Cargando…

Development and clinical translation of tubular constructs for tracheal tissue engineering: a review

Effective restoration of extensive tracheal damage arising from cancer, stenosis, infection or congenital abnormalities remains an unmet clinical need in respiratory medicine. The trachea is a 10–11 cm long fibrocartilaginous tube of the lower respiratory tract, with 16–20 tracheal cartilages antero...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soriano, Luis, Khalid, Tehreem, Whelan, Derek, O'Huallachain, Niall, Redmond, Karen C., O'Brien, Fergal J., O'Leary, Cian, Cryan, Sally-Ann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Respiratory Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9488721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34750116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0154-2021
_version_ 1784792721607622656
author Soriano, Luis
Khalid, Tehreem
Whelan, Derek
O'Huallachain, Niall
Redmond, Karen C.
O'Brien, Fergal J.
O'Leary, Cian
Cryan, Sally-Ann
author_facet Soriano, Luis
Khalid, Tehreem
Whelan, Derek
O'Huallachain, Niall
Redmond, Karen C.
O'Brien, Fergal J.
O'Leary, Cian
Cryan, Sally-Ann
author_sort Soriano, Luis
collection PubMed
description Effective restoration of extensive tracheal damage arising from cancer, stenosis, infection or congenital abnormalities remains an unmet clinical need in respiratory medicine. The trachea is a 10–11 cm long fibrocartilaginous tube of the lower respiratory tract, with 16–20 tracheal cartilages anterolaterally and a dynamic trachealis muscle posteriorly. Tracheal resection is commonly offered to patients suffering from short-length tracheal defects, but replacement is required when the trauma exceeds 50% of total length of the trachea in adults and 30% in children. Recently, tissue engineering (TE) has shown promise to fabricate biocompatible tissue-engineered tracheal implants for tracheal replacement and regeneration. However, its widespread use is hampered by inadequate re-epithelialisation, poor mechanical properties, insufficient revascularisation and unsatisfactory durability, leading to little success in the clinical use of tissue-engineered tracheal implants to date. Here, we describe in detail the historical attempts and the lessons learned for tracheal TE approaches by contextualising the clinical needs and essential requirements for a functional tracheal graft. TE manufacturing approaches explored to date and the clinical translation of both TE and non-TE strategies for tracheal regeneration are summarised to fully understand the big picture of tracheal TE and its impact on clinical treatment of extensive tracheal defects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9488721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher European Respiratory Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94887212022-11-14 Development and clinical translation of tubular constructs for tracheal tissue engineering: a review Soriano, Luis Khalid, Tehreem Whelan, Derek O'Huallachain, Niall Redmond, Karen C. O'Brien, Fergal J. O'Leary, Cian Cryan, Sally-Ann Eur Respir Rev Reviews Effective restoration of extensive tracheal damage arising from cancer, stenosis, infection or congenital abnormalities remains an unmet clinical need in respiratory medicine. The trachea is a 10–11 cm long fibrocartilaginous tube of the lower respiratory tract, with 16–20 tracheal cartilages anterolaterally and a dynamic trachealis muscle posteriorly. Tracheal resection is commonly offered to patients suffering from short-length tracheal defects, but replacement is required when the trauma exceeds 50% of total length of the trachea in adults and 30% in children. Recently, tissue engineering (TE) has shown promise to fabricate biocompatible tissue-engineered tracheal implants for tracheal replacement and regeneration. However, its widespread use is hampered by inadequate re-epithelialisation, poor mechanical properties, insufficient revascularisation and unsatisfactory durability, leading to little success in the clinical use of tissue-engineered tracheal implants to date. Here, we describe in detail the historical attempts and the lessons learned for tracheal TE approaches by contextualising the clinical needs and essential requirements for a functional tracheal graft. TE manufacturing approaches explored to date and the clinical translation of both TE and non-TE strategies for tracheal regeneration are summarised to fully understand the big picture of tracheal TE and its impact on clinical treatment of extensive tracheal defects. European Respiratory Society 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9488721/ /pubmed/34750116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0154-2021 Text en Copyright ©The authors 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org (mailto:permissions@ersnet.org)
spellingShingle Reviews
Soriano, Luis
Khalid, Tehreem
Whelan, Derek
O'Huallachain, Niall
Redmond, Karen C.
O'Brien, Fergal J.
O'Leary, Cian
Cryan, Sally-Ann
Development and clinical translation of tubular constructs for tracheal tissue engineering: a review
title Development and clinical translation of tubular constructs for tracheal tissue engineering: a review
title_full Development and clinical translation of tubular constructs for tracheal tissue engineering: a review
title_fullStr Development and clinical translation of tubular constructs for tracheal tissue engineering: a review
title_full_unstemmed Development and clinical translation of tubular constructs for tracheal tissue engineering: a review
title_short Development and clinical translation of tubular constructs for tracheal tissue engineering: a review
title_sort development and clinical translation of tubular constructs for tracheal tissue engineering: a review
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9488721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34750116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0154-2021
work_keys_str_mv AT sorianoluis developmentandclinicaltranslationoftubularconstructsfortrachealtissueengineeringareview
AT khalidtehreem developmentandclinicaltranslationoftubularconstructsfortrachealtissueengineeringareview
AT whelanderek developmentandclinicaltranslationoftubularconstructsfortrachealtissueengineeringareview
AT ohuallachainniall developmentandclinicaltranslationoftubularconstructsfortrachealtissueengineeringareview
AT redmondkarenc developmentandclinicaltranslationoftubularconstructsfortrachealtissueengineeringareview
AT obrienfergalj developmentandclinicaltranslationoftubularconstructsfortrachealtissueengineeringareview
AT olearycian developmentandclinicaltranslationoftubularconstructsfortrachealtissueengineeringareview
AT cryansallyann developmentandclinicaltranslationoftubularconstructsfortrachealtissueengineeringareview