Cargando…

Prospective Optimization of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Lymph Node Assessment for Lung Cancer: Three Needle Agitations Are Noninferior to 10 Agitations for Adequate Tumor Cell and DNA Yield

INTRODUCTION: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS TBNA) is an important means of obtaining a tissue for advanced lung cancer. Optimizing the EBUS TBNA needling technique is important to maintain procedural simplicity and maximize sample quality for emerging molecul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fielding, David, Dalley, Andrew J., Singh, Mahendra, Nandakumar, Lakshmy, Nones, Katia, Lakis, Vanessa, Chittoory, Haarika, Ferguson, Kaltin, Bashirzadeh, Farzad, Bint, Michael, Pahoff, Carl, Son, Jung Hwa, Hodgson, Alan, Sharma, Sowmya, Godbolt, David, Coleman, Kylie, Whitfield, Lenore, Waddell, Nicola, Lakhani, Sunil R., Hartel, Gunter, Simpson, Peter T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9486562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36147610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100403
_version_ 1784792310468313088
author Fielding, David
Dalley, Andrew J.
Singh, Mahendra
Nandakumar, Lakshmy
Nones, Katia
Lakis, Vanessa
Chittoory, Haarika
Ferguson, Kaltin
Bashirzadeh, Farzad
Bint, Michael
Pahoff, Carl
Son, Jung Hwa
Hodgson, Alan
Sharma, Sowmya
Godbolt, David
Coleman, Kylie
Whitfield, Lenore
Waddell, Nicola
Lakhani, Sunil R.
Hartel, Gunter
Simpson, Peter T.
author_facet Fielding, David
Dalley, Andrew J.
Singh, Mahendra
Nandakumar, Lakshmy
Nones, Katia
Lakis, Vanessa
Chittoory, Haarika
Ferguson, Kaltin
Bashirzadeh, Farzad
Bint, Michael
Pahoff, Carl
Son, Jung Hwa
Hodgson, Alan
Sharma, Sowmya
Godbolt, David
Coleman, Kylie
Whitfield, Lenore
Waddell, Nicola
Lakhani, Sunil R.
Hartel, Gunter
Simpson, Peter T.
author_sort Fielding, David
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS TBNA) is an important means of obtaining a tissue for advanced lung cancer. Optimizing the EBUS TBNA needling technique is important to maintain procedural simplicity and maximize sample quality for emerging molecular diagnostics. METHODS: We prospectively explored three versus 10 agitations of the needle in sequential passes into the lymph node using separate needles. Resulting Diff-Quik cytology smears were quantitatively assessed using microscopic (tumor cell cellularity, abundance scores, erythrocyte contamination) and DNA yields. Microscopy was reported by two cytopathologists, and an inter-rater assessment was made by four additional cytopathologists. RESULTS: In 86 patients confirmed as having malignant disease by EBUS TBNA (45 males, 41 females), a mean of 5.3 smears were made per patient with a total of 459 smears scored by pathologists and 168 paired smears extracted for DNA. There was no significant difference between three versus 10 agitations for smear cellularity (p = 0.44), DNA yield (p = 0.84), or DNA integrity (p = 0.20), but there was significantly less contamination by erythrocytes from three agitations (chi-square p = 0.008). There was significantly more DNA in the first pass into the node using three agitations than with other passes and with 10 agitations (pass × agitations interaction, p = 0.031). Reviewing pathologists correctly classified smears as more than or equal to 25% cellularity 86.3% of the time (κ = 0.63 [95% confidence interval: 0.55–0.71]). CONCLUSIONS: Three agitations are noninferior to 10 agitations for overall abundance of malignant cells and DNA content on smears. A smear with adequate DNA for panel sequencing could almost always be made with the first needle pass using three agitations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9486562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94865622022-09-21 Prospective Optimization of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Lymph Node Assessment for Lung Cancer: Three Needle Agitations Are Noninferior to 10 Agitations for Adequate Tumor Cell and DNA Yield Fielding, David Dalley, Andrew J. Singh, Mahendra Nandakumar, Lakshmy Nones, Katia Lakis, Vanessa Chittoory, Haarika Ferguson, Kaltin Bashirzadeh, Farzad Bint, Michael Pahoff, Carl Son, Jung Hwa Hodgson, Alan Sharma, Sowmya Godbolt, David Coleman, Kylie Whitfield, Lenore Waddell, Nicola Lakhani, Sunil R. Hartel, Gunter Simpson, Peter T. JTO Clin Res Rep Original Article INTRODUCTION: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS TBNA) is an important means of obtaining a tissue for advanced lung cancer. Optimizing the EBUS TBNA needling technique is important to maintain procedural simplicity and maximize sample quality for emerging molecular diagnostics. METHODS: We prospectively explored three versus 10 agitations of the needle in sequential passes into the lymph node using separate needles. Resulting Diff-Quik cytology smears were quantitatively assessed using microscopic (tumor cell cellularity, abundance scores, erythrocyte contamination) and DNA yields. Microscopy was reported by two cytopathologists, and an inter-rater assessment was made by four additional cytopathologists. RESULTS: In 86 patients confirmed as having malignant disease by EBUS TBNA (45 males, 41 females), a mean of 5.3 smears were made per patient with a total of 459 smears scored by pathologists and 168 paired smears extracted for DNA. There was no significant difference between three versus 10 agitations for smear cellularity (p = 0.44), DNA yield (p = 0.84), or DNA integrity (p = 0.20), but there was significantly less contamination by erythrocytes from three agitations (chi-square p = 0.008). There was significantly more DNA in the first pass into the node using three agitations than with other passes and with 10 agitations (pass × agitations interaction, p = 0.031). Reviewing pathologists correctly classified smears as more than or equal to 25% cellularity 86.3% of the time (κ = 0.63 [95% confidence interval: 0.55–0.71]). CONCLUSIONS: Three agitations are noninferior to 10 agitations for overall abundance of malignant cells and DNA content on smears. A smear with adequate DNA for panel sequencing could almost always be made with the first needle pass using three agitations. Elsevier 2022-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9486562/ /pubmed/36147610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100403 Text en Crown Copyright © 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the AGA Institute. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Fielding, David
Dalley, Andrew J.
Singh, Mahendra
Nandakumar, Lakshmy
Nones, Katia
Lakis, Vanessa
Chittoory, Haarika
Ferguson, Kaltin
Bashirzadeh, Farzad
Bint, Michael
Pahoff, Carl
Son, Jung Hwa
Hodgson, Alan
Sharma, Sowmya
Godbolt, David
Coleman, Kylie
Whitfield, Lenore
Waddell, Nicola
Lakhani, Sunil R.
Hartel, Gunter
Simpson, Peter T.
Prospective Optimization of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Lymph Node Assessment for Lung Cancer: Three Needle Agitations Are Noninferior to 10 Agitations for Adequate Tumor Cell and DNA Yield
title Prospective Optimization of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Lymph Node Assessment for Lung Cancer: Three Needle Agitations Are Noninferior to 10 Agitations for Adequate Tumor Cell and DNA Yield
title_full Prospective Optimization of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Lymph Node Assessment for Lung Cancer: Three Needle Agitations Are Noninferior to 10 Agitations for Adequate Tumor Cell and DNA Yield
title_fullStr Prospective Optimization of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Lymph Node Assessment for Lung Cancer: Three Needle Agitations Are Noninferior to 10 Agitations for Adequate Tumor Cell and DNA Yield
title_full_unstemmed Prospective Optimization of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Lymph Node Assessment for Lung Cancer: Three Needle Agitations Are Noninferior to 10 Agitations for Adequate Tumor Cell and DNA Yield
title_short Prospective Optimization of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Lymph Node Assessment for Lung Cancer: Three Needle Agitations Are Noninferior to 10 Agitations for Adequate Tumor Cell and DNA Yield
title_sort prospective optimization of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration lymph node assessment for lung cancer: three needle agitations are noninferior to 10 agitations for adequate tumor cell and dna yield
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9486562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36147610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100403
work_keys_str_mv AT fieldingdavid prospectiveoptimizationofendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationlymphnodeassessmentforlungcancerthreeneedleagitationsarenoninferiorto10agitationsforadequatetumorcellanddnayield
AT dalleyandrewj prospectiveoptimizationofendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationlymphnodeassessmentforlungcancerthreeneedleagitationsarenoninferiorto10agitationsforadequatetumorcellanddnayield
AT singhmahendra prospectiveoptimizationofendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationlymphnodeassessmentforlungcancerthreeneedleagitationsarenoninferiorto10agitationsforadequatetumorcellanddnayield
AT nandakumarlakshmy prospectiveoptimizationofendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationlymphnodeassessmentforlungcancerthreeneedleagitationsarenoninferiorto10agitationsforadequatetumorcellanddnayield
AT noneskatia prospectiveoptimizationofendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationlymphnodeassessmentforlungcancerthreeneedleagitationsarenoninferiorto10agitationsforadequatetumorcellanddnayield
AT lakisvanessa prospectiveoptimizationofendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationlymphnodeassessmentforlungcancerthreeneedleagitationsarenoninferiorto10agitationsforadequatetumorcellanddnayield
AT chittooryhaarika prospectiveoptimizationofendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationlymphnodeassessmentforlungcancerthreeneedleagitationsarenoninferiorto10agitationsforadequatetumorcellanddnayield
AT fergusonkaltin prospectiveoptimizationofendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationlymphnodeassessmentforlungcancerthreeneedleagitationsarenoninferiorto10agitationsforadequatetumorcellanddnayield
AT bashirzadehfarzad prospectiveoptimizationofendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationlymphnodeassessmentforlungcancerthreeneedleagitationsarenoninferiorto10agitationsforadequatetumorcellanddnayield
AT bintmichael prospectiveoptimizationofendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationlymphnodeassessmentforlungcancerthreeneedleagitationsarenoninferiorto10agitationsforadequatetumorcellanddnayield
AT pahoffcarl prospectiveoptimizationofendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationlymphnodeassessmentforlungcancerthreeneedleagitationsarenoninferiorto10agitationsforadequatetumorcellanddnayield
AT sonjunghwa prospectiveoptimizationofendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationlymphnodeassessmentforlungcancerthreeneedleagitationsarenoninferiorto10agitationsforadequatetumorcellanddnayield
AT hodgsonalan prospectiveoptimizationofendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationlymphnodeassessmentforlungcancerthreeneedleagitationsarenoninferiorto10agitationsforadequatetumorcellanddnayield
AT sharmasowmya prospectiveoptimizationofendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationlymphnodeassessmentforlungcancerthreeneedleagitationsarenoninferiorto10agitationsforadequatetumorcellanddnayield
AT godboltdavid prospectiveoptimizationofendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationlymphnodeassessmentforlungcancerthreeneedleagitationsarenoninferiorto10agitationsforadequatetumorcellanddnayield
AT colemankylie prospectiveoptimizationofendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationlymphnodeassessmentforlungcancerthreeneedleagitationsarenoninferiorto10agitationsforadequatetumorcellanddnayield
AT whitfieldlenore prospectiveoptimizationofendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationlymphnodeassessmentforlungcancerthreeneedleagitationsarenoninferiorto10agitationsforadequatetumorcellanddnayield
AT waddellnicola prospectiveoptimizationofendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationlymphnodeassessmentforlungcancerthreeneedleagitationsarenoninferiorto10agitationsforadequatetumorcellanddnayield
AT lakhanisunilr prospectiveoptimizationofendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationlymphnodeassessmentforlungcancerthreeneedleagitationsarenoninferiorto10agitationsforadequatetumorcellanddnayield
AT hartelgunter prospectiveoptimizationofendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationlymphnodeassessmentforlungcancerthreeneedleagitationsarenoninferiorto10agitationsforadequatetumorcellanddnayield
AT simpsonpetert prospectiveoptimizationofendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationlymphnodeassessmentforlungcancerthreeneedleagitationsarenoninferiorto10agitationsforadequatetumorcellanddnayield