Cargando…
Landscape, barriers, and facilitators of scientific productivity in schizophrenia research in Southeast Asia: A bibliometric analysis
BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia research has significantly grown in the past years. However, there is no comprehensive evaluation of schizophrenia research publications from Southeast Asia (SEA). Thus, this study determined the characteristics and trends of published articles about schizophrenia in SEA th...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9486613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36147134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104330 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia research has significantly grown in the past years. However, there is no comprehensive evaluation of schizophrenia research publications from Southeast Asia (SEA). Thus, this study determined the characteristics and trends of published articles about schizophrenia in SEA through a bibliometric analysis. METHODS: A database search on schizophrenia research in SEA countries was performed using the Scopus databases from 1973 to 2021. Bibliometric information was obtained from Scopus, and network visualization was conducted using VOSviewer software. RESULTS: There were 1068 articles on schizophrenia from SEA from 1973 until 2021. Schizophrenia research outputs from SEA started to increase from 2000 onwards. Singapore, Malaysia, and Thailand were the most productive countries in schizophrenia research and had the most collaborations. Most schizophrenia research in SEA was published in Asia- or SEA-based journals. The research hotspots for schizophrenia in SEA included treatment, pathophysiology, symptomatology, and psychological and social aspects of schizophrenia. Lastly, correlation analysis showed that gross domestic product per capita, research and development (R&D) expenditures, number of researchers in R&D, number of physicians, and international research collaborations were significantly correlated with higher research productivity and scientific impact in schizophrenia research. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study showed the trends and gaps for research in SEA and the socioeconomic factors correlated with research productivity for schizophrenia in SEA. This study emphasized increasing financial support and collaborations for schizophrenia research to improve research productivity in schizophrenia in the SEA region. |
---|