Cargando…
Desquamative interstitial pneumonia: a systematic review of its features and outcomes
BACKGROUND: Desquamative Interstitial Pneumonia (DIP) is a rare form of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP). Data on clinical features, aetiology, prognosis and effect of treatment strategies are limited. We aimed to collect all published cases to better characterise DIP. METHODS: A systematic l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Respiratory Society
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9488565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32581140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0181-2019 |
_version_ | 1784792686501298176 |
---|---|
author | Hellemons, Merel E. Moor, Catharina C. von der Thüsen, Jan Rossius, Mariska Odink, Arlette Thorgersen, Laila Haugen Verschakelen, Johny Wuyts, Wim Wijsenbeek, Marlies S. Bendstrup, Elisabeth |
author_facet | Hellemons, Merel E. Moor, Catharina C. von der Thüsen, Jan Rossius, Mariska Odink, Arlette Thorgersen, Laila Haugen Verschakelen, Johny Wuyts, Wim Wijsenbeek, Marlies S. Bendstrup, Elisabeth |
author_sort | Hellemons, Merel E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Desquamative Interstitial Pneumonia (DIP) is a rare form of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP). Data on clinical features, aetiology, prognosis and effect of treatment strategies are limited. We aimed to collect all published cases to better characterise DIP. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed for all original cases of adult patients with histopathologically-confirmed DIP. Individual patient data were extracted and summarised. RESULTS: We included 68 individual cases and 13 case series reporting on 294 cases. Most common presenting symptoms were dyspnoea and cough. Pulmonary function showed a restrictive pattern (71%) with decreased diffusion capacity. We found a high incidence (81%) of ever smoking in patients with DIP and 22% of patients had other (occupational) exposures. Characteristic features on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan were bilateral ground-glass opacities with lower lobe predominance (92%). Treatment and duration of treatment widely varied. Initial response to treatment was generally good, but definitely not uniformly so. A significant proportion of patients died (25% of individual cases) or experienced a relapse (18% of individual cases). CONCLUSION: DIP remains an uncommon disease, frequently but not always related to smoking or other exposures. Furthermore, DIP behaves as a progressive disease more often than generally thought, possibly associated with different underlying aetiology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9488565 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | European Respiratory Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94885652022-11-14 Desquamative interstitial pneumonia: a systematic review of its features and outcomes Hellemons, Merel E. Moor, Catharina C. von der Thüsen, Jan Rossius, Mariska Odink, Arlette Thorgersen, Laila Haugen Verschakelen, Johny Wuyts, Wim Wijsenbeek, Marlies S. Bendstrup, Elisabeth Eur Respir Rev Reviews BACKGROUND: Desquamative Interstitial Pneumonia (DIP) is a rare form of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP). Data on clinical features, aetiology, prognosis and effect of treatment strategies are limited. We aimed to collect all published cases to better characterise DIP. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed for all original cases of adult patients with histopathologically-confirmed DIP. Individual patient data were extracted and summarised. RESULTS: We included 68 individual cases and 13 case series reporting on 294 cases. Most common presenting symptoms were dyspnoea and cough. Pulmonary function showed a restrictive pattern (71%) with decreased diffusion capacity. We found a high incidence (81%) of ever smoking in patients with DIP and 22% of patients had other (occupational) exposures. Characteristic features on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan were bilateral ground-glass opacities with lower lobe predominance (92%). Treatment and duration of treatment widely varied. Initial response to treatment was generally good, but definitely not uniformly so. A significant proportion of patients died (25% of individual cases) or experienced a relapse (18% of individual cases). CONCLUSION: DIP remains an uncommon disease, frequently but not always related to smoking or other exposures. Furthermore, DIP behaves as a progressive disease more often than generally thought, possibly associated with different underlying aetiology. European Respiratory Society 2020-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9488565/ /pubmed/32581140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0181-2019 Text en Copyright ©ERS 2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Hellemons, Merel E. Moor, Catharina C. von der Thüsen, Jan Rossius, Mariska Odink, Arlette Thorgersen, Laila Haugen Verschakelen, Johny Wuyts, Wim Wijsenbeek, Marlies S. Bendstrup, Elisabeth Desquamative interstitial pneumonia: a systematic review of its features and outcomes |
title | Desquamative interstitial pneumonia: a systematic review of its features and outcomes |
title_full | Desquamative interstitial pneumonia: a systematic review of its features and outcomes |
title_fullStr | Desquamative interstitial pneumonia: a systematic review of its features and outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Desquamative interstitial pneumonia: a systematic review of its features and outcomes |
title_short | Desquamative interstitial pneumonia: a systematic review of its features and outcomes |
title_sort | desquamative interstitial pneumonia: a systematic review of its features and outcomes |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9488565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32581140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0181-2019 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hellemonsmerele desquamativeinterstitialpneumoniaasystematicreviewofitsfeaturesandoutcomes AT moorcatharinac desquamativeinterstitialpneumoniaasystematicreviewofitsfeaturesandoutcomes AT vonderthusenjan desquamativeinterstitialpneumoniaasystematicreviewofitsfeaturesandoutcomes AT rossiusmariska desquamativeinterstitialpneumoniaasystematicreviewofitsfeaturesandoutcomes AT odinkarlette desquamativeinterstitialpneumoniaasystematicreviewofitsfeaturesandoutcomes AT thorgersenlailahaugen desquamativeinterstitialpneumoniaasystematicreviewofitsfeaturesandoutcomes AT verschakelenjohny desquamativeinterstitialpneumoniaasystematicreviewofitsfeaturesandoutcomes AT wuytswim desquamativeinterstitialpneumoniaasystematicreviewofitsfeaturesandoutcomes AT wijsenbeekmarliess desquamativeinterstitialpneumoniaasystematicreviewofitsfeaturesandoutcomes AT bendstrupelisabeth desquamativeinterstitialpneumoniaasystematicreviewofitsfeaturesandoutcomes |