Cargando…

Desquamative interstitial pneumonia: a systematic review of its features and outcomes

BACKGROUND: Desquamative Interstitial Pneumonia (DIP) is a rare form of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP). Data on clinical features, aetiology, prognosis and effect of treatment strategies are limited. We aimed to collect all published cases to better characterise DIP. METHODS: A systematic l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hellemons, Merel E., Moor, Catharina C., von der Thüsen, Jan, Rossius, Mariska, Odink, Arlette, Thorgersen, Laila Haugen, Verschakelen, Johny, Wuyts, Wim, Wijsenbeek, Marlies S., Bendstrup, Elisabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Respiratory Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9488565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32581140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0181-2019
_version_ 1784792686501298176
author Hellemons, Merel E.
Moor, Catharina C.
von der Thüsen, Jan
Rossius, Mariska
Odink, Arlette
Thorgersen, Laila Haugen
Verschakelen, Johny
Wuyts, Wim
Wijsenbeek, Marlies S.
Bendstrup, Elisabeth
author_facet Hellemons, Merel E.
Moor, Catharina C.
von der Thüsen, Jan
Rossius, Mariska
Odink, Arlette
Thorgersen, Laila Haugen
Verschakelen, Johny
Wuyts, Wim
Wijsenbeek, Marlies S.
Bendstrup, Elisabeth
author_sort Hellemons, Merel E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Desquamative Interstitial Pneumonia (DIP) is a rare form of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP). Data on clinical features, aetiology, prognosis and effect of treatment strategies are limited. We aimed to collect all published cases to better characterise DIP. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed for all original cases of adult patients with histopathologically-confirmed DIP. Individual patient data were extracted and summarised. RESULTS: We included 68 individual cases and 13 case series reporting on 294 cases. Most common presenting symptoms were dyspnoea and cough. Pulmonary function showed a restrictive pattern (71%) with decreased diffusion capacity. We found a high incidence (81%) of ever smoking in patients with DIP and 22% of patients had other (occupational) exposures. Characteristic features on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan were bilateral ground-glass opacities with lower lobe predominance (92%). Treatment and duration of treatment widely varied. Initial response to treatment was generally good, but definitely not uniformly so. A significant proportion of patients died (25% of individual cases) or experienced a relapse (18% of individual cases). CONCLUSION: DIP remains an uncommon disease, frequently but not always related to smoking or other exposures. Furthermore, DIP behaves as a progressive disease more often than generally thought, possibly associated with different underlying aetiology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9488565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher European Respiratory Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94885652022-11-14 Desquamative interstitial pneumonia: a systematic review of its features and outcomes Hellemons, Merel E. Moor, Catharina C. von der Thüsen, Jan Rossius, Mariska Odink, Arlette Thorgersen, Laila Haugen Verschakelen, Johny Wuyts, Wim Wijsenbeek, Marlies S. Bendstrup, Elisabeth Eur Respir Rev Reviews BACKGROUND: Desquamative Interstitial Pneumonia (DIP) is a rare form of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP). Data on clinical features, aetiology, prognosis and effect of treatment strategies are limited. We aimed to collect all published cases to better characterise DIP. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed for all original cases of adult patients with histopathologically-confirmed DIP. Individual patient data were extracted and summarised. RESULTS: We included 68 individual cases and 13 case series reporting on 294 cases. Most common presenting symptoms were dyspnoea and cough. Pulmonary function showed a restrictive pattern (71%) with decreased diffusion capacity. We found a high incidence (81%) of ever smoking in patients with DIP and 22% of patients had other (occupational) exposures. Characteristic features on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan were bilateral ground-glass opacities with lower lobe predominance (92%). Treatment and duration of treatment widely varied. Initial response to treatment was generally good, but definitely not uniformly so. A significant proportion of patients died (25% of individual cases) or experienced a relapse (18% of individual cases). CONCLUSION: DIP remains an uncommon disease, frequently but not always related to smoking or other exposures. Furthermore, DIP behaves as a progressive disease more often than generally thought, possibly associated with different underlying aetiology. European Respiratory Society 2020-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9488565/ /pubmed/32581140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0181-2019 Text en Copyright ©ERS 2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.
spellingShingle Reviews
Hellemons, Merel E.
Moor, Catharina C.
von der Thüsen, Jan
Rossius, Mariska
Odink, Arlette
Thorgersen, Laila Haugen
Verschakelen, Johny
Wuyts, Wim
Wijsenbeek, Marlies S.
Bendstrup, Elisabeth
Desquamative interstitial pneumonia: a systematic review of its features and outcomes
title Desquamative interstitial pneumonia: a systematic review of its features and outcomes
title_full Desquamative interstitial pneumonia: a systematic review of its features and outcomes
title_fullStr Desquamative interstitial pneumonia: a systematic review of its features and outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Desquamative interstitial pneumonia: a systematic review of its features and outcomes
title_short Desquamative interstitial pneumonia: a systematic review of its features and outcomes
title_sort desquamative interstitial pneumonia: a systematic review of its features and outcomes
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9488565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32581140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0181-2019
work_keys_str_mv AT hellemonsmerele desquamativeinterstitialpneumoniaasystematicreviewofitsfeaturesandoutcomes
AT moorcatharinac desquamativeinterstitialpneumoniaasystematicreviewofitsfeaturesandoutcomes
AT vonderthusenjan desquamativeinterstitialpneumoniaasystematicreviewofitsfeaturesandoutcomes
AT rossiusmariska desquamativeinterstitialpneumoniaasystematicreviewofitsfeaturesandoutcomes
AT odinkarlette desquamativeinterstitialpneumoniaasystematicreviewofitsfeaturesandoutcomes
AT thorgersenlailahaugen desquamativeinterstitialpneumoniaasystematicreviewofitsfeaturesandoutcomes
AT verschakelenjohny desquamativeinterstitialpneumoniaasystematicreviewofitsfeaturesandoutcomes
AT wuytswim desquamativeinterstitialpneumoniaasystematicreviewofitsfeaturesandoutcomes
AT wijsenbeekmarliess desquamativeinterstitialpneumoniaasystematicreviewofitsfeaturesandoutcomes
AT bendstrupelisabeth desquamativeinterstitialpneumoniaasystematicreviewofitsfeaturesandoutcomes