Cargando…
A Cross-Sectional Study to Ascertain the Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Regional Anaesthesia Practices Amongst Anaesthesiologists of India
Background and aims Regional anaesthesia has been advocated as a preferred modality during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‑19) pandemic, but pursuing regional anaesthesia during COVID-19 is challenging. Our cross-sectional survey aimed to analyze the challenges in conducting regional anaesthesia...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9487841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36158351 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.28228 |
_version_ | 1784792529793712128 |
---|---|
author | Gupta, Anju Krishna, Bhavya Narayanan, Vishnu Kumar, Shailendra Gupta, Nishkarsh Malviya, Amit K Malhotra, Rajeev Kumar Kashyap, Lokesh |
author_facet | Gupta, Anju Krishna, Bhavya Narayanan, Vishnu Kumar, Shailendra Gupta, Nishkarsh Malviya, Amit K Malhotra, Rajeev Kumar Kashyap, Lokesh |
author_sort | Gupta, Anju |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and aims Regional anaesthesia has been advocated as a preferred modality during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‑19) pandemic, but pursuing regional anaesthesia during COVID-19 is challenging. Our cross-sectional survey aimed to analyze the challenges in conducting regional anaesthesia and the alterations in practices imposed by the COVID‑19 pandemic across the nation. Material and methods The questionnaire was validated by seven experts. Following ethical approval and trial registration, this Google Forms-based survey was circulated to anaesthesiologists across the country via emails over 3 months (April 2021 to June 2021). Weekly reminders were sent to the non-responders till the desired sample size was attained, after which the survey was closed and responses were analyzed. Results Five hundred and thirty-two of 1100 anaesthesiologists completed the survey (48.3% response rate). Among the 532 respondents, 65.8% reported an increase in the use of regional anaesthesia due to the pandemic, with 77.4% reporting a change in practice. Almost 90% of the respondents used a dedicated operation theatre for all infected patients. Most respondents (75%) used disposable plastic drapes (75%) and full personal protective equipment (PPE) for COVID-19-positive patients during the procedure. However, using PPE resulted in poor vision due to fogging and multiple attempts and increased performance duration. Most respondents (74.4%) used gloves to maintain ultrasound probe sterility, while many other respondents (65.7%) used a sterile camera cover for the same. Many respondents ordered inflammatory markers during preoperative evaluation. Conclusion The present survey revealed that there was increased utilization of regional anaesthesia with increased utilization of PPE, sterility routines, and ordering of investigations. The use of PPE led to many challenges while performing regional anaesthesia. However, many deviations were identified from the accepted recommendations, and one needs to be aware of proper practices to achieve optimal patient outcomes and provider safety. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9487841 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94878412022-09-23 A Cross-Sectional Study to Ascertain the Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Regional Anaesthesia Practices Amongst Anaesthesiologists of India Gupta, Anju Krishna, Bhavya Narayanan, Vishnu Kumar, Shailendra Gupta, Nishkarsh Malviya, Amit K Malhotra, Rajeev Kumar Kashyap, Lokesh Cureus Anesthesiology Background and aims Regional anaesthesia has been advocated as a preferred modality during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‑19) pandemic, but pursuing regional anaesthesia during COVID-19 is challenging. Our cross-sectional survey aimed to analyze the challenges in conducting regional anaesthesia and the alterations in practices imposed by the COVID‑19 pandemic across the nation. Material and methods The questionnaire was validated by seven experts. Following ethical approval and trial registration, this Google Forms-based survey was circulated to anaesthesiologists across the country via emails over 3 months (April 2021 to June 2021). Weekly reminders were sent to the non-responders till the desired sample size was attained, after which the survey was closed and responses were analyzed. Results Five hundred and thirty-two of 1100 anaesthesiologists completed the survey (48.3% response rate). Among the 532 respondents, 65.8% reported an increase in the use of regional anaesthesia due to the pandemic, with 77.4% reporting a change in practice. Almost 90% of the respondents used a dedicated operation theatre for all infected patients. Most respondents (75%) used disposable plastic drapes (75%) and full personal protective equipment (PPE) for COVID-19-positive patients during the procedure. However, using PPE resulted in poor vision due to fogging and multiple attempts and increased performance duration. Most respondents (74.4%) used gloves to maintain ultrasound probe sterility, while many other respondents (65.7%) used a sterile camera cover for the same. Many respondents ordered inflammatory markers during preoperative evaluation. Conclusion The present survey revealed that there was increased utilization of regional anaesthesia with increased utilization of PPE, sterility routines, and ordering of investigations. The use of PPE led to many challenges while performing regional anaesthesia. However, many deviations were identified from the accepted recommendations, and one needs to be aware of proper practices to achieve optimal patient outcomes and provider safety. Cureus 2022-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9487841/ /pubmed/36158351 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.28228 Text en Copyright © 2022, Gupta et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Anesthesiology Gupta, Anju Krishna, Bhavya Narayanan, Vishnu Kumar, Shailendra Gupta, Nishkarsh Malviya, Amit K Malhotra, Rajeev Kumar Kashyap, Lokesh A Cross-Sectional Study to Ascertain the Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Regional Anaesthesia Practices Amongst Anaesthesiologists of India |
title | A Cross-Sectional Study to Ascertain the Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Regional Anaesthesia Practices Amongst Anaesthesiologists of India |
title_full | A Cross-Sectional Study to Ascertain the Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Regional Anaesthesia Practices Amongst Anaesthesiologists of India |
title_fullStr | A Cross-Sectional Study to Ascertain the Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Regional Anaesthesia Practices Amongst Anaesthesiologists of India |
title_full_unstemmed | A Cross-Sectional Study to Ascertain the Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Regional Anaesthesia Practices Amongst Anaesthesiologists of India |
title_short | A Cross-Sectional Study to Ascertain the Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Regional Anaesthesia Practices Amongst Anaesthesiologists of India |
title_sort | cross-sectional study to ascertain the effect of covid-19 pandemic on regional anaesthesia practices amongst anaesthesiologists of india |
topic | Anesthesiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9487841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36158351 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.28228 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guptaanju acrosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia AT krishnabhavya acrosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia AT narayananvishnu acrosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia AT kumarshailendra acrosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia AT guptanishkarsh acrosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia AT malviyaamitk acrosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia AT malhotrarajeevkumar acrosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia AT kashyaplokesh acrosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia AT guptaanju crosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia AT krishnabhavya crosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia AT narayananvishnu crosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia AT kumarshailendra crosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia AT guptanishkarsh crosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia AT malviyaamitk crosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia AT malhotrarajeevkumar crosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia AT kashyaplokesh crosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia |