Cargando…

Improving the accuracy of self-reported height and weight in surveys: an experimental study

BACKGROUND: Many studies rely on self-reported height and weight. While a substantial body of literature exists on misreporting of height and weight, little exists on improving accuracy. The aim of this study was to determine, using an experimental design and a comparative approach, whether the accu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Dyke, Nina, Drinkwater, Eric J., Rachele, Jerome N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9487130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36123633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01690-x
_version_ 1784792427704352768
author Van Dyke, Nina
Drinkwater, Eric J.
Rachele, Jerome N.
author_facet Van Dyke, Nina
Drinkwater, Eric J.
Rachele, Jerome N.
author_sort Van Dyke, Nina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many studies rely on self-reported height and weight. While a substantial body of literature exists on misreporting of height and weight, little exists on improving accuracy. The aim of this study was to determine, using an experimental design and a comparative approach, whether the accuracy of self-reported height and weight data can be increased by improving how these questions are asked in surveys, drawing on the relevant evidence from the psychology and survey research literatures. METHODS: Two surveys from two separate studies were used to test our hypotheses (Science Survey, n = 1,200; Eating Behaviours Survey, n = 200). Participants were randomly assigned to one of six conditions, four of which were designed to improve the accuracy of the self-reported height and weight data (“preamble”), and two of which served as the control conditions ( “no preamble”). Four hypotheses were tested: (H1) survey participants read a preamble prior to being asked their height and weight will report lower heights and higher weights than those not read a preamble; (H2) the impact of question-wording (i.e., preamble vs. no preamble) on self-reported weight will be greater for participants with higher BMIs; (H3) the impact of question-wording on height will be greater for older participants; (H4) either version of the weight question – standard or “weight-specific”—may result in participants reporting more accurate self-reported weight. One-way MANOVA was conducted to test Hypothesis 1; two-way analysis of variance were conducted to test Hypothesis 2; moderation analysis was used to test Hypothesis 3; independent samples t-test was conducted to test Hypothesis 4. RESULTS: None of the hypotheses was supported. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides an important starting point from which to inform further work exploring how question wording can improve self-reported measurement of height and weight. Future research should explore how question preambles may or may not operationalise hypothesised underlying mechanisms, the sensitivity or intrusiveness of height and weight questions, individual beliefs about one’s height and weight, and survey context.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9487130
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94871302022-09-21 Improving the accuracy of self-reported height and weight in surveys: an experimental study Van Dyke, Nina Drinkwater, Eric J. Rachele, Jerome N. BMC Med Res Methodol Research BACKGROUND: Many studies rely on self-reported height and weight. While a substantial body of literature exists on misreporting of height and weight, little exists on improving accuracy. The aim of this study was to determine, using an experimental design and a comparative approach, whether the accuracy of self-reported height and weight data can be increased by improving how these questions are asked in surveys, drawing on the relevant evidence from the psychology and survey research literatures. METHODS: Two surveys from two separate studies were used to test our hypotheses (Science Survey, n = 1,200; Eating Behaviours Survey, n = 200). Participants were randomly assigned to one of six conditions, four of which were designed to improve the accuracy of the self-reported height and weight data (“preamble”), and two of which served as the control conditions ( “no preamble”). Four hypotheses were tested: (H1) survey participants read a preamble prior to being asked their height and weight will report lower heights and higher weights than those not read a preamble; (H2) the impact of question-wording (i.e., preamble vs. no preamble) on self-reported weight will be greater for participants with higher BMIs; (H3) the impact of question-wording on height will be greater for older participants; (H4) either version of the weight question – standard or “weight-specific”—may result in participants reporting more accurate self-reported weight. One-way MANOVA was conducted to test Hypothesis 1; two-way analysis of variance were conducted to test Hypothesis 2; moderation analysis was used to test Hypothesis 3; independent samples t-test was conducted to test Hypothesis 4. RESULTS: None of the hypotheses was supported. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides an important starting point from which to inform further work exploring how question wording can improve self-reported measurement of height and weight. Future research should explore how question preambles may or may not operationalise hypothesised underlying mechanisms, the sensitivity or intrusiveness of height and weight questions, individual beliefs about one’s height and weight, and survey context. BioMed Central 2022-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9487130/ /pubmed/36123633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01690-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Van Dyke, Nina
Drinkwater, Eric J.
Rachele, Jerome N.
Improving the accuracy of self-reported height and weight in surveys: an experimental study
title Improving the accuracy of self-reported height and weight in surveys: an experimental study
title_full Improving the accuracy of self-reported height and weight in surveys: an experimental study
title_fullStr Improving the accuracy of self-reported height and weight in surveys: an experimental study
title_full_unstemmed Improving the accuracy of self-reported height and weight in surveys: an experimental study
title_short Improving the accuracy of self-reported height and weight in surveys: an experimental study
title_sort improving the accuracy of self-reported height and weight in surveys: an experimental study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9487130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36123633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01690-x
work_keys_str_mv AT vandykenina improvingtheaccuracyofselfreportedheightandweightinsurveysanexperimentalstudy
AT drinkwaterericj improvingtheaccuracyofselfreportedheightandweightinsurveysanexperimentalstudy
AT rachelejeromen improvingtheaccuracyofselfreportedheightandweightinsurveysanexperimentalstudy