Cargando…
Promoting trust in research and researchers: How open science and research integrity are intertwined
Proponents of open science often refer to issues pertaining to research integrity and vice versa. In this commentary, we argue that concepts such as responsible research practices, transparency, and open science are connected to one another, but that they each have a different focus. We argue that r...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9487848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36127719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06169-y |
_version_ | 1784792531539591168 |
---|---|
author | Haven, Tamarinde Gopalakrishna, Gowri Tijdink, Joeri van der Schot, Dorien Bouter, Lex |
author_facet | Haven, Tamarinde Gopalakrishna, Gowri Tijdink, Joeri van der Schot, Dorien Bouter, Lex |
author_sort | Haven, Tamarinde |
collection | PubMed |
description | Proponents of open science often refer to issues pertaining to research integrity and vice versa. In this commentary, we argue that concepts such as responsible research practices, transparency, and open science are connected to one another, but that they each have a different focus. We argue that responsible research practices focus more on the rigorous conduct of research, transparency focuses predominantly on the complete reporting of research, and open science’s core focus is mostly about dissemination of research. Doing justice to these concepts requires action from researchers and research institutions to make research with integrity possible, easy, normative, and rewarding. For each of these levels from the Center for Open Science pyramid of behaviour change, we provide suggestions on what researchers and research institutions can do to promote a culture of research integrity. We close with a brief reflection on initiatives by other research communities and stakeholders and make a call to those working in the fields of research integrity and open science to pay closer attention to one other’s work. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9487848 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94878482022-09-21 Promoting trust in research and researchers: How open science and research integrity are intertwined Haven, Tamarinde Gopalakrishna, Gowri Tijdink, Joeri van der Schot, Dorien Bouter, Lex BMC Res Notes Commentary Proponents of open science often refer to issues pertaining to research integrity and vice versa. In this commentary, we argue that concepts such as responsible research practices, transparency, and open science are connected to one another, but that they each have a different focus. We argue that responsible research practices focus more on the rigorous conduct of research, transparency focuses predominantly on the complete reporting of research, and open science’s core focus is mostly about dissemination of research. Doing justice to these concepts requires action from researchers and research institutions to make research with integrity possible, easy, normative, and rewarding. For each of these levels from the Center for Open Science pyramid of behaviour change, we provide suggestions on what researchers and research institutions can do to promote a culture of research integrity. We close with a brief reflection on initiatives by other research communities and stakeholders and make a call to those working in the fields of research integrity and open science to pay closer attention to one other’s work. BioMed Central 2022-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9487848/ /pubmed/36127719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06169-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Haven, Tamarinde Gopalakrishna, Gowri Tijdink, Joeri van der Schot, Dorien Bouter, Lex Promoting trust in research and researchers: How open science and research integrity are intertwined |
title | Promoting trust in research and researchers: How open science and research integrity are intertwined |
title_full | Promoting trust in research and researchers: How open science and research integrity are intertwined |
title_fullStr | Promoting trust in research and researchers: How open science and research integrity are intertwined |
title_full_unstemmed | Promoting trust in research and researchers: How open science and research integrity are intertwined |
title_short | Promoting trust in research and researchers: How open science and research integrity are intertwined |
title_sort | promoting trust in research and researchers: how open science and research integrity are intertwined |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9487848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36127719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06169-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haventamarinde promotingtrustinresearchandresearchershowopenscienceandresearchintegrityareintertwined AT gopalakrishnagowri promotingtrustinresearchandresearchershowopenscienceandresearchintegrityareintertwined AT tijdinkjoeri promotingtrustinresearchandresearchershowopenscienceandresearchintegrityareintertwined AT vanderschotdorien promotingtrustinresearchandresearchershowopenscienceandresearchintegrityareintertwined AT bouterlex promotingtrustinresearchandresearchershowopenscienceandresearchintegrityareintertwined |