Cargando…
Recipient Cell Factors Influence Interbacterial Competition Mediated by Two Distinct Burkholderia dolosa Contact-Dependent Growth Inhibition Systems
Contact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) systems mediate interbacterial antagonism between Gram-negative bacteria by delivering the toxic portion of a large surface protein (termed BcpA in Burkholderia species) to the cytoplasm of neighboring bacteria. Translocation of the antibacterial polypeptide...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Microbiology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9487645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36000834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jb.00541-21 |
_version_ | 1784792497027809280 |
---|---|
author | Elery, Zaria K. Oates, A. Elizabeth Myers-Morales, Tanya Garcia, Erin C. |
author_facet | Elery, Zaria K. Oates, A. Elizabeth Myers-Morales, Tanya Garcia, Erin C. |
author_sort | Elery, Zaria K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Contact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) systems mediate interbacterial antagonism between Gram-negative bacteria by delivering the toxic portion of a large surface protein (termed BcpA in Burkholderia species) to the cytoplasm of neighboring bacteria. Translocation of the antibacterial polypeptide into recipient cells requires specific recipient outer and inner membrane proteins, but the identity of these factors outside several model organisms is unknown. To identify genes involved in CDI susceptibility in the Burkholderia cepacia complex member Burkholderia dolosa, a transposon mutagenesis selection approach was used to enrich for mutants resistant to BcpA-1 or BcpA-2. Subsequent analysis showed that candidate regulatory genes contributed modestly to recipient cell susceptibility to B. dolosa CDI. However, most candidate deletion mutants did not show the same phenotypes as the corresponding transposon mutants. Whole-genome resequencing revealed that these transposon mutants also contained unique mutations within a three gene locus (wabO, BDAG_01006, and BDAG_01005) encoding predicted lipopolysaccharide (LPS) biosynthesis enzymes. B. dolosa wabO, BDAG_01006, or BDAG_01005 mutants were resistant to CDI and produced LPS with altered core oligosaccharide and O-antigen. Although BcpA-1 and BcpA-2 are dissimilar and expected to utilize different outer membrane receptors, intoxication by both proteins was similarly impacted by LPS changes. Together, these findings suggest that alterations in cellular regulation may indirectly impact the efficiency of CDI-mediated competition and demonstrate that LPS is required for intoxication by two distinct B. dolosa BcpA proteins. IMPORTANCEContact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) system proteins, produced by many Gram-negative bacteria, are narrow spectrum antimicrobials that inhibit the growth of closely related neighboring bacteria. Here, we use the opportunistic pathogen Burkholderia dolosa to identify genes required for intoxication by two distinct CDI system proteins. Our findings suggest that B. dolosa recipient cells targeted by CDI systems are only intoxicated if they produce full-length lipopolysaccharide. Understanding the mechanisms underlying antagonistic interbacterial interactions may contribute to future therapeutic development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9487645 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Society for Microbiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94876452022-09-21 Recipient Cell Factors Influence Interbacterial Competition Mediated by Two Distinct Burkholderia dolosa Contact-Dependent Growth Inhibition Systems Elery, Zaria K. Oates, A. Elizabeth Myers-Morales, Tanya Garcia, Erin C. J Bacteriol Research Article Contact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) systems mediate interbacterial antagonism between Gram-negative bacteria by delivering the toxic portion of a large surface protein (termed BcpA in Burkholderia species) to the cytoplasm of neighboring bacteria. Translocation of the antibacterial polypeptide into recipient cells requires specific recipient outer and inner membrane proteins, but the identity of these factors outside several model organisms is unknown. To identify genes involved in CDI susceptibility in the Burkholderia cepacia complex member Burkholderia dolosa, a transposon mutagenesis selection approach was used to enrich for mutants resistant to BcpA-1 or BcpA-2. Subsequent analysis showed that candidate regulatory genes contributed modestly to recipient cell susceptibility to B. dolosa CDI. However, most candidate deletion mutants did not show the same phenotypes as the corresponding transposon mutants. Whole-genome resequencing revealed that these transposon mutants also contained unique mutations within a three gene locus (wabO, BDAG_01006, and BDAG_01005) encoding predicted lipopolysaccharide (LPS) biosynthesis enzymes. B. dolosa wabO, BDAG_01006, or BDAG_01005 mutants were resistant to CDI and produced LPS with altered core oligosaccharide and O-antigen. Although BcpA-1 and BcpA-2 are dissimilar and expected to utilize different outer membrane receptors, intoxication by both proteins was similarly impacted by LPS changes. Together, these findings suggest that alterations in cellular regulation may indirectly impact the efficiency of CDI-mediated competition and demonstrate that LPS is required for intoxication by two distinct B. dolosa BcpA proteins. IMPORTANCEContact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) system proteins, produced by many Gram-negative bacteria, are narrow spectrum antimicrobials that inhibit the growth of closely related neighboring bacteria. Here, we use the opportunistic pathogen Burkholderia dolosa to identify genes required for intoxication by two distinct CDI system proteins. Our findings suggest that B. dolosa recipient cells targeted by CDI systems are only intoxicated if they produce full-length lipopolysaccharide. Understanding the mechanisms underlying antagonistic interbacterial interactions may contribute to future therapeutic development. American Society for Microbiology 2022-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9487645/ /pubmed/36000834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jb.00541-21 Text en Copyright © 2022 Elery et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Article Elery, Zaria K. Oates, A. Elizabeth Myers-Morales, Tanya Garcia, Erin C. Recipient Cell Factors Influence Interbacterial Competition Mediated by Two Distinct Burkholderia dolosa Contact-Dependent Growth Inhibition Systems |
title | Recipient Cell Factors Influence Interbacterial Competition Mediated by Two Distinct Burkholderia dolosa Contact-Dependent Growth Inhibition Systems |
title_full | Recipient Cell Factors Influence Interbacterial Competition Mediated by Two Distinct Burkholderia dolosa Contact-Dependent Growth Inhibition Systems |
title_fullStr | Recipient Cell Factors Influence Interbacterial Competition Mediated by Two Distinct Burkholderia dolosa Contact-Dependent Growth Inhibition Systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Recipient Cell Factors Influence Interbacterial Competition Mediated by Two Distinct Burkholderia dolosa Contact-Dependent Growth Inhibition Systems |
title_short | Recipient Cell Factors Influence Interbacterial Competition Mediated by Two Distinct Burkholderia dolosa Contact-Dependent Growth Inhibition Systems |
title_sort | recipient cell factors influence interbacterial competition mediated by two distinct burkholderia dolosa contact-dependent growth inhibition systems |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9487645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36000834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jb.00541-21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eleryzariak recipientcellfactorsinfluenceinterbacterialcompetitionmediatedbytwodistinctburkholderiadolosacontactdependentgrowthinhibitionsystems AT oatesaelizabeth recipientcellfactorsinfluenceinterbacterialcompetitionmediatedbytwodistinctburkholderiadolosacontactdependentgrowthinhibitionsystems AT myersmoralestanya recipientcellfactorsinfluenceinterbacterialcompetitionmediatedbytwodistinctburkholderiadolosacontactdependentgrowthinhibitionsystems AT garciaerinc recipientcellfactorsinfluenceinterbacterialcompetitionmediatedbytwodistinctburkholderiadolosacontactdependentgrowthinhibitionsystems |