Cargando…
Does explaining the origins of misinformation improve the effectiveness of a given correction?
Misinformation often has a continuing influence on event-related reasoning even when it is clearly and credibly corrected; this is referred to as the continued influence effect. The present work investigated whether a correction’s effectiveness can be improved by explaining the origins of the misinf...
Autores principales: | Connor Desai, Saoirse, Reimers, Stian |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9487849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36125658 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01354-7 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparing the use of open and closed questions for Web-based measures of the continued-influence effect
por: Connor Desai, Saoirse, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Does truth matter to voters? The effects of correcting political misinformation in an Australian sample
por: Aird, Michael J., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Impact of correcting misinformation on social disruption
por: Iizuka, Ryusuke, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Bypassing misinformation without confrontation improves policy support as much as correcting it
por: Calabrese, Christopher, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Multiple-choice quizzes improve memory for misinformation debunks, but do not reduce belief in misinformation
por: Collier, Jessica R., et al.
Publicado: (2023)