Cargando…

The valuation of China’s environmental degradation from 2004 to 2017

This paper aims to evaluate the cost of environmental degradation by adopting the conventional environmental economic methodology in China from 2004 to 2017 and summarize the change in both the causes and costs of China’s environmental degradation. Results from this study revealed the following: i....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Guoxia, Peng, Fei, Yang, Weishan, Yan, Gang, Gao, Shuting, Zhou, Xiafei, Qi, Ji, Cao, Dong, Zhao, Yue, Pan, Wen, Jiang, Hongqiang, Jing, Hong, Dong, Guangxia, Gao, Minxue, Zhou, Jingbo, Yu, Fang, Wang, Jinnan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9488014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36160375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2020.100016
_version_ 1784792566528475136
author Ma, Guoxia
Peng, Fei
Yang, Weishan
Yan, Gang
Gao, Shuting
Zhou, Xiafei
Qi, Ji
Cao, Dong
Zhao, Yue
Pan, Wen
Jiang, Hongqiang
Jing, Hong
Dong, Guangxia
Gao, Minxue
Zhou, Jingbo
Yu, Fang
Wang, Jinnan
author_facet Ma, Guoxia
Peng, Fei
Yang, Weishan
Yan, Gang
Gao, Shuting
Zhou, Xiafei
Qi, Ji
Cao, Dong
Zhao, Yue
Pan, Wen
Jiang, Hongqiang
Jing, Hong
Dong, Guangxia
Gao, Minxue
Zhou, Jingbo
Yu, Fang
Wang, Jinnan
author_sort Ma, Guoxia
collection PubMed
description This paper aims to evaluate the cost of environmental degradation by adopting the conventional environmental economic methodology in China from 2004 to 2017 and summarize the change in both the causes and costs of China’s environmental degradation. Results from this study revealed the following: i. The environmental degradation cost in China increased from 511 billion yuan to 1,892 billion yuan from 2004 to 2017, and its share in the GDP decreased from 3.05% to 2.23%; ii. The environmental degradation cost growth rate was lower than the GDP growth rate. The environmental degradation cost growth rate decreased sharply, by dropping from 10% in 2014 to 2% in 2017. The environmental benefits of industrial transformation have emerged; iii. The provinces of Shandong, Hebei, Jiangsu, Henan, and Guangdong had the highest environmental degradation costs. The annual average growth rate of the environmental degradation costs in Jiangsu, Guangdong, and Zhejiang were lower than their growth rate of the GDP respectively; iv. Consideration of environmental degradation cost in decision-making could contribute to the high-quality development of China.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9488014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94880142022-09-23 The valuation of China’s environmental degradation from 2004 to 2017 Ma, Guoxia Peng, Fei Yang, Weishan Yan, Gang Gao, Shuting Zhou, Xiafei Qi, Ji Cao, Dong Zhao, Yue Pan, Wen Jiang, Hongqiang Jing, Hong Dong, Guangxia Gao, Minxue Zhou, Jingbo Yu, Fang Wang, Jinnan Environ Sci Ecotechnol Original Research This paper aims to evaluate the cost of environmental degradation by adopting the conventional environmental economic methodology in China from 2004 to 2017 and summarize the change in both the causes and costs of China’s environmental degradation. Results from this study revealed the following: i. The environmental degradation cost in China increased from 511 billion yuan to 1,892 billion yuan from 2004 to 2017, and its share in the GDP decreased from 3.05% to 2.23%; ii. The environmental degradation cost growth rate was lower than the GDP growth rate. The environmental degradation cost growth rate decreased sharply, by dropping from 10% in 2014 to 2% in 2017. The environmental benefits of industrial transformation have emerged; iii. The provinces of Shandong, Hebei, Jiangsu, Henan, and Guangdong had the highest environmental degradation costs. The annual average growth rate of the environmental degradation costs in Jiangsu, Guangdong, and Zhejiang were lower than their growth rate of the GDP respectively; iv. Consideration of environmental degradation cost in decision-making could contribute to the high-quality development of China. Elsevier 2020-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9488014/ /pubmed/36160375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2020.100016 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Ma, Guoxia
Peng, Fei
Yang, Weishan
Yan, Gang
Gao, Shuting
Zhou, Xiafei
Qi, Ji
Cao, Dong
Zhao, Yue
Pan, Wen
Jiang, Hongqiang
Jing, Hong
Dong, Guangxia
Gao, Minxue
Zhou, Jingbo
Yu, Fang
Wang, Jinnan
The valuation of China’s environmental degradation from 2004 to 2017
title The valuation of China’s environmental degradation from 2004 to 2017
title_full The valuation of China’s environmental degradation from 2004 to 2017
title_fullStr The valuation of China’s environmental degradation from 2004 to 2017
title_full_unstemmed The valuation of China’s environmental degradation from 2004 to 2017
title_short The valuation of China’s environmental degradation from 2004 to 2017
title_sort valuation of china’s environmental degradation from 2004 to 2017
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9488014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36160375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2020.100016
work_keys_str_mv AT maguoxia thevaluationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT pengfei thevaluationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT yangweishan thevaluationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT yangang thevaluationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT gaoshuting thevaluationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT zhouxiafei thevaluationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT qiji thevaluationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT caodong thevaluationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT zhaoyue thevaluationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT panwen thevaluationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT jianghongqiang thevaluationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT jinghong thevaluationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT dongguangxia thevaluationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT gaominxue thevaluationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT zhoujingbo thevaluationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT yufang thevaluationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT wangjinnan thevaluationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT maguoxia valuationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT pengfei valuationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT yangweishan valuationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT yangang valuationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT gaoshuting valuationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT zhouxiafei valuationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT qiji valuationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT caodong valuationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT zhaoyue valuationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT panwen valuationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT jianghongqiang valuationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT jinghong valuationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT dongguangxia valuationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT gaominxue valuationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT zhoujingbo valuationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT yufang valuationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017
AT wangjinnan valuationofchinasenvironmentaldegradationfrom2004to2017