Cargando…

A Cross-Sectional Study to Ascertain the Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Regional Anaesthesia Practices Amongst Anaesthesiologists of India

Background and aims Regional anaesthesia has been advocated as a preferred modality during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‑19) pandemic, but pursuing regional anaesthesia during COVID-19 is challenging. Our cross-sectional survey aimed to analyze the challenges in conducting regional anaesthesia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Anju, Krishna, Bhavya, Narayanan, Vishnu, Kumar, Shailendra, Gupta, Nishkarsh, Malviya, Amit K, Malhotra, Rajeev Kumar, Kashyap, Lokesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9487841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36158351
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.28228
_version_ 1784792529793712128
author Gupta, Anju
Krishna, Bhavya
Narayanan, Vishnu
Kumar, Shailendra
Gupta, Nishkarsh
Malviya, Amit K
Malhotra, Rajeev Kumar
Kashyap, Lokesh
author_facet Gupta, Anju
Krishna, Bhavya
Narayanan, Vishnu
Kumar, Shailendra
Gupta, Nishkarsh
Malviya, Amit K
Malhotra, Rajeev Kumar
Kashyap, Lokesh
author_sort Gupta, Anju
collection PubMed
description Background and aims Regional anaesthesia has been advocated as a preferred modality during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‑19) pandemic, but pursuing regional anaesthesia during COVID-19 is challenging. Our cross-sectional survey aimed to analyze the challenges in conducting regional anaesthesia and the alterations in practices imposed by the COVID‑19 pandemic across the nation. Material and methods The questionnaire was validated by seven experts. Following ethical approval and trial registration, this Google Forms-based survey was circulated to anaesthesiologists across the country via emails over 3 months (April 2021 to June 2021). Weekly reminders were sent to the non-responders till the desired sample size was attained, after which the survey was closed and responses were analyzed. Results Five hundred and thirty-two of 1100 anaesthesiologists completed the survey (48.3% response rate). Among the 532 respondents, 65.8% reported an increase in the use of regional anaesthesia due to the pandemic, with 77.4% reporting a change in practice. Almost 90% of the respondents used a dedicated operation theatre for all infected patients. Most respondents (75%) used disposable plastic drapes (75%) and full personal protective equipment (PPE) for COVID-19-positive patients during the procedure. However, using PPE resulted in poor vision due to fogging and multiple attempts and increased performance duration. Most respondents (74.4%) used gloves to maintain ultrasound probe sterility, while many other respondents (65.7%) used a sterile camera cover for the same. Many respondents ordered inflammatory markers during preoperative evaluation. Conclusion The present survey revealed that there was increased utilization of regional anaesthesia with increased utilization of PPE, sterility routines, and ordering of investigations. The use of PPE led to many challenges while performing regional anaesthesia. However, many deviations were identified from the accepted recommendations, and one needs to be aware of proper practices to achieve optimal patient outcomes and provider safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9487841
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94878412022-09-23 A Cross-Sectional Study to Ascertain the Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Regional Anaesthesia Practices Amongst Anaesthesiologists of India Gupta, Anju Krishna, Bhavya Narayanan, Vishnu Kumar, Shailendra Gupta, Nishkarsh Malviya, Amit K Malhotra, Rajeev Kumar Kashyap, Lokesh Cureus Anesthesiology Background and aims Regional anaesthesia has been advocated as a preferred modality during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‑19) pandemic, but pursuing regional anaesthesia during COVID-19 is challenging. Our cross-sectional survey aimed to analyze the challenges in conducting regional anaesthesia and the alterations in practices imposed by the COVID‑19 pandemic across the nation. Material and methods The questionnaire was validated by seven experts. Following ethical approval and trial registration, this Google Forms-based survey was circulated to anaesthesiologists across the country via emails over 3 months (April 2021 to June 2021). Weekly reminders were sent to the non-responders till the desired sample size was attained, after which the survey was closed and responses were analyzed. Results Five hundred and thirty-two of 1100 anaesthesiologists completed the survey (48.3% response rate). Among the 532 respondents, 65.8% reported an increase in the use of regional anaesthesia due to the pandemic, with 77.4% reporting a change in practice. Almost 90% of the respondents used a dedicated operation theatre for all infected patients. Most respondents (75%) used disposable plastic drapes (75%) and full personal protective equipment (PPE) for COVID-19-positive patients during the procedure. However, using PPE resulted in poor vision due to fogging and multiple attempts and increased performance duration. Most respondents (74.4%) used gloves to maintain ultrasound probe sterility, while many other respondents (65.7%) used a sterile camera cover for the same. Many respondents ordered inflammatory markers during preoperative evaluation. Conclusion The present survey revealed that there was increased utilization of regional anaesthesia with increased utilization of PPE, sterility routines, and ordering of investigations. The use of PPE led to many challenges while performing regional anaesthesia. However, many deviations were identified from the accepted recommendations, and one needs to be aware of proper practices to achieve optimal patient outcomes and provider safety. Cureus 2022-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9487841/ /pubmed/36158351 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.28228 Text en Copyright © 2022, Gupta et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Anesthesiology
Gupta, Anju
Krishna, Bhavya
Narayanan, Vishnu
Kumar, Shailendra
Gupta, Nishkarsh
Malviya, Amit K
Malhotra, Rajeev Kumar
Kashyap, Lokesh
A Cross-Sectional Study to Ascertain the Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Regional Anaesthesia Practices Amongst Anaesthesiologists of India
title A Cross-Sectional Study to Ascertain the Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Regional Anaesthesia Practices Amongst Anaesthesiologists of India
title_full A Cross-Sectional Study to Ascertain the Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Regional Anaesthesia Practices Amongst Anaesthesiologists of India
title_fullStr A Cross-Sectional Study to Ascertain the Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Regional Anaesthesia Practices Amongst Anaesthesiologists of India
title_full_unstemmed A Cross-Sectional Study to Ascertain the Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Regional Anaesthesia Practices Amongst Anaesthesiologists of India
title_short A Cross-Sectional Study to Ascertain the Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Regional Anaesthesia Practices Amongst Anaesthesiologists of India
title_sort cross-sectional study to ascertain the effect of covid-19 pandemic on regional anaesthesia practices amongst anaesthesiologists of india
topic Anesthesiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9487841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36158351
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.28228
work_keys_str_mv AT guptaanju acrosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia
AT krishnabhavya acrosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia
AT narayananvishnu acrosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia
AT kumarshailendra acrosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia
AT guptanishkarsh acrosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia
AT malviyaamitk acrosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia
AT malhotrarajeevkumar acrosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia
AT kashyaplokesh acrosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia
AT guptaanju crosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia
AT krishnabhavya crosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia
AT narayananvishnu crosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia
AT kumarshailendra crosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia
AT guptanishkarsh crosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia
AT malviyaamitk crosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia
AT malhotrarajeevkumar crosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia
AT kashyaplokesh crosssectionalstudytoascertaintheeffectofcovid19pandemiconregionalanaesthesiapracticesamongstanaesthesiologistsofindia