Cargando…

Alternative use of endocavitary probe to guide minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: is it reasonable?

PURPOSE: To describe the use of endocavitary ultrasound probe as an auxiliary tool when performing partial nephrectomy in cases of endophytic renal tumors, to standardize the method, and to report the preliminary results achieved with this technique. METHODS: Fifteen patients diagnosed with complete...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Batista, Lucas Teixeira, de Oliveira, José Guilherme Reis, Gouvea, Vitor Parente, de Souza, Leonardo Azevedo, Tourinho-Barbosa, Rafael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9488510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36134853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/acb370607
_version_ 1784792674501394432
author Batista, Lucas Teixeira
de Oliveira, José Guilherme Reis
Gouvea, Vitor Parente
de Souza, Leonardo Azevedo
Tourinho-Barbosa, Rafael
author_facet Batista, Lucas Teixeira
de Oliveira, José Guilherme Reis
Gouvea, Vitor Parente
de Souza, Leonardo Azevedo
Tourinho-Barbosa, Rafael
author_sort Batista, Lucas Teixeira
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To describe the use of endocavitary ultrasound probe as an auxiliary tool when performing partial nephrectomy in cases of endophytic renal tumors, to standardize the method, and to report the preliminary results achieved with this technique. METHODS: Fifteen patients diagnosed with completely endophytic underwent partial nephrectomy with the use of an endocavitary ultrasound probe. This article describes the technique involved in partial nephrectomy and details the preparation of the endocavitary ultrasound probe to ensure its safe use. RESULTS: All the patients had a RENAL score between 8 and 11. The median time of warm ischemia was 26 and 18 minutes for laparoscopic or robot-assisted surgery, respectively. The median duration of surgery was 150 minutes, and the median console time was 145 minutes for the laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgery groups, respectively. The median estimate of blood loss was 200 mL. Only three patients in the laparoscopic group had focal positive surgical margins. There were no cases of infection at the site of probe entry. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative use of an endocavitary ultrasound probe for partial nephrectomy is possible and a safe alternative to the excision of endophytic tumors when neither robotic probes nor laparoscopic probes are available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9488510
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94885102022-09-29 Alternative use of endocavitary probe to guide minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: is it reasonable? Batista, Lucas Teixeira de Oliveira, José Guilherme Reis Gouvea, Vitor Parente de Souza, Leonardo Azevedo Tourinho-Barbosa, Rafael Acta Cir Bras Clinical Investigation PURPOSE: To describe the use of endocavitary ultrasound probe as an auxiliary tool when performing partial nephrectomy in cases of endophytic renal tumors, to standardize the method, and to report the preliminary results achieved with this technique. METHODS: Fifteen patients diagnosed with completely endophytic underwent partial nephrectomy with the use of an endocavitary ultrasound probe. This article describes the technique involved in partial nephrectomy and details the preparation of the endocavitary ultrasound probe to ensure its safe use. RESULTS: All the patients had a RENAL score between 8 and 11. The median time of warm ischemia was 26 and 18 minutes for laparoscopic or robot-assisted surgery, respectively. The median duration of surgery was 150 minutes, and the median console time was 145 minutes for the laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgery groups, respectively. The median estimate of blood loss was 200 mL. Only three patients in the laparoscopic group had focal positive surgical margins. There were no cases of infection at the site of probe entry. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative use of an endocavitary ultrasound probe for partial nephrectomy is possible and a safe alternative to the excision of endophytic tumors when neither robotic probes nor laparoscopic probes are available. Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia 2022-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9488510/ /pubmed/36134853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/acb370607 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Batista, Lucas Teixeira
de Oliveira, José Guilherme Reis
Gouvea, Vitor Parente
de Souza, Leonardo Azevedo
Tourinho-Barbosa, Rafael
Alternative use of endocavitary probe to guide minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: is it reasonable?
title Alternative use of endocavitary probe to guide minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: is it reasonable?
title_full Alternative use of endocavitary probe to guide minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: is it reasonable?
title_fullStr Alternative use of endocavitary probe to guide minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: is it reasonable?
title_full_unstemmed Alternative use of endocavitary probe to guide minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: is it reasonable?
title_short Alternative use of endocavitary probe to guide minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: is it reasonable?
title_sort alternative use of endocavitary probe to guide minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: is it reasonable?
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9488510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36134853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/acb370607
work_keys_str_mv AT batistalucasteixeira alternativeuseofendocavitaryprobetoguideminimallyinvasivepartialnephrectomyisitreasonable
AT deoliveirajoseguilhermereis alternativeuseofendocavitaryprobetoguideminimallyinvasivepartialnephrectomyisitreasonable
AT gouveavitorparente alternativeuseofendocavitaryprobetoguideminimallyinvasivepartialnephrectomyisitreasonable
AT desouzaleonardoazevedo alternativeuseofendocavitaryprobetoguideminimallyinvasivepartialnephrectomyisitreasonable
AT tourinhobarbosarafael alternativeuseofendocavitaryprobetoguideminimallyinvasivepartialnephrectomyisitreasonable