Cargando…

The induced membrane technique: A therapeutic option for managing bone defects in the upper extremity: Case series for 7 patients

INTRODUCTION: The reconstruction of bone defects of tumoral, infectious or traumatic origin of the limbs remains a major therapeutic challenge for the orthopedic surgeon and the patient, in terms of anatomical and functional results. CASES PRESENTATION: We report the case of 7 patients who underwent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El Farhaoui, Amine, Benalia, Kamal, Lachkar, Adnane, abdeljaouad, Najib, Yacoubi, Hicham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9486742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36147123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104533
_version_ 1784792344744165376
author El Farhaoui, Amine
Benalia, Kamal
Lachkar, Adnane
abdeljaouad, Najib
Yacoubi, Hicham
author_facet El Farhaoui, Amine
Benalia, Kamal
Lachkar, Adnane
abdeljaouad, Najib
Yacoubi, Hicham
author_sort El Farhaoui, Amine
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The reconstruction of bone defects of tumoral, infectious or traumatic origin of the limbs remains a major therapeutic challenge for the orthopedic surgeon and the patient, in terms of anatomical and functional results. CASES PRESENTATION: We report the case of 7 patients who underwent induced membrane bone reconstruction of the upper extremity, 5 patients with initial injury to the forearm, and 2 of our patients, to the humerus. In terms of function, the range of prono-supination was 125°, the range of wrist flexion-extension was 165°, and the range of elbow mobility was 170°. All patients achieved union at the time of the last follow-up. Two patients achieved union at 6 months, one patient at 5 months, one patient at 4 months, and three patients at 3 months. DISCUSSION: The induced membrane (IM) technique has been used for more than 30 years, and it's more and more widely accepted all over the world, as a simple and effective technique for reconstruction of segmental bone defects. The technique comprises 2 surgical stages, The first step involves the total excision of infected and non-viable lesions both bone and soft tissue until tissue with optimal vascularization "Paprika sign", then the strict instrumental stabilization of the skeleton and the realization of a covering flap if necessary, depending on the site of the initial injury initial lesion and the extent of the resection. CONCLUSION: The technique of induced membrane has proven its effectiveness in the management of bone loss.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9486742
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94867422022-09-21 The induced membrane technique: A therapeutic option for managing bone defects in the upper extremity: Case series for 7 patients El Farhaoui, Amine Benalia, Kamal Lachkar, Adnane abdeljaouad, Najib Yacoubi, Hicham Ann Med Surg (Lond) Case Series INTRODUCTION: The reconstruction of bone defects of tumoral, infectious or traumatic origin of the limbs remains a major therapeutic challenge for the orthopedic surgeon and the patient, in terms of anatomical and functional results. CASES PRESENTATION: We report the case of 7 patients who underwent induced membrane bone reconstruction of the upper extremity, 5 patients with initial injury to the forearm, and 2 of our patients, to the humerus. In terms of function, the range of prono-supination was 125°, the range of wrist flexion-extension was 165°, and the range of elbow mobility was 170°. All patients achieved union at the time of the last follow-up. Two patients achieved union at 6 months, one patient at 5 months, one patient at 4 months, and three patients at 3 months. DISCUSSION: The induced membrane (IM) technique has been used for more than 30 years, and it's more and more widely accepted all over the world, as a simple and effective technique for reconstruction of segmental bone defects. The technique comprises 2 surgical stages, The first step involves the total excision of infected and non-viable lesions both bone and soft tissue until tissue with optimal vascularization "Paprika sign", then the strict instrumental stabilization of the skeleton and the realization of a covering flap if necessary, depending on the site of the initial injury initial lesion and the extent of the resection. CONCLUSION: The technique of induced membrane has proven its effectiveness in the management of bone loss. Elsevier 2022-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9486742/ /pubmed/36147123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104533 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Series
El Farhaoui, Amine
Benalia, Kamal
Lachkar, Adnane
abdeljaouad, Najib
Yacoubi, Hicham
The induced membrane technique: A therapeutic option for managing bone defects in the upper extremity: Case series for 7 patients
title The induced membrane technique: A therapeutic option for managing bone defects in the upper extremity: Case series for 7 patients
title_full The induced membrane technique: A therapeutic option for managing bone defects in the upper extremity: Case series for 7 patients
title_fullStr The induced membrane technique: A therapeutic option for managing bone defects in the upper extremity: Case series for 7 patients
title_full_unstemmed The induced membrane technique: A therapeutic option for managing bone defects in the upper extremity: Case series for 7 patients
title_short The induced membrane technique: A therapeutic option for managing bone defects in the upper extremity: Case series for 7 patients
title_sort induced membrane technique: a therapeutic option for managing bone defects in the upper extremity: case series for 7 patients
topic Case Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9486742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36147123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104533
work_keys_str_mv AT elfarhaouiamine theinducedmembranetechniqueatherapeuticoptionformanagingbonedefectsintheupperextremitycaseseriesfor7patients
AT benaliakamal theinducedmembranetechniqueatherapeuticoptionformanagingbonedefectsintheupperextremitycaseseriesfor7patients
AT lachkaradnane theinducedmembranetechniqueatherapeuticoptionformanagingbonedefectsintheupperextremitycaseseriesfor7patients
AT abdeljaouadnajib theinducedmembranetechniqueatherapeuticoptionformanagingbonedefectsintheupperextremitycaseseriesfor7patients
AT yacoubihicham theinducedmembranetechniqueatherapeuticoptionformanagingbonedefectsintheupperextremitycaseseriesfor7patients
AT elfarhaouiamine inducedmembranetechniqueatherapeuticoptionformanagingbonedefectsintheupperextremitycaseseriesfor7patients
AT benaliakamal inducedmembranetechniqueatherapeuticoptionformanagingbonedefectsintheupperextremitycaseseriesfor7patients
AT lachkaradnane inducedmembranetechniqueatherapeuticoptionformanagingbonedefectsintheupperextremitycaseseriesfor7patients
AT abdeljaouadnajib inducedmembranetechniqueatherapeuticoptionformanagingbonedefectsintheupperextremitycaseseriesfor7patients
AT yacoubihicham inducedmembranetechniqueatherapeuticoptionformanagingbonedefectsintheupperextremitycaseseriesfor7patients