) model, Courtmanche-Nattel model), experimentally acquired optical mapping Atrial and Ventricular Fibrillation (AF/VF) data, and clinically acquired human AF and VF. Distributions of all PS lifetimes across full epochs of AF, VF, or computational simulations, were compared with distributions formed from lifetimes of PS existing at 10,000 simulated commencement timepoints. Results: In all systems, an inspection paradox led towards oversampling of PS with longer lifetimes. In APV computational simulations there was a mean PS lifetime shift of +84.9% (95% CI, ± 0.3%) (p < 0.001 for observed vs overall), in Courtmanche-Nattel simulations of AF +692.9% (95% CI, ±57.7%) (p < 0.001), in optically mapped rat AF +374.6% (95% CI, [Formula: see text] 88.5%) (p = 0.052), in human AF mapped with basket catheters +129.2% (95% CI, ±4.1%) (p < 0.05), human AF-HD grid catheters 150.8% (95% CI, [Formula: see text] 9.0%) (p < 0.001), in optically mapped rat VF +171.3% (95% CI, ±15.6%) (p < 0.001), in human epicardial VF 153.5% (95% CI, ±15.7%) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Visual inspection of phase movies has the potential to systematically oversample longer lasting PS, due to an inspection paradox. An inspection paradox is minimised by consideration of the overall distribution of PS lifetimes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9486478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94864782022-09-21 The inspection paradox: An important consideration in the evaluation of rotor lifetimes in cardiac fibrillation Jenkins, Evan V. Dharmaprani, Dhani Schopp, Madeline Quah, Jing Xian Tiver, Kathryn Mitchell, Lewis Xiong, Feng Aguilar, Martin Pope, Kenneth Akar, Fadi G. Roney, Caroline H. Niederer, Steven A. Nattel, Stanley Nash, Martyn P. Clayton, Richard H. Ganesan, Anand N. Front Physiol Physiology Background and Objective: Renewal theory is a statistical approach to model the formation and destruction of phase singularities (PS), which occur at the pivots of spiral waves. A common issue arising during observation of renewal processes is an inspection paradox, due to oversampling of longer events. The objective of this study was to characterise the effect of a potential inspection paradox on the perception of PS lifetimes in cardiac fibrillation. Methods: A multisystem, multi-modality study was performed, examining computational simulations (Aliev-Panfilov (APV) model, Courtmanche-Nattel model), experimentally acquired optical mapping Atrial and Ventricular Fibrillation (AF/VF) data, and clinically acquired human AF and VF. Distributions of all PS lifetimes across full epochs of AF, VF, or computational simulations, were compared with distributions formed from lifetimes of PS existing at 10,000 simulated commencement timepoints. Results: In all systems, an inspection paradox led towards oversampling of PS with longer lifetimes. In APV computational simulations there was a mean PS lifetime shift of +84.9% (95% CI, ± 0.3%) (p < 0.001 for observed vs overall), in Courtmanche-Nattel simulations of AF +692.9% (95% CI, ±57.7%) (p < 0.001), in optically mapped rat AF +374.6% (95% CI, [Formula: see text] 88.5%) (p = 0.052), in human AF mapped with basket catheters +129.2% (95% CI, ±4.1%) (p < 0.05), human AF-HD grid catheters 150.8% (95% CI, [Formula: see text] 9.0%) (p < 0.001), in optically mapped rat VF +171.3% (95% CI, ±15.6%) (p < 0.001), in human epicardial VF 153.5% (95% CI, ±15.7%) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Visual inspection of phase movies has the potential to systematically oversample longer lasting PS, due to an inspection paradox. An inspection paradox is minimised by consideration of the overall distribution of PS lifetimes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9486478/ /pubmed/36148313 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.920788 Text en Copyright © 2022 Jenkins, Dharmaprani, Schopp, Quah, Tiver, Mitchell, Xiong, Aguilar, Pope, Akar, Roney, Niederer, Nattel, Nash, Clayton and Ganesan. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Jenkins, Evan V.
Dharmaprani, Dhani
Schopp, Madeline
Quah, Jing Xian
Tiver, Kathryn
Mitchell, Lewis
Xiong, Feng
Aguilar, Martin
Pope, Kenneth
Akar, Fadi G.
Roney, Caroline H.
Niederer, Steven A.
Nattel, Stanley
Nash, Martyn P.
Clayton, Richard H.
Ganesan, Anand N.
The inspection paradox: An important consideration in the evaluation of rotor lifetimes in cardiac fibrillation
title The inspection paradox: An important consideration in the evaluation of rotor lifetimes in cardiac fibrillation
title_full The inspection paradox: An important consideration in the evaluation of rotor lifetimes in cardiac fibrillation
title_fullStr The inspection paradox: An important consideration in the evaluation of rotor lifetimes in cardiac fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed The inspection paradox: An important consideration in the evaluation of rotor lifetimes in cardiac fibrillation
title_short The inspection paradox: An important consideration in the evaluation of rotor lifetimes in cardiac fibrillation
title_sort inspection paradox: an important consideration in the evaluation of rotor lifetimes in cardiac fibrillation
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9486478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36148313
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.920788
work_keys_str_mv AT jenkinsevanv theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation
AT dharmapranidhani theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation
AT schoppmadeline theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation
AT quahjingxian theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation
AT tiverkathryn theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation
AT mitchelllewis theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation
AT xiongfeng theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation
AT aguilarmartin theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation
AT popekenneth theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation
AT akarfadig theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation
AT roneycarolineh theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation
AT niedererstevena theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation
AT nattelstanley theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation
AT nashmartynp theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation
AT claytonrichardh theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation
AT ganesananandn theinspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation
AT jenkinsevanv inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation
AT dharmapranidhani inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation
AT schoppmadeline inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation
AT quahjingxian inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation
AT tiverkathryn inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation
AT mitchelllewis inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation
AT xiongfeng inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation
AT aguilarmartin inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation
AT popekenneth inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation
AT akarfadig inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation
AT roneycarolineh inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation
AT niedererstevena inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation
AT nattelstanley inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation
AT nashmartynp inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation
AT claytonrichardh inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation
AT ganesananandn inspectionparadoxanimportantconsiderationintheevaluationofrotorlifetimesincardiacfibrillation