Cargando…

Recipient Cell Factors Influence Interbacterial Competition Mediated by Two Distinct Burkholderia dolosa Contact-Dependent Growth Inhibition Systems

Contact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) systems mediate interbacterial antagonism between Gram-negative bacteria by delivering the toxic portion of a large surface protein (termed BcpA in Burkholderia species) to the cytoplasm of neighboring bacteria. Translocation of the antibacterial polypeptide...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elery, Zaria K., Oates, A. Elizabeth, Myers-Morales, Tanya, Garcia, Erin C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9487645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36000834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jb.00541-21
_version_ 1784792497027809280
author Elery, Zaria K.
Oates, A. Elizabeth
Myers-Morales, Tanya
Garcia, Erin C.
author_facet Elery, Zaria K.
Oates, A. Elizabeth
Myers-Morales, Tanya
Garcia, Erin C.
author_sort Elery, Zaria K.
collection PubMed
description Contact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) systems mediate interbacterial antagonism between Gram-negative bacteria by delivering the toxic portion of a large surface protein (termed BcpA in Burkholderia species) to the cytoplasm of neighboring bacteria. Translocation of the antibacterial polypeptide into recipient cells requires specific recipient outer and inner membrane proteins, but the identity of these factors outside several model organisms is unknown. To identify genes involved in CDI susceptibility in the Burkholderia cepacia complex member Burkholderia dolosa, a transposon mutagenesis selection approach was used to enrich for mutants resistant to BcpA-1 or BcpA-2. Subsequent analysis showed that candidate regulatory genes contributed modestly to recipient cell susceptibility to B. dolosa CDI. However, most candidate deletion mutants did not show the same phenotypes as the corresponding transposon mutants. Whole-genome resequencing revealed that these transposon mutants also contained unique mutations within a three gene locus (wabO, BDAG_01006, and BDAG_01005) encoding predicted lipopolysaccharide (LPS) biosynthesis enzymes. B. dolosa wabO, BDAG_01006, or BDAG_01005 mutants were resistant to CDI and produced LPS with altered core oligosaccharide and O-antigen. Although BcpA-1 and BcpA-2 are dissimilar and expected to utilize different outer membrane receptors, intoxication by both proteins was similarly impacted by LPS changes. Together, these findings suggest that alterations in cellular regulation may indirectly impact the efficiency of CDI-mediated competition and demonstrate that LPS is required for intoxication by two distinct B. dolosa BcpA proteins. IMPORTANCEContact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) system proteins, produced by many Gram-negative bacteria, are narrow spectrum antimicrobials that inhibit the growth of closely related neighboring bacteria. Here, we use the opportunistic pathogen Burkholderia dolosa to identify genes required for intoxication by two distinct CDI system proteins. Our findings suggest that B. dolosa recipient cells targeted by CDI systems are only intoxicated if they produce full-length lipopolysaccharide. Understanding the mechanisms underlying antagonistic interbacterial interactions may contribute to future therapeutic development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9487645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94876452022-09-21 Recipient Cell Factors Influence Interbacterial Competition Mediated by Two Distinct Burkholderia dolosa Contact-Dependent Growth Inhibition Systems Elery, Zaria K. Oates, A. Elizabeth Myers-Morales, Tanya Garcia, Erin C. J Bacteriol Research Article Contact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) systems mediate interbacterial antagonism between Gram-negative bacteria by delivering the toxic portion of a large surface protein (termed BcpA in Burkholderia species) to the cytoplasm of neighboring bacteria. Translocation of the antibacterial polypeptide into recipient cells requires specific recipient outer and inner membrane proteins, but the identity of these factors outside several model organisms is unknown. To identify genes involved in CDI susceptibility in the Burkholderia cepacia complex member Burkholderia dolosa, a transposon mutagenesis selection approach was used to enrich for mutants resistant to BcpA-1 or BcpA-2. Subsequent analysis showed that candidate regulatory genes contributed modestly to recipient cell susceptibility to B. dolosa CDI. However, most candidate deletion mutants did not show the same phenotypes as the corresponding transposon mutants. Whole-genome resequencing revealed that these transposon mutants also contained unique mutations within a three gene locus (wabO, BDAG_01006, and BDAG_01005) encoding predicted lipopolysaccharide (LPS) biosynthesis enzymes. B. dolosa wabO, BDAG_01006, or BDAG_01005 mutants were resistant to CDI and produced LPS with altered core oligosaccharide and O-antigen. Although BcpA-1 and BcpA-2 are dissimilar and expected to utilize different outer membrane receptors, intoxication by both proteins was similarly impacted by LPS changes. Together, these findings suggest that alterations in cellular regulation may indirectly impact the efficiency of CDI-mediated competition and demonstrate that LPS is required for intoxication by two distinct B. dolosa BcpA proteins. IMPORTANCEContact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) system proteins, produced by many Gram-negative bacteria, are narrow spectrum antimicrobials that inhibit the growth of closely related neighboring bacteria. Here, we use the opportunistic pathogen Burkholderia dolosa to identify genes required for intoxication by two distinct CDI system proteins. Our findings suggest that B. dolosa recipient cells targeted by CDI systems are only intoxicated if they produce full-length lipopolysaccharide. Understanding the mechanisms underlying antagonistic interbacterial interactions may contribute to future therapeutic development. American Society for Microbiology 2022-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9487645/ /pubmed/36000834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jb.00541-21 Text en Copyright © 2022 Elery et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Elery, Zaria K.
Oates, A. Elizabeth
Myers-Morales, Tanya
Garcia, Erin C.
Recipient Cell Factors Influence Interbacterial Competition Mediated by Two Distinct Burkholderia dolosa Contact-Dependent Growth Inhibition Systems
title Recipient Cell Factors Influence Interbacterial Competition Mediated by Two Distinct Burkholderia dolosa Contact-Dependent Growth Inhibition Systems
title_full Recipient Cell Factors Influence Interbacterial Competition Mediated by Two Distinct Burkholderia dolosa Contact-Dependent Growth Inhibition Systems
title_fullStr Recipient Cell Factors Influence Interbacterial Competition Mediated by Two Distinct Burkholderia dolosa Contact-Dependent Growth Inhibition Systems
title_full_unstemmed Recipient Cell Factors Influence Interbacterial Competition Mediated by Two Distinct Burkholderia dolosa Contact-Dependent Growth Inhibition Systems
title_short Recipient Cell Factors Influence Interbacterial Competition Mediated by Two Distinct Burkholderia dolosa Contact-Dependent Growth Inhibition Systems
title_sort recipient cell factors influence interbacterial competition mediated by two distinct burkholderia dolosa contact-dependent growth inhibition systems
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9487645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36000834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jb.00541-21
work_keys_str_mv AT eleryzariak recipientcellfactorsinfluenceinterbacterialcompetitionmediatedbytwodistinctburkholderiadolosacontactdependentgrowthinhibitionsystems
AT oatesaelizabeth recipientcellfactorsinfluenceinterbacterialcompetitionmediatedbytwodistinctburkholderiadolosacontactdependentgrowthinhibitionsystems
AT myersmoralestanya recipientcellfactorsinfluenceinterbacterialcompetitionmediatedbytwodistinctburkholderiadolosacontactdependentgrowthinhibitionsystems
AT garciaerinc recipientcellfactorsinfluenceinterbacterialcompetitionmediatedbytwodistinctburkholderiadolosacontactdependentgrowthinhibitionsystems