Cargando…
Discordant diagnostic criteria for pneumonia in COPD trials: a review
Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) have a class effect of increasing pneumonia risk in patients with COPD. However, pneumonia incidence varies widely across clinical trials of ICS use in COPD. This review clarifies methodological differences in defining and recording pneumonia events in these trials and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Respiratory Society
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9488621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34789465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0124-2021 |
_version_ | 1784792699077918720 |
---|---|
author | Wise, Robert A. Bafadhel, Mona Crim, Courtney Criner, Gerard J. Day, Nicola C. Halpin, David M.G. Han, MeiLan K. Lange, Peter Lipson, David A. Martinez, Fernando J. Maselli, Diego J. Midwinter, Dawn Singh, Dave Zysman, Maeva Dransfield, Mark T. Russell, Richard E.K. |
author_facet | Wise, Robert A. Bafadhel, Mona Crim, Courtney Criner, Gerard J. Day, Nicola C. Halpin, David M.G. Han, MeiLan K. Lange, Peter Lipson, David A. Martinez, Fernando J. Maselli, Diego J. Midwinter, Dawn Singh, Dave Zysman, Maeva Dransfield, Mark T. Russell, Richard E.K. |
author_sort | Wise, Robert A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) have a class effect of increasing pneumonia risk in patients with COPD. However, pneumonia incidence varies widely across clinical trials of ICS use in COPD. This review clarifies methodological differences in defining and recording pneumonia events in these trials and discusses factors that could contribute to the varying pneumonia incidence. Literature searches and screening yielded 40 relevant references for inclusion. Methods used to capture pneumonia events in these studies included investigator-reported pneumonia adverse events, standardised list of signs or symptoms, radiographic confirmation of suspected cases and/or confirmation by an independent clinical end-point committee. In general, more stringent pneumonia diagnosis criteria led to lower reported pneumonia incidence rates. In addition, studies varied in design and population characteristics, including exacerbation history and lung function, factors that probably contribute to the varying pneumonia incidence. As such, cross-trial comparisons are problematic. A minimal set of standardised criteria for diagnosis and reporting of pneumonia should be used in COPD studies, as well as reporting of patients’ pneumonia history at baseline, to allow comparison of pneumonia rates between trials. Currently, within-trial comparison of ICS-containing versus non-ICS-containing treatments is the appropriate method to assess the influence of ICS on pneumonia incidence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9488621 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | European Respiratory Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94886212022-11-14 Discordant diagnostic criteria for pneumonia in COPD trials: a review Wise, Robert A. Bafadhel, Mona Crim, Courtney Criner, Gerard J. Day, Nicola C. Halpin, David M.G. Han, MeiLan K. Lange, Peter Lipson, David A. Martinez, Fernando J. Maselli, Diego J. Midwinter, Dawn Singh, Dave Zysman, Maeva Dransfield, Mark T. Russell, Richard E.K. Eur Respir Rev Reviews Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) have a class effect of increasing pneumonia risk in patients with COPD. However, pneumonia incidence varies widely across clinical trials of ICS use in COPD. This review clarifies methodological differences in defining and recording pneumonia events in these trials and discusses factors that could contribute to the varying pneumonia incidence. Literature searches and screening yielded 40 relevant references for inclusion. Methods used to capture pneumonia events in these studies included investigator-reported pneumonia adverse events, standardised list of signs or symptoms, radiographic confirmation of suspected cases and/or confirmation by an independent clinical end-point committee. In general, more stringent pneumonia diagnosis criteria led to lower reported pneumonia incidence rates. In addition, studies varied in design and population characteristics, including exacerbation history and lung function, factors that probably contribute to the varying pneumonia incidence. As such, cross-trial comparisons are problematic. A minimal set of standardised criteria for diagnosis and reporting of pneumonia should be used in COPD studies, as well as reporting of patients’ pneumonia history at baseline, to allow comparison of pneumonia rates between trials. Currently, within-trial comparison of ICS-containing versus non-ICS-containing treatments is the appropriate method to assess the influence of ICS on pneumonia incidence. European Respiratory Society 2021-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9488621/ /pubmed/34789465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0124-2021 Text en Copyright ©The authors 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence 4.0. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Wise, Robert A. Bafadhel, Mona Crim, Courtney Criner, Gerard J. Day, Nicola C. Halpin, David M.G. Han, MeiLan K. Lange, Peter Lipson, David A. Martinez, Fernando J. Maselli, Diego J. Midwinter, Dawn Singh, Dave Zysman, Maeva Dransfield, Mark T. Russell, Richard E.K. Discordant diagnostic criteria for pneumonia in COPD trials: a review |
title | Discordant diagnostic criteria for pneumonia in COPD trials: a review |
title_full | Discordant diagnostic criteria for pneumonia in COPD trials: a review |
title_fullStr | Discordant diagnostic criteria for pneumonia in COPD trials: a review |
title_full_unstemmed | Discordant diagnostic criteria for pneumonia in COPD trials: a review |
title_short | Discordant diagnostic criteria for pneumonia in COPD trials: a review |
title_sort | discordant diagnostic criteria for pneumonia in copd trials: a review |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9488621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34789465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0124-2021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wiseroberta discordantdiagnosticcriteriaforpneumoniaincopdtrialsareview AT bafadhelmona discordantdiagnosticcriteriaforpneumoniaincopdtrialsareview AT crimcourtney discordantdiagnosticcriteriaforpneumoniaincopdtrialsareview AT crinergerardj discordantdiagnosticcriteriaforpneumoniaincopdtrialsareview AT daynicolac discordantdiagnosticcriteriaforpneumoniaincopdtrialsareview AT halpindavidmg discordantdiagnosticcriteriaforpneumoniaincopdtrialsareview AT hanmeilank discordantdiagnosticcriteriaforpneumoniaincopdtrialsareview AT langepeter discordantdiagnosticcriteriaforpneumoniaincopdtrialsareview AT lipsondavida discordantdiagnosticcriteriaforpneumoniaincopdtrialsareview AT martinezfernandoj discordantdiagnosticcriteriaforpneumoniaincopdtrialsareview AT masellidiegoj discordantdiagnosticcriteriaforpneumoniaincopdtrialsareview AT midwinterdawn discordantdiagnosticcriteriaforpneumoniaincopdtrialsareview AT singhdave discordantdiagnosticcriteriaforpneumoniaincopdtrialsareview AT zysmanmaeva discordantdiagnosticcriteriaforpneumoniaincopdtrialsareview AT dransfieldmarkt discordantdiagnosticcriteriaforpneumoniaincopdtrialsareview AT russellrichardek discordantdiagnosticcriteriaforpneumoniaincopdtrialsareview |